• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Elections Election Fraud update V.2 - more evidence?

Saying there are leaning that way is an understatement, IMO. It is very particular coordination at this point.

They already had 120+ house GOP reps support the Texas case. Plus the 18-20 other GOP AGs.

Even got governor of FL saying stuff like this. This is same line from all the GOP senators yesterday in congress pretty much.



Even MI hearing with Dominion this week, they asked very specific questions, and the Dominion guy was basically blaming poll workers for irregularities. Well, in a place like GA, they have video of people breaking election laws. Even in the video with Gabriel Sterling, he acknowledges they should not have been doing that, despite his fat lesbian looking self saying NO FRAUD. That is a clear violation of law. Not to mention NV, AZ, and MI all have super high error rates that go to adjudication, which again, comes down to poll workers. And don't forget all the mail in ballots without signature verifications, etc.

Even with the GA recounts, you have affidavits with even more irregularities. Plus the recounts themselves didn't have a signature audit, among other things.

So if you present all this stuff together, and the democrats can only say "lol but the courts".... then January will be interesting indeed.


Well I'm thinking of Mitch McConnell and his not-too-veiled warning against his colleagues in objecting....I wonder how many there want to go up to him and tell him to go F himself harder than his wife does to him?
 
The justices havent met in nearly a year because of the virus. So how could they meet in a room? Use some common sense here.

You can stand to acquire some reading comprehension skills from where I sit.

I basically pointed out in the last statement that it was unlikely or did you forget how to read? <LikeReally5>
 
It's almost as if both sides of the spectrum have crazy people in it? Let's not forget most democrats still believe in the Russian Hoax even after now disgraced FBI director admitted they completely fucked it up and the entire FBI is to blame.
There. Was. Actual. Collusion...
 
What in god’s name are you talking about?

Anyhoo, if you’re hoping for an objection from a member of congress on Jan 6th, you’re going to have to explain how you think the House is going to uphold that objection for it to move forward. Are they bringing in alternate reps to vote on it? This is a show for their fans, that’s it. I’m sure Mr. Empty gesture himself Rand Paul will make that objection, though.

Did they not already send alternate electors in multiple states? Do the republicans not have control on a state by state basis?

A state government trifecta is a term to describe single party government, when one political party holds three positions in a state's government.There are currently 37 trifectas: 15 Democratic and 22 Republican. As a result of the 2020 elections, Republicans increased their trifecta total with a net gain of two trifectas. States with divided government—no trifecta for either major party—declined by two. Democrats neither gained or lost trifectas.

Plus the house itself have a 27-23 republican advantage after this election, and 26-24 prior.

As an aside, lol at Whitmer. She looks like someone who would be cast as a villain in a Tim Burton movie.

 
Yet you still posted it because you desperately hope its true

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit then. (CONFIRMED)

and besides, let's say if it's true, what does that accomplish?

The SCOTUS isn't going to turn around and look at the case that Roberts threw out.

I knew either way that ship had sailed.

And we've moved onto this current situation regarding the electors and what-have-you.

This, imo, could turn very ugly like Biden's pick for U.S. Secretary of Education, Charlotte Clymer. :confused:
 
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit then. (CONFIRMED)

and besides, let's say if it's true, what does that accomplish?

The SCOTUS isn't going to turn around and look at the case that Roberts threw out.

I knew either way that ship had sailed.
Ahh so you know its fake but you just want it to be out there to spread some more nonsene. Thats actually even worse than just a gullible trumper.
 
Ahh so you know its fake but you just want it to be out there to spread some more nonsene. Thats actually even worse than just a gullible trumper.

Wow. That's what you got, huh?

Reading Comprehension....an alien concept for some, I see.

That's okay. You'll get it one of these days. <Manning1>
 
even though you don't believe it, you have to put it in context with the process the GOP is trying to do, even without the support of people like Mitch (who I have always hated).

But look just here at Rep Jim Jordan. He already said he is ready to protest the electoral college vote on Jan 6. There are multiple others. Just his video on obscure news outlet, Newsmax, it has almost 500k views in less than 24 hours, his twitter feed has 100k views of his post of this segment. They just need one senator to go along and start the process on the 6th. The house is controlled by republicans on a state to state basis.

The left is going to need to at least have some counter argument, other than "oh but a judge didn't want to review the evidence, so it is proven false", if the GOP's plans go accordingly. So if it is NOT true, the left should be readily able to debunk it. It is based on raw data from the election, and I do not see anything debunking it yet (though it just came out). Just like with the NV evidence, no one has actually debunked the claims, other than a judge did not want to hear the case. Same with WI. In fact, the 3 republican justices in WI agreed with the case, which is why they had the lawyer in the senate yesterday, along with the NV lawyer.





And here is your senator, along with Rand Paul, Ron Johnson, among others. They havent committed yet, but this is a process.



To clarify the procedure for contesting electoral votes at this point: If both a member of the house and a member of the senate object to any state’s electoral vote, that state’s electoral vote would then be up for debate in both houses of Congress. For that objection to stand, it needs to pass with a straight voting majority in both the house and the senate.

The Democrats control the house, and since nobody’s actually claiming any of the state vote counts are incorrect, there’s no chance the house would ever sustain a request to reject the will of any state. The senate won’t either, but there are political reasons why some senators will vote to sustain an objection to state electoral votes if they’re on the record.

The number of states controlled by either party in the house is irrelevant unless neither candidate gets 270’votes, Biden has 306, and none have been contested by the states. No states have submitted alternate electors.
 
