Social Erika Kirk

[Last Falconry]

someone take care of those damn kids before they rob me in 10 years

 

[BFoe]

It's very simple - the left hoped that killing Kirk would silence that voice for good. The fact that she's picked up the mantle and run with it, and it's accelerating, is totally offensive to them because that wasn't the plan. They totally DO want her to stay in bed crying because that was the aim of killing Kirk in the first place - to silence that dissenting voice. She is now a symbol of the fact that they cannot achieve their goal.

There was no “plan” from “the left.” Charlie Kirk was killed by a wingnut idiot kid who was a too much of a wingnut and an idiot to understand that assassinations rarely achieve the aims that the assassin intends.

Turning Point spreading is “offensive” to us because Turning Point is itself a disgusting, offensive, extremist organization, and I don’t want extremism spreading.

 

[Deaths Head]

There was no “plan” from “the left.” Charlie Kirk was killed by a wingnut idiot kid who was a too much of a wingnut and an idiot to understand that assassinations rarely achieve the aims that the assassin intends.

Turning Point spreading is “offensive” to us because Turning Point is itself a disgusting, offensive, extremist organization, and I don’t want extremism spreading.

@Confucamus

I bet you wish you could delete this one . Lol

 

[IanEdwards]

Yea I’m sure Charlie had everones best interest going into any debate , that’s like being a Trump supporter and claiming you care about rights and the constitution.

yeah you won't get confucanmus discussing this point, he ignored it like 6 times in the immediate aftermath of St Charlie's death and I don't imagine he'll address it now.

me, i made as much fun as possible over St Charlie's death because St Charlie was a shining example in every way, and as a passionate advocate of free speech, and someone who was able to see the humour in political violence when he wanted to, St Charlie himself would support my right to have a laugh over his death, in fact I was simply carrying on his legacy in doing so.

Some great 'patriot' should have bailed that trans kid who shot St Charlie out months ago.

 

[Deaths Head]

yeah you won't get confucanmus discussing this point, he ignored it like 6 times in the immediate aftermath of St Charlie's death and I don't imagine he'll address it now.

me, i made as much fun as possible over St Charlie's death because St Charlie was a shining example in every way, and as a passionate advocate of free speech, and someone who was able to see the humour in political violence when he wanted to, St Charlie himself would support my right to have a laugh over his death, in fact I was simply carrying on his legacy in doing so.

Some great 'patriot' should have bailed that trans kid who shot St Charlie out months ago.

No I get it a lot of Kirks quotes are taking out of context but that’s what he did on purpose, he’d make a statement that he really means then let media take a quote then say it was not what he meant to make the left the bad guys .

The fact is he was a smug jerk and manipulative person hired by the right to get the younger generation on board with Maga madness .

 

[Confucamus]

In keeping with the theme of this thread, we have again an unhinged leftist losing her shit over a Target employee wearing a Charlie Kirk shirt. Filming this woman at work and harassing her over a T-shirt? It's truly amazing how insecure Kirk made people on the left feel simply by championing open debate and the free exchange of ideas.



The woman below filmed and posted this video and is now getting a good dose of karma. People calling into her work demanding she be fired. Hopefully she is, and her life is ruined from here on out. She certainly deserves it.



Amazingly, the Target employee this woman attacked is being way more graceful than I would be in this situation.

 

[Confucamus]

@Confucamus

I bet you wish you could delete this one . Lol

Boy, you are desperate for attention today. Posts don't get deleted simply because mods disagree with them. @BFoe is entitled to his opinion and never has a problem backing it up. He, along with @LangfordBarrow , is probably the most civil left wing poster on here when it comes to disagreements. You should try doing that, instead of pathetically begging to be noticed just so you can start an argument.

 

[BFoe]

@Confucamus

I bet you wish you could delete this one . Lol

yeah you won't get confucanmus discussing this point, he ignored it like 6 times in the immediate aftermath of St Charlie's death and I don't imagine he'll address it now.

me, i made as much fun as possible over St Charlie's death because St Charlie was a shining example in every way, and as a passionate advocate of free speech, and someone who was able to see the humour in political violence when he wanted to, St Charlie himself would support my right to have a laugh over his death, in fact I was simply carrying on his legacy in doing so.

Some great 'patriot' should have bailed that trans kid who shot St Charlie out months ago.
Click to expand...

