Crime Epstein List drop is in 3... 2... 1.... Tomorrow.

[Prefect]

You should cry. Show one post where I supported Pizzagate. You're a

The website should not allow Libel. It's not good for business.

For it to libel, you would have to prove that it is false. Good fucking luck with that. What is Trump going to do, release the Epstein Files to prove it is libel? People don't sue for libel when someone can make an argument to bring documents related to discovery for that lawsuit. Trump sued over being called a rapist because the court ruled him a sexual assaulter not a rapist so discovery wouldn't bring into question things like the Epstein Files. If he sued someone for libel, they could make the argument that the files are relevant to the case and bring them into the open. That is why absolutely no one mentioned in the files has filed one libel lawsuit. A lawsuit basically risk bringing it into the open, which would make it never go away.

 

[curryjunkie]

You should cry. Show one post where I supported Pizzagate. You're a

The website should not allow Libel. It's not good for business.

Have you appointed yourself hall monitor titties?

 

[Poon Goon]

You should cry. Show one post where I supported Pizzagate. You're a

The website should not allow Libel. It's not good for business.

Feels like this is an unprecedented case of whining over mean things being said about your hero. You've already admitted that he is covering for child abusers so I don't understand why this upsets you so much.

 

[WklySportsMemes]

Have you appointed yourself hall monitor titties?

What was his old username before he changed it due to embarrassment & getting caught in multiple lies in multiple threads?
WhipyMcgee or something like that?

 

[Blayt7hh]

You should cry. Show one post where I supported Pizzagate. You're a

The website should not allow Libel. It's not good for business.

Add libel to the list of concepts this bozo doesn’t understand

 

[DoctorTaco]

Have you appointed yourself hall monitor titties?

I hereby appoint myself as titty monitor

 

[Big Nasty Edison]

Evidence beyond accusations is required. The idiocy of "believe all women" is over. Why don't you believe Virginia Giuffre?

If you want to talk about circumstantial evidence, then... deal with this.

• Epstein donated 90%+ to Democrats
• Epstein advised Democrats what to say/do while Congress was in session
• Epstein hated Trump

If he had something on that proved Trump raped a child or woman, why wasn't it released? The Democrats literally did everything else they could to Trump, and Epstein was on their side... so why not?

No, you and your ilk will just ignore all of that.

Lol if I heard all this sus stuff about my neighbor I wouldn't talk to them, let alone elect them to lead the nation.

Oh and he admitted it. Just grab em by the pussy and start kissing. He said 12 year old Paris Hilton was hot. But you choose to ignore the man's own words. So the only logical conclusion is that you're ok with the things he's accused of.

 

[WklySportsMemes]

You should cry. Show one post where I supported Pizzagate. You're a

The website should not allow Libel. It's not good for business.

We are talking about a gas attack on women and children...This is not a partisan issue, but some people are such giant cunts, that they cannot help themselves.

Do you think Barack Obama cared about the children?

Young children do not need to be exposed to sexuality.

I just don't want him sniffing foreign dignitaries' children.

Creepy fucking Leftists. They are conditioning children and it's not healthy.

When we have teachers explain there fringe sexuality beliefs to children, the Left supports it.

When he starts having other people sniff children for him, that's when I will really worry.

Have you lost your mind? Do you know how much worse it is now? Do you know about the horrible massive escalation of lost children and child trafficking? You've bumped your damn head. I didn't think you were this clueless.

Until you realize child trafficking, rape, and murder is way worse under China Joe, you're a lost soul.

How can you possibly concentrate on the missing children ?

The Lefists would allow children to be sexually enslaved, Mossad and the CIA to get off the hook, and the men that raped women and girls remain free... all to keep Maxwell in prison.

While she is a scumbag and belongs in prison, I am for the greater good if these things could be stopped.

Who really supports the rape and enslavement of children? The Left. If they didn't, they would have been screaming for the border to be closed and secured while 10's to 100's of thousands of children were raped and sold into slavery under Biden's / Democrat's tenure. They would have wanted something done about Epstein while Joe Biden was in office.

Where was your outrage when children were being raped and enslaved by the thousands....

Where was your call for "Epstein's List..."

When you're too brain rotted to know that the Search feature is still tied to your old username.

How this complete hack is not banned for trolling about abnormal crimes against children I will never understand....

 

[Devil's_Advocate]

Anyone post this?

Trump accused of measuring kids' genitals with finger at 'auction' at Mar-a-Lago

WARNING - DISTRESSING CONTENT: President Donald Trump has been accused of measuring children's genitals with his fingers at Mar-a-Lago parties

www.irishstar.com

Absolutely insane.

"The document, published by the Department of Justice as part of the Epstein files on Friday, includes allegations from an unnamed person, who claimed: "He (Trump) measured the children's vulva and vaginas by entering a finger and rated the children on tightness." The guests at these parties were elder men and included Elon Musk, and Trump's eldest children, Don Jr., Eric, and Ivanka, the documents allege.

"We were taken in rooms, forced to give oral sex to Donald J. Trump," the unverified account continues. "Forced to allow them to penitrate [sic] us. I was 13 years old when Donald J. Trump raped me. Ghislaine Maxwell was also present."
"

 

[SurferH2O]

Libel requires the false claims to damage a persons reputation.

