Social Erika Kirk

weirdly, whilst I obviously don't come across as having any love for EK, I wouldn't cast aspersions in the sense of saying she isn't really genuinely grieving her husband. There is a broad spectrum of human emotional responses and especially how emotions are displayed (or potentially not displayed so much, in this case)

But I do think there is something discordant as fuck in the whole tonality of it all, in terms of the place she is tryintg to assume in the media sphere. As i mention above i wonder if some of that is due to the dissonance of being a woman, any kind of woman in the magasphere, and the contradictions that entails. She is now head of a movement which has actively proselytised against her being in the exact position she is in, a career woman. I believe she was also college educated, another example of 'rules for thee but not for me'. Basically she isn't really a 'tradwife' at all, IMO, and its the cosplaying of that role that probably strikes me as most hypocritical. I wonder if behind closed doors there was always a sense that the 'tradwife' prescriptions were just for the poors, and the blessed demographics like EK would carry on going to college, having a career and agency if they wanted them.
 
Last edited:
the rube mouthpiece was murdered you say? that would just be terrible. some would say that charlie kirk simply just lost the gun debate and succumbed to trump dicksucking syndrome. tots and pears go out to the grifting widow, err i mean greaving widow.

i mean afterall, dancing on the graves of murdered people is now a respectable practice for decent human beings, ain't that right seano?


Imagine taking the time to type this out and thinking it makes you look like anything but a raving idiot. Imagine thinking this is a clever choice of words to represent your feelings on the forum. What a dork.

You seem like an angry and lonely little man. Lose the inappropriate rage at everything and you'll meet someone special one day. There's someone for everyone.
 
Imagine taking the time to type this out and thinking it makes you look like anything but a raving idiot. Imagine thinking this is a clever choice of words to represent your feelings on the forum. What a dork.

You seem like an angry and lonely little man. Lose the inappropriate rage at everything and you'll meet someone special one day. There's someone for everyone.


awwww. poor seano. project harder little muppet.
 
Imagine taking the time to type this out and thinking it makes you look like anything but a raving idiot. Imagine thinking this is a clever choice of words to represent your feelings on the forum. What a dork.

You seem like an angry and lonely little man. Lose the inappropriate rage at everything and you'll meet someone special one day. There's someone for everyone.

and imagine taking the time to type this out and thinking it makes you look like anything but a raving idiot. imagine thinking this is a clever choice of words to represent your feelings.

hq720.jpg


i mean afterall, dancing on the graves of murdered people is now a respectable practice for decent human beings, ain't that right seano? you know, it'd be terrible if your molester messiah had to be a decent human being for once in his life.
 
Lmao at “Confuseddumbass” I came up with that first!

I’m not sure who is more embarrassing him or the resident punching bag reject in here @Seano
{<jimmies}

No worries, my man. I've come to appreciate how important this place is for some of you to pretend to be superior. Commence the circle jerk.
 
and imagine taking the time to type this out and thinking it makes you look like anything but a raving idiot. imagine thinking this is a clever choice of words to represent your feelings.

hq720.jpg


i mean afterall, dancing on the graves of murdered people is now a respectable practice for decent human beings, ain't that right seano? you know, it'd be terrible if your molester messiah had to be a decent human being for once in his life.
Imagine talking respectability and decorum in the age of Trump as a Trump supporter. I cannot even fathom that level of brain broken
 
I'm glad you and Nick Fuentes have found something you have in common.

Its pretty clear that your hate for her isn't rational and is grounded more in what she believes than her actions.

Like I can't imagine expecting my wife to go into seclusion and live a life of depression with my kids if something awful happened to me. That's really what you'd expect from your wife? Is your ego so fragile that you'd expect your wife's life to be over when yours is? And you're saying she's creepy?