I’ll back up what @Confucamus said above. I don’t think anything in my post runs afoul of the rules or is delete-worthy. That is, if I was a poster and not a mod, I don’t think the post would get deleted. He and I have different political views, and that’s ok.

I know this won’t please some left-leaning posters to hear me say this, but @Confucamus is a very fair and even-keeled moderator. When anyone deletes a post, other mods can still see it. I can literally see any post he deletes, I can see every report he handles and how it was handled, I can see every card he issues.
He’s a good mod and very fair. If anyone doesn’t like the way he handled something, they probably wouldn’t have liked it if I handled it either, because it would’ve been the same result.

 

[Fedor>Cain]

I’ll back up what @Confucamus said above. I don’t think anything in my post runs afoul of the rules or is delete-worthy. That is, if I was a poster and not a mod, I don’t think the post would get deleted. He and I have different political views, and that’s ok.

I know this won’t please some left-leaning posters to hear me say this, but @Confucamus is a very fair and even-keeled moderator. When anyone deletes a post, other mods can still see it. I can literally see any post he deletes, I can see every report he handles and how it was handled, I can see every card he issues.
He’s a good mod and very fair. If anyone doesn’t like the way he handled something, they probably wouldn’t have liked it if I handled it either, because it would’ve been the same result.

Fuck all that.

I want to see you two in a steel cage.

 

[IanEdwards]

I’ll back up what @Confucamus said above. I don’t think anything in my post runs afoul of the rules or is delete-worthy.

nor did I say it would, you're referring to someone else's post there

He’s a good mod and very fair.
i have said before he may well be a good mod, just a shitty poster, no drama

 

[DoctorTaco]

It's very simple - THE LEFT hoped that killing Kirk would silence that voice for good. The fact that she's picked up the mantle and run with it, and it's accelerating, is totally offensive to THEM because that wasn't the plan. THEY totally DO want her to stay in bed crying because that was the aim of killing Kirk in the first place - to silence that dissenting voice. She is now a symbol of the fact that THEY cannot achieve THEIR goal.

Help me out here- where as I understand “the left” to be a catch all term for people with more progressive views, aproximately 35% of Americans or roughly 119 million people.

clearly you mean something more here.

Who is “the left” that you are referring to here specifically? According to this post “the left” killed Charlie Kirk and has goals and expectations around that slaying. Now they are offended because she’s not doing what they want.

Who again are they specifically? Whos in charge of them? Who sends them their matching orders? Where do you get your insight into the machinations and feelings of this sinister cabal of conspiratorial murderers?

 

[deviake]

Help me out here- where as I understand “the left” to be a catch all term for people with more progressive views, aproximately 35% of Americans or roughly 119 million people.

clearly you mean something more here.

Who is “the left” that you are referring to here specifically? According to this post “the left” killed Charlie Kirk and has goals and expectations around that slaying. Now they are offended because she’s not doing what they want.

Who again are they specifically? Whos in charge of them? Who sends them their matching orders? Where do you get your insight into the machinations and feelings of this sinister cabal of conspiratorial murderers?

These people are so weird. They or their preferred politicians joke about violence and death and enact it through policy and basically every study ever says right-wingers kill more people than all other political groups but the left is ultra violent and celebrates violence. It's so strange. Lotta inverting and projection. I've bodied right-wingers on here by simply asking the ones who called burning Teslas terrorism if J6 was also terrorism. Never mind that more educated people tend to be left leaning. Many righties are Islamophobic and generalize Muslims by the extremists but many of them actually believe the same shit just in Christian form, they want a Christian caliphate. Utterly baffling. Thick layers of the dissonance of the heavily propagandized right-wing mind. Dealt with it in real life too. Always pointing the fingers for their problems in the wrong direction, by design.

No one hates Erika Kirk. She just comes across as weird and disingenuous. She's a part of the circus. They keep trying to make it deeper than it is; maybe that's projection too.

 

[Blayt7hh]

So you'll waste your time going off topic and responding to shit like this instead of the actual post?

I wonder why.

He’s pretty hateful himself. I also bet he didn’t mean to call you smarmy and thinks he was calling you smug or a smart ass when he used it. He’s done that with me too. I’m definitely not smarmy but I am a smart ass

 

[Confucamus]

He’s a good mod and very fair.
i have said before he may well be a good mod, just a shitty poster, no drama

 

[Qays Stetkevich]

Honestly , this is pretty weak justification for the amount of hatred the woman gets.