I can’t imagine the president of the United States reputation is being damaged by anonymous nerds on a karate forum.

It's the site's policy that will be on the owners. I never seen a site want that to be their look or liability.

 

[SurferH2O]

For it to libel, you would have to prove that it is false. Good fucking luck with that. What is Trump going to do, release the Epstein Files to prove it is libel? People don't sue for libel when someone can make an argument to bring documents related to discovery for that lawsuit. Trump sued over being called a rapist because the court ruled him a sexual assaulter not a rapist so discovery wouldn't bring into question things like the Epstein Files. If he sued someone for libel, they could make the argument that the files are relevant to the case and bring them into the open. That is why absolutely no one mentioned in the files has filed one libel lawsuit. A lawsuit basically risk bringing it into the open, which would make it never go away.

You don't know what the fuck you are talking about. It's on the person making the libelous claim to prove it true. You're ass backwards.

 

[SurferH2O]

When you're too brain rotted to know that the Search feature is still tied to your old username.

How this complete hack is not banned for trolling about abnormal crimes against children I will never understand....

You failed. Zero on Pizzagate. I never got involved in that. I was laughing reading my quotes, watching you fail. What an embarrassing waste of time for you.

Rent Free.

 

[Darkballs]

You don't know what the fuck you are talking about. It's on the person making the libelous claim to prove it true. You're ass backwards.

100% bullshit.

The burden is always on the moving party (the person filing the lawsuit) to prove both the tort and any damages. A defendant can rebut by showing it's true, but doesn't need to if the plaintiff failed to make a case in the first place.

So it would be completely reasonable for someone to conclude that donny 100% nailed kids and you don't care at all. And there is nothing either or you could sue me over.

 

[SurferH2O]

100% bullshit.

The burden is always on the moving party (the person filing the lawsuit) to prove both the tort and any damages. A defendant can rebut by showing it's true, but doesn't need to if the plaintiff failed to make a case in the first place.

So it would be completely reasonable for someone to conclude that donny 100% nailed kids and you don't care at all. And there is nothing either or you could sue me over.

No it's not. You're ignorant to the law. If you call someone a child rapist and you cannot prove it... you lose. They don't have to prove a negative. You're an idiot.

 

[WklySportsMemes]

You failed. Zero on Pizzagate. I never got involved in that. I was laughing reading my quotes, watching you fail. What an embarrassing waste of time for you.

Rent Free.

You sound like a 12 year old. I'd be careful at your MAGA cult meetings because....
Say, Drake, I hear you like 'em young / Tryna strike a chord and it's probably A minor".

 

[DoctorTaco]

It's the site's policy that will be on the owners. I never seen a site want that to be their look or liability.

if it’s not damaging his reputation then it’s not libel, regardless of who owns what websites.

 

[Absolut]

No it's not. You're ignorant to the law. If you call someone a child rapist and you cannot prove it... you lose. They don't have to prove a negative. You're an idiot

Since you are in Cali. Here is ca civil code on libel

Civ. Code § 45 defines libel as “a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him in his occupation.”

Here is caci 1700 on libel per se.

[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] harmed

[him/her/nonbinary pronoun] by making [one or more of] the following

statement(s): [list all claimed per se defamatory statements]. To establish

this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove that all of the following are

more likely true than not true:

Liability

1. That [name of defendant] made [one or more of] the statement(s)

to [a person/persons] other than [name of plaintiff];

2. That [this person/these people] reasonably understood that the

statement(s) [was/were] about [name of plaintiff];

3. [That [this person/these people] reasonably understood the

statement(s) to mean that [insert ground(s) for defamation per se,

e.g., “[name of plaintiff] had committed a crime”]]; and

4. That the statement(s) [was/were] false.

In addition, [name of plaintiff] must prove by clear and convincing

evidence that [name of defendant] knew the statement(s) [was/were] false

or had serious doubts about the truth of the statement(s).

Actual Damages

If [name of plaintiff] has proved all of the above, then [he/she

 

[Absolut]

It's the site's policy that will be on the owners. I never seen a site want that to be their look or liability.

Section 230 of the
Communications Decency Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. § 230) is a crucial U.S. law protecting interactive computer services (platforms, websites, ISPs) from civil liability for content posted by third-party users. It fosters online speech by treating platforms as intermediaries, not publishers, while allowing for the moderation of "objectionable" material.

 

[DoctorTaco]

It's the site's policy that will be on the owners. I never seen a site want that to be their look or liability.

if it’s not damaging his reputation then it’s not libel, regardless of who owns what websites.

 

[curryjunkie]

100% bullshit.

The burden is always on the moving party (the person filing the lawsuit) to prove both the tort and any damages. A defendant can rebut by showing it's true, but doesn't need to if the plaintiff failed to make a case in the first place.

So it would be completely reasonable for someone to conclude that donny 100% nailed kids and you don't care at all. And there is nothing either or you could sue me over.

I think it was yesterday or the day before he was claiming that he ran a legal Dept, he did say he wasn't a lawyer , so there's that..