EpYVDPEXEAY9ALO
 
Did they not already send alternate electors in multiple states? Do the republicans not have control on a state by state basis?

A state government trifecta is a term to describe single party government, when one political party holds three positions in a state's government.There are currently 37 trifectas: 15 Democratic and 22 Republican. As a result of the 2020 elections, Republicans increased their trifecta total with a net gain of two trifectas. States with divided government—no trifecta for either major party—declined by two. Democrats neither gained or lost trifectas.

Plus the house itself have a 27-23 republican advantage after this election, and 26-24 prior.

As an aside, lol at Whitmer. She looks like someone who would be cast as a villain in a Tim Burton movie.


That’s not how it works. You’ve been reading too many fake Jenna Ellis texts. If there’s an objection backed by a member of the other chamber, the House and Senate will deliberate for two hours and vote on it. Both chambers have to pass it. Also, if by some miracle that happens, the alternate electors they choose would have to be legally certified state electors.
 
To clarify the procedure for contesting electoral votes at this point: If both a member of the house and a member of the senate object to any state’s electoral vote, that state’s electoral vote would then be up for debate in both houses of Congress. For that objection to stand, it needs to pass with a straight voting majority in both the house and the senate.

The Democrats control the house, and since nobody’s actually claiming any of the state vote counts are incorrect, there’s no chance the house would ever sustain a request to reject the will of any state. The senate won’t either, but there are political reasons why some senators will vote to sustain an objection to state electoral votes if they’re on the record.

The number of states controlled by either party in the house is irrelevant unless neither candidate gets 270’votes, Biden has 306, and none have been contested by the states. No states have submitted alternate electors.
I rate this post 100% true. Also they’d need real alternate electors with legal standing to replace Biden’s electors, not the fake ones they submitted.
 
You can stand to acquire some reading comprehension skills from where I sit.

I basically pointed out in the last statement that it was unlikely or did you forget how to read? <LikeReally5>

how do you go about getting yellow cards? definately not by shitposting i would imagine
 
Should be edifying.

John Michael Posobiec III (/pəˈsoʊbɪk/ pə-SOH-bik; born December 14, 1985)[1] is an American alt-right[2][3][4] political activist and conspiracy theorist[5] who is considered an Internet troll.[6][7][8][9] Posobiec is best known for his pro-Donald Trump comments on Twitter, as well as using white-supremacist and anti-semitic symbols and talking points, including the white genocide conspiracy theory.[10][11][12][13] He has promoted fake news, including the debunked Pizzagate conspiracy theory that high-ranking Democratic Party officials were involved in a child sex ring.[14] As of 2018, he was working as a correspondent for One America News Network, a far-right cable news television channel.[15]
 
Explain the hand recounts matching up. Quit acting like you are the only one that wants 100% accuracy that is what you Trumpers say to support your constant whining. Some kind of moral high ground. Fact is your guy lost and your whining about it and you drag down our democracy because your feelings were hurt , you Trumpers have no problem with it. For a group that likes to boast of their Patriotism your currently acting like a bunch of Seditionists, because Biden pushed your hero’s shit in on Election night.

When they 'adjudicated' votes, there was no oversight. Those 'new' votes were able to get changed to whatever they wanted. Because there is no name attached to ballot, votes could be shifted with impunity. The ballots could match the final count in many cases.

They didn't in Antrim County though.
 
As an aside, lol at Whitmer. She looks like someone who would be cast as a villain in a Tim Burton movie.


In the deadliest pandemic we've seen in over a century, absolutely. She is doing the right thing. We are experiencing the Thanksgiving surge with over 3k deaths a day now.

Dont know why MAGGOTs post this like people are gonna think this is wrong or something

 
When they 'adjudicated' votes, there was no oversight. Those 'new' votes were able to get changed to whatever they wanted. Because there is no name attached to ballot, votes could be shifted with impunity. The ballots could match the final count in many cases.

They didn't in Antrim County though.

Do you have anything other than what some guy said on twitter as proof there was no election official to adjudicate the ballots? A panel is required for adjudication. One dem and one Rep at a minimum but typically an independent observer.

Look what I found.

DID A FORENSIC AUDIT OF DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS IN ANTRIM COUNTY, MICHIGAN FIND A 68% PERCENT ERROR RATE?
No. Michigan’s Dominion voting system tabulators do not read ballots incorrectly 68% of the time. The so-called “forensic analysis” report that is being referenced, while ambiguous and technically incoherent in many places, does not even try to make this claim. The report is severely flawed, having been produced by Russell Ramsland Jr. of Allied Security Operations Group (“ASOG”), a firm with a history of spreading disinformation as part of error-prone affidavits for lawsuits (i.e. mistaking Minnesota for Michigan, for example). The Michigan Attorney General and Secretary of State categorically dismissed the report’s credibility, stating it is "critically flawed, filled with dramatic conclusions without any evidence to support them." A review of the “analysis” by any independent, federally-accredited Voting System Test Laboratory (“VSTL”) can easily refute this disinformation.

From.Michigan board of electors
Isolated user error in Antrim County did not affect election results, has no impact on other counties or states

The error in reporting unofficial results in Antrim County Michigan was the result of a user error that was quickly identified and corrected, did not affect the way ballots were actually tabulated, and would have been identified in the county canvass before official results were reported even if it had not been identified earlier. A more detailed explanation is available here.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top