Social Erika Kirk

[Islam Imamate]

Yup I read them. I guess you don't have a source on what Trump actually said though, which is the lie you kept pushing.

If you expected me to provide a transcript of the call then idk what to say to you other than to tell you that you're a f*cking moron.

We're not in trial and we don't have all the evidence. With the evidence we do have, hit doesn't outweigh what the guy said with his own mouth. Could he be lying? Of course. We don't know anything of sure. My point is you are stating something as fact but it turns out to be your assumption more than anything.

Why wouldn't it outweigh what he said? You're taking a defendant at his word in spite of contradictory evidence because it's convenient for you to ignore the fact that Boelter was a radical Christian and anti-abortion lunatic.

How can I deny something that's a fact? We know he had a list. You are choosing to come to a conclusion that suits you though. One that is already proven wrong by Boelter's own words.

You think Boelter's testimony is proof?

lol Those are sources I gave. I asked you if you had better sources. You are continuing to dodge that question, so we are done here. It really only took a tiny bit of scrutiny for all of your "facts" to fall completely apart and now you're just playing games. With both cases, we've found you are stating your opinion as fact and ignoring evidence that doesn't give you what you want. I gave you a lot of chances to elaborate, but it's clear you want to drag this into a circular conversation where you distract and don't actually look at evidence in an objective way.

Are you truly this stupid? You didn't elaborate on the motive nor did you link to a single reputable source. This truly is like playing chess with a pigeon.

Also who is the we in "we've" here? Do you have another moron living in your head you swap out with?

 

[Crazy Source]

Kozak asked "Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?", to which Kirk responded, "Too many". Kozak followed up with, "Do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years?", and Kirk's last words before being shot were his reply, "Counting or not counting gang violence?", to which then Kozak said "Great", with Kirk being struck .

He was vilifying trans people and sprinkled in a little racism with the "gang violence" jab.

 

[AmonTobin]

TPUSA isn’t making the money they thought they would and the anger is plain to see on Erika’s face. This media tour can’t go on much longer. People are tired of this hateful shit.

 

[IanEdwards]

TPUSA isn’t making the money they thought they would and the anger is plain to see on Erika’s face. This media tour can’t go on much longer. People are tired of this hateful shit.

they're kind of like jordan Peterson paving the way for the likes of Andrew Tate in terms of their 'saving masculinity'

they opened up the RW media space, but the heavily-online types won't have their thirst for toxicity sated by the mere dogwhistles like Saint Charlie used to put out there

they want to see their racism and chauvinism full-fat and in your face, like the Apostle Nick Fuentes.

 

[Anewt]

He was vilifying trans people and sprinkled in a little racism with the "gang violence" jab.

No.... he was asked a question and he was answering it.

Usually happens in a conversation.

The words spoken right before his death were him clarifying a question that was posed to him.

he wasnt villifying trans people nor sprinkling in a bit of racism . thats all your opinion and assumptions .

"Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?", to which Kirk responded, "Too many".

This is kirk villifying trans people to you?..... answering a question posed to him?


Being asked " Do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years?", and Kirk's last words before being shot were his reply, "Counting or not counting gang violence?"

Asking if counting gang violence for mass shootings is not racist ..... its literally establishing the parameters for the discussion and question that was posed to him.

You are the only one that brought colour into it.

 

[Witchhunt]

Has a picture of her butthole surfaced yet?

Yeah, yeah… it’s for a friend.

 

[deviake]

I wonder how many "people grieve in their own way" posts are in this thread.

I know I frequently grieve by doing the moonwalk to fireworks at people's funerals.

 

[Phisher]

Amazing.

The viewership of Kirk's townhall with Bari Weiss was 27% below the regularly scheduled programming for that timeslot.

Weiss is going to completely destroy CBS news within a year.

 

[USA!USA!]

I wonder how many "people grieve in their own way" posts are in this thread.

I know I frequently grieve by doing the moonwalk to fireworks at people's funerals.

Did you have your spouse's murder captured on camera and shared basically in real-time with the entire planet?

Not saying it's what I would do either.. but it's not like these are "normal" circumstances, or people. Doesn't make them less human though.

 

[deviake]

Did you have your spouse's murder captured on camera and shared basically in real-time with the entire planet?

Not saying it's what I would do either.. but it's not like these are "normal" circumstances, or people. Doesn't make them less human though.

Nah but I don't see how that changes anything and she's not the first person whose spouse has been killed on camera. The whole thing is weird.

 

[BAM]

Nah but I don't see how that changes anything and she's not the first person whose spouse has been killed on camera. The whole thing is weird.

I take it that pro-Israel republicans like Ackman and Trumpworld want to use her for their purposes. Whatever pressure Charlie was under, she'd be under more as it's blood in the water - she's vulnerable to manipulation.

She wants to evangelise, secure the bag, and to keep Charlie Kirk's memory alive. But, she has too many masters to please, doesn't understand politics, and is contorting herself trying to make it all work. So, she comes off phony and theatrical.

