Serious note though, I think Ghosts of Mars is kind of overrated. It's not in my Top 10 or anything, but I think it's just fucking crazy enough to be entertaining.
I dunno. I think I have to disagree with you on this one, broski. I'll give you that I suppose it manages to be entertaining in a bigger budget Deadly Prey sort of way, but there is so much wrong with this movie.
Natasha Henstridge isn't a great actress and this was her worst performance that I've seen. Pam Grier seems like a cool lady but she is a pretty terrible actress and this is another bad performance. Since they had to carry a lot of the movie, it got kind of painful.
Mostly I don't know what Carpenter was doing with his directing. Characters were always telling stories about what had got them to the place they were at, and if they said "I walked down a hall to get to this room," Carpenter would overlay a shot of them walking down a hall to illustrate. It got to the point of being comical. But the acting was generally so bad, that it was better to have these silly flashbacks of nothing than hold on the actor telling the story.
I guess Jason Statham and Clea Duvall showed some promise to deliver their lines reasonably well amid this waste. It must have been a challenge under the circumstances.
He had a physically imposing main villain with that leader of the Mars Ghosts, but then he neutered him and made him a laughingstock by having him yell baby talk.
Also, it was baffling how often and when Carpenter chose to fade between shots. In the middle of an action sequence, he would use slow dissolves, so I thought time had passed, but then the action scene would just continue. He would fade out of scenes while actors were in the middle of their lines. It was like he had forgotten what fading is for, or else so much of what he had filmed didn't work that he had to just try to cover up the holes with cross dissolves.
I just find it hard to believe that the same guy made such an excellent close-quarters thriller as The Thing, twenty years earlier with far less experience. That film didn't suffer from these weird and cheap narrative and editing choices.
But The Thing was also filled with legit actors down to the smallest characters. There weren't Henstridge and Grier taking you out of the moment at every turn. The conversations just between these two were like high school theater bad.
His whole thing about having the world now be female-dominated was also a failure from the start. He just mentioned it in the opening crawl and had Ice Cube refer to being hassled by "the woman," but then nothing about this world suggested that it was a matriarchal society at all. Statham was sexually harassing Henstridge from the first scene like it was the 1950s, and Henstridge isn't really a casting choice that exudes authority. Plus the male roles were filled with Jason Statham, Ice Cube and some huge Ving Rhames kind of black guy, not exactly docile types easily dominated by women in power. I remember there was a Star Trek episode with a matriarchal society, and the guys all looked like twinks from a cuck video. They committed to that concept. John Carpenter just mentioned it and figured that was enough. It was just lazy.