What are the rules? What is expected of her, in your opinion, to be an acceptable widow? What should her punishment be for not staying home, laying in bed and crying? She has kids, life has to go on. Turning Point was their life. Their livelihood.
It also happens to be a conservative group having quite an influence on a lot of young people and let be real, THAT is the problem people have with her . Seriously, look at the posters talking shit about her- Do you really think they're upset for their boy Charlie not being grieved enough? Please. She's an influential conservative christian who conservatives sympathize with. Thats why they hate her.

Reality check: she came out WWE style with fireworks at her husbands funeral, to the 9s, and just drips fake. Regardless of all else. Project your narrative as to why she's hated so much and pretend it has nothing to do with how fake, superficial and weirdly-quickly-over-her-husband's-brutal-murder. You know, tactless. Heaven forbid people don't like a public figure like that, or find it weird.

 

[Islam Imamate]

He’s pretty hateful himself. I also bet he didn’t mean to call you smarmy and thinks he was calling you smug or a smart ass when he used it. He’s done that with me too. I’m definitely not smarmy but I am a smart ass

Yeah it's insane to see him of all people complain about others being hateful when these guys actively worked to make politics more hateful and spite driven.

You have Confudumbass digging up incidents involving random people online and acting like they represent the left when the leader of their party just got done trashing Rob Reiner after he was brutally murdered. Their literal representatives act like shitbags but somehow that doesn't reflect on them the way random assholes on Twitter reflect the left. Nonsensical drivel that should be treated with contempt.

 

[nhbbear]

Is it too soon to say wood? I mean in a romantic kind of way, not a rough and tumble in a closet and then put a money shot on her neck.

 

[Mujeriego]

Boy, you are desperate for attention today. Posts don't get deleted simply because mods disagree with them. @BFoe is entitled to his opinion and never has a problem backing it up. He, along with @LangfordBarrow , is probably the most civil left wing poster on here when it comes to disagreements. You should try doing that, instead of pathetically begging to be noticed just so you can start an argument.

I’ll back up what @Confucamus said above. I don’t think anything in my post runs afoul of the rules or is delete-worthy. That is, if I was a poster and not a mod, I don’t think the post would get deleted. He and I have different political views, and that’s ok.

I know this won’t please some left-leaning posters to hear me say this, but @Confucamus is a very fair and even-keeled moderator. When anyone deletes a post, other mods can still see it. I can literally see any post he deletes, I can see every report he handles and how it was handled, I can see every card he issues.
He’s a good mod and very fair. If anyone doesn’t like the way he handled something, they probably wouldn’t have liked it if I handled it either, because it would’ve been the same result.

This is The War Room not The Shake Hands and Make Peace room.

 

[MDoza]

It’s just a bit weird that she stayed in the spotlight the entire time immediately following the shooting.

She allowed the Republican Party to utilize her for political purposes, then seemingly used that to bolster her own notoriety and promote Turning Point.

In a sense it’s smart, because she still has to make money and I’m sure she wants to champion her late husband’s cause, but it also comes off as a bit insensitive that politics and money are such major priorities for someone that is probably already well off and could have had someone else run the company for a bit.

If she took 6 months to a year off and spent all her time with her kids, then came back and did all of this, it would feel much less questionable.

 

[Bob Gray]

It’s just a bit weird that she stayed in the spotlight the entire time immediately following the shooting.

She allowed the Republican Party to utilize her for political purposes, then seemingly used that to bolster her own notoriety and promote Turning Point.

In a sense it’s smart, because she still has to make money and I’m sure she wants to champion her late husband’s cause, but it also comes off as a bit insensitive that politics and money are such major priorities for someone that is probably already well off and could have had someone else run the company for a bit.

If she took 6 months to a year off and spent all her time with her kids, then came back and did all of this, it would feel much less questionable.

If theres one thing she doesnt need, its money. I can only begin to guess what Kirks life insurance policy payout would have been, on top of the net worth they already had.
Sometimes people like Charlie and Erika Kirk believe theyre doing a good thing, and thats as powerful a motivator as anything, especially people that are deeply religious. Its easy to be flippant, dismissive and assume nefarious intent because for most people these are basically characters they see on the TV. Everyone is always a grifter, racist, fascist, libtard, commie, etc as opposed to the most obvious answer. They just believe in what they're doing.