What she really needed to do was not accept the TPUSA CEO role, delegate that out to somebody political (as it's a political org really, not a Christian revival org), and just raise her grieving kids. Not hawk books, do a bunch of interviews, or take on Candace Owens, or steer TPUSA towards Israel.

Pro-Israel alligned right wing media is rallying around her all over the world in a synched up way trying to win this right wing proxy war with the anti-israel right wing influencers. They want to weaponise her tears and shift all this conspiracy talk away from Israel and back towards the left.

 

[USA!USA!]

Nah but I don't see how that changes anything and she's not the first person whose spouse has been killed on camera. The whole thing is weird.

You don’t see how that changes anything versus just having a private death in your family?

Your high-profile husband bleeding out in front of the entire world?

Lol - you’re just not being sincere. That’s fine - a lot of people just don’t like her, I get it. She’s not my favorite person either, I just don’t think it’s as simple as you are trying to make it.

 

[deviake]

You don’t see how that changes anything versus just having a private death in your family?

Your high-profile husband bleeding out in front of the entire world?

Lol - you’re just not being sincere. That’s fine - a lot of people just don’t like her, I get it. She’s not my favorite person either, I just don’t think it’s as simple as you are trying to make it.

It doesn't explain the strange behavior, no

 

[deviake]

I take it that pro-Israel republicans like Ackman and Trumpworld want to use her for their purposes. Whatever pressure Charlie was under, she'd be under more as it's blood in the water - she's vulnerable to manipulation.

She wants to evangelise, secure the bag, and to keep Charlie Kirk's memory alive. But, she has too many masters to please, doesn't understand politics, and is contorting herself trying to make it all work. So, she comes off phony and theatrical.

What she really needed to do was not accept the TPUSA CEO role, delegate that out to somebody political (as it's a political org really, not a Christian revival org), and just raise her grieving kids. Not hawk books, do a bunch of interviews, or take on Candace Owens, or steer TPUSA towards Israel.

Pro-Israel alligned right wing media is rallying around her all over the world in a synched up way trying to win this right wing proxy war with the anti-israel right wing influencers. They want to weaponise her tears and shift all this conspiracy talk away from Israel and back towards the left.

I concur, but I question her innocence; not in a necessarily conspiratorial kind of way, but generally. I wonder how deep in that world she was prior to his death. Being married to a dude like that, ya gotta have some exposure and a certain mindset I'd think.

 

[deviake]

I also think she has more agency than she's given credit for. This is a woman who's made choices with intention.

 

[BAM]

I concur, but I question her innocence; not in a necessarily conspiratorial kind of way, but generally. I wonder how deep in that world she was prior to his death. Being married to a dude like that, ya gotta have some exposure and a certain mindset I'd think.

a combo of compartmentalisation and cognitive dissonance is the best case scenario. Complicit in mass manipulation at the worst. Hard to tell with the evangelical MAGA folks - a lot of them are looking for deeper meaning and do a bunch of mental gymnastics to justify their greater good reasoning. But she's more a puppet than a mastermind. When she gave that "fear my widow's battlecry" speech, that felt like Stephen Miller wrote it to justify his crackdown plans. Nothing about this crap is organic.

She has a lot of agency and is wealthy and can walk if she really wants. I don't believe she needs this. Due to what happened to her husband, people have been giving her a lot of grace, especially after that forgivness speech at the memorial. But that can be spent real quick if her tears are used by others to justify horrible things in her name.

 

[Zazen]

She creeps me the fuck out honestly. Her eyes always look evil. Also I would never want my wife acting like this if I got murdered. Stay home and grieve with your children. She seems to enjoy being in the media. I’ve never seen someone put themselves out there so much after losing someone in a horrific manner. It’s so bizarre. Especially how she wipes non existent tears

 

[Seano]

Nah but I don't see how that changes anything and she's not the first person whose spouse has been killed on camera. The whole thing is weird.

"I don't see how that changes anything....."


At first , I'm like "WTF?" but then I guess I could see that you're the sort of person that doesn't have anyone to care about or anyone who cares about you.

 

[Roids]

She creeps me the fuck out honestly. Her eyes always look evil. Also I would never want my wife acting like this if I got murdered. Stay home and grieve with your children. She seems to enjoy being in the media. I’ve never seen someone put themselves out there so much after losing someone in a horrific manner. It’s so bizarre. Especially how she wipes non existent tears

It all looks so performative also. That ghoul make up wasn't by accident imo, I think she wanted to look intimidating. A very weird person like all of them from that group.

 

[Seano]

She creeps me the fuck out honestly. Her eyes always look evil. Also I would never want my wife acting like this if I got murdered. Stay home and grieve with your children. She seems to enjoy being in the media. I’ve never seen someone put themselves out there so much after losing someone in a horrific manner. It’s so bizarre. Especially how she wipes non existent tears

I'm glad you've been able to find some reason to hate this woman who's husbands was murdered. It'd be terrible if you had to be a decent human being for once in your life.