Honestly, it'd be a better look for you if you just admitted you hate her because of what she stands for. You don't hide it well enough to pretend otherwise. If she wasn't a high profile conservative, you wouldn't even be talking about this. I'd go so far as to say you'd opine about her bravery if everything else were exactly the same but her views aligned with yours.

Sorry, but her reaction/QUICK turnaround after the loss of her husband and the father of her children is, all opinions aside, statistically very abnormal. Her "mourning window" was miniscule, and/or her way of mourning is very, very different from the overwhelming majority of people in her position. . . . UNLESS. . . . and bear with me here, UNLESS their relationship wasn't that deep, and she actually isn't mourning very much/badly and is using him/his death as a springboard to money/a career. The latter seems much, much more likely, although the two aren't mutually exclusive. As I said above, if you even suspect her of genuine emotion after watching/hearing her speak/post publicly in the last couple of months, then you're either very gullible to conservative media or have absolutely no radar whatsoever for superficiality, crocodile tears, or grifters.

Note: And I defintely don't have an "irrational hate" for her. I don't know or care about her at all. She just EXUDES fakery from her pores.
 
Sorry, but her reaction/QUICK turnaround after the loss of her husband and the father of her children is, all opinions aside, statistically very abnormal. Her "mourning window" was miniscule, and/or her way of mourning is very, very different from the overwhelming majority of people in her position. . . . UNLESS. . . . and bear with me here, UNLESS their relationship wasn't that deep, and she actually isn't mourning very much/badly and is using him/his death as a springboard to money/a career. The latter seems much, much more likely, although the two aren't mutually exclusive. As I said above, if you even suspect her of genuine emotion after watching/hearing her speak/post publicly in the last couple of months, then you're either very gullible to conservative media or have absolutely no radar whatsoever for superficiality, crocodile tears, or grifters.

Note: And I defintely don't have an "irrational hate" for her. I don't know or care about her at all. She just EXUDES fakery from her pores.
The entire right wing now is creepy ppl spreading creepy things in the world , when an administration is using the ( Gods Work ) every time they commit crimes or break laws you know your in a cult if you’re still supporting Trump and his goons thst occupy the White House .

( Religion is a favorite strategic appeal to its base of religious conservative and white evangelical Christian voters. This rhetoric is designed to secure political support )

When cult members leave , they are just replaced and the band plays on as though nothing much happened ………..

That’s a cult .
 
3 tags from you in as many minutes. Yeah, thats what it is.

yeah that's right ya punching bag reject. responding to your shitposts must surely mean that i am raging mad. you just trigger the whole place every time you grace the forum with your presence. oh no another post from seano, nearly 140,000 served! no wonder why even the mods refer to you as one of the most vile shitbags on the forum.

you know it's kinda sad knowing that doe 174 ain't ever gonna give you the bubba treatment no matter how deep you slide that tongue up his ass, and neither would that grifting, errr greaving widow of that rube mouthpiece who lost the gun debate and finally succumbed to trump dicksucking syndrome over at that university on that horrible day. as donnie dearest would say, "may he rest in peace!"
 
No.... he was asked a question and he was answering it.

Usually happens in a conversation.

The words spoken right before his death were him clarifying a question that was posed to him.

he wasnt villifying trans people nor sprinkling in a bit of racism . thats all your opinion and assumptions .

"Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?", to which Kirk responded, "Too many".

This is kirk villifying trans people to you?..... answering a question posed to him?


Being asked " Do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years?", and Kirk's last words before being shot were his reply, "Counting or not counting gang violence?"

Asking if counting gang violence for mass shootings is not racist ..... its literally establishing the parameters for the discussion and question that was posed to him.

You are the only one that brought colour into it.


His aim with these bizarre responses was to compartmentalize violence (the issue of gun murder) to certain groups in an attempt to vilify them, it doesn't take any sophistication to see that.



