Crime :eek::eek::eek::eek: Prince gets away with it

3. She is emotionally tired and doesn't want to go through a long drawn out legal process.
Thus valued the money over justice. If you value justice then you would push on. The heat has not even been turned up on her yet so to say she is emotionally drained at this point is a stretch.

I would have liked to see her put old Andrew through the ringer in court and see what else shook lose, but it was not to be.
 
No. But was hoping he’d spill the beans on some others that were also part of this shit. I guess I’m naive to think that would happen though.
Depressing indeed
I know man. With that witch in lockup and not Epsteined yet, I was hoping to see some of the scumbags that took part in it.

Is there an FOIA path anyone can take to see what investigators know?
 
I know man. With that witch in lockup and not Epsteined yet, I was hoping to see some of the scumbags that took part in it.

Is there an FOIA path anyone can take to see what investigators know?
I have no clue. I assume they would make a deal to make sure not of that can come out. It’s sickening.
 
When going up against someone with endless resources, you got to know when to take the best deal you can get. Plus, even if shes barred from speaking on it further, it still makes him look guilty af.
 
When going up against someone with endless resources, you got to know when to take the best deal you can get. Plus, even if shes barred from speaking on it further, it still makes him look guilty af.
You're right, but many other :eek::eek::eek::eek:s got off scott free (don't know if that's how it's spelled). The trial would have put the spotlight on other :eek::eek::eek::eek:s.
 
Thus valued the money over justice. If you value justice then you would push on. The heat has not even been turned up on her yet so to say she is emotionally drained at this point is a stretch.

I would have liked to see her put old Andrew through the ringer in court and see what else shook lose, but it was not to be.
You don't know what has been said to her. Maybe she was about the money but I wouldn't be surprised if they did everything they could think of to get her to settle.

And yes I would have loved to see him get dragged through court but I'm also painfully aware of how these things go.
 
I wanted other names in the limelight. I wanted testimonies who would wake up people.
I understand that and I would like that to happen too but that was never likely to happen in a civil trial with one defendant. The trial would only pertain to Andrew's actions. There wouldn't be much testimony, if any, regarding other rapists.
 
You're right, but many other :eek::eek::eek::eek:s got off scott free (don't know if that's how it's spelled). The trial would have put the spotlight on other :eek::eek::eek::eek:s.
I don't thinks so; not in a civil case. But maybe it'll inspire more lawsuits against more people who were in Epstein's orbit.
 
if someone said 5 years ago a murderous cabal of untouchable :eek::eek::eek::eek:philes rules the planet, people would yell conspiracy theory
well it was incontrovertibly proven to be so
what happened after this?
what happened after the Panama papers?

nothing.

"a murderous cabal of untouchable :eek::eek::eek::eek:philes rules the planet"

do "they" rule the planet? that is some claim you have just said was proven. lol.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
She is saying that she was forced to have sex with him, not by him but that he knew she was being sex-trafficked. And while he wasn't committing a criminal offence in Britain because she was 17 she alleged that he slept with her two other times on US territory when she was below the legal age of consent there. He has denied ever having sex with her.

Ok thanks for the information.
 
Back
Top