One thing though, if there is a way to go out, its on a subject you are passionate about-


“I think it’s worth it. It’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God given rights. That’s a prudent deal. It is rational,

"some people have to die for 2nd amendment"




C Kirk died by his words. Hespect
 
The mere mention of gang violence being a "racist dog whistle" is one of the big problems that happens with a lot of people on the left. You're essentially criticizing someone as a racist based on your powers of mind reading. Its never what they say, its what theyre thinking, and of course, you know what theyre thinking more than anyone else does.
Yeah, because he had no history of saying racist shit, lol. Stop gaslighting me.
 
Sorry, but her reaction/QUICK turnaround after the loss of her husband and the father of her children is, all opinions aside, statistically very abnormal. Her "mourning window" was miniscule, and/or her way of mourning is very, very different from the overwhelming majority of people in her position. . . . UNLESS. . . . and bear with me here, UNLESS their relationship wasn't that deep, and she actually isn't mourning very much/badly and is using him/his death as a springboard to money/a career. The latter seems much, much more likely, although the two aren't mutually exclusive. As I said above, if you even suspect her of genuine emotion after watching/hearing her speak/post publicly in the last couple of months, then you're either very gullible to conservative media or have absolutely no radar whatsoever for superficiality, crocodile tears, or grifters.

Note: And I defintely don't have an "irrational hate" for her. I don't know or care about her at all. She just EXUDES fakery from her pores.
Honestly , this is pretty weak justification for the amount of hatred the woman gets.

What are the rules? What is expected of her, in your opinion, to be an acceptable widow? What should her punishment be for not staying home, laying in bed and crying? She has kids, life has to go on. Turning Point was their life. Their livelihood.
It also happens to be a conservative group having quite an influence on a lot of young people and let be real, THAT is the problem people have with her . Seriously, look at the posters talking shit about her- Do you really think they're upset for their boy Charlie not being grieved enough? Please. She's an influential conservative christian who conservatives sympathize with. Thats why they hate her.
 
Honestly , this is pretty weak justification for the amount of hatred the woman gets.

What are the rules? What is expected of her, in your opinion, to be an acceptable widow? What should her punishment be for not staying home, laying in bed and crying? She has kids, life has to go on. Turning Point was their life. Their livelihood.
It also happens to be a conservative group having quite an influence on a lot of young people and let be real, THAT is the problem people have with her . Seriously, look at the posters talking shit about her- Do you really think they're upset for their boy Charlie not being grieved enough? Please. She's an influential conservative christian who conservatives sympathize with. Thats why they hate her.
Who hates her? She just seems very questionable. The .2 of you who defend her make it way deeper than it is. It's basically, "That's uh, super weird" and you have a meltdown about it.
 
Honestly , this is pretty weak justification for the amount of hatred the woman gets.

What are the rules? What is expected of her, in your opinion, to be an acceptable widow? What should her punishment be for not staying home, laying in bed and crying? She has kids, life has to go on. Turning Point was their life. Their livelihood.
It also happens to be a conservative group having quite an influence on a lot of young people and let be
real, THAT is the problem people have with her . Seriously, look at the posters talking shit about her- Do you really think they're upset for their boy Charlie not being grieved enough? Please. She's an influential conservative christian who conservatives sympathize with. Thats why they hate her.



It's very simple - the left hoped that killing Kirk would silence that voice for good. The fact that she's picked up the mantle and run with it, and it's accelerating, is totally offensive to them because that wasn't the plan. They totally DO want her to stay in bed crying because that was the aim of killing Kirk in the first place - to silence that dissenting voice. She is now a symbol of the fact that they cannot achieve their goal.
 
It's very simple - the left hoped that killing Kirk would silence that voice for good. The fact that she's picked up the mantle and run with it, and it's accelerating, is totally offensive to them because that wasn't the plan. They totally DO want her to stay in bed crying because that was the aim of killing Kirk in the first place - to silence that dissenting voice. She is now a symbol of the fact that they cannot achieve their goal.

Might be a good thing if you just said no to drugs.
 
Back
Top