Subjective.
Dricus stopped Rob two fights ago, in a one sided drubbing.
He got by Sean in a close 25 minute SD.
If Khamzat wins, he's literally only fought one guy at MW - The guy Dricus just ran over.
The huge leap in logic that is required to justify Rob is more deserving of a title shot than Sean is only making DDP look like he is ducking and his fans with keyboards are not helping his argument. Look, I don't think Sean wins the rematch but it needs to happen so lets get it over with so nobody has to deal with SEan getting a title shot again. DDP seems very smart so its weird he is dismissing Sean's talent like he was able to figure him out. He has no problem talking about Izzy talent. Both Sean and DDP are a massive problem for the division and I am huge fan of both btw.I don't think it's that subjective. A better 3 fight win streak after dominant loss > a 1 fight win streak after a close loss, especially when that 1 win is against a guy that Rob just beat before strickland did.
i kind of agreee. strickland has sort of become a jorge masvidal since he beat izzy.
Whittaker wasn't healthy for that fight and never should have taken it. A rematch would look very differentLove Dricus, but it's easy to see why he's pushing this angle.
He ran Whittaker the F over just a couple of fights ago, and looked like he had been ran over after a highly competitive 25 minute split decision win with Sean.
I'd want the guy I beat easily over the guy who was super competitive with me as well. I'm betting it took a while for him to heal after that Strickland fight. His face was a mess.
Vetorri is nowhere near a title shot & Sean already beat up both Allen & ImavovHe’s right. If Rob beats Khamzat that will be three in a row including Costa, who Sean just beat. I think Sean should have to take another fight, either against Vettori or Allen-Imavov winner.
I don't think it's subjective either.I don't think it's that subjective. A better 3 fight win streak after dominant loss > a 1 fight win streak after a close loss, especially when that 1 win is against a guy that Rob just beat before strickland did.
You don't actually count to three and throw accusations out at others? Ridiculous.I don't think it's subjective either.
Whittaker's last three fights if he wins in october:
Aliskerov (unranked) who had about 1 week to prepare
Costa
#11 ranked Khamzat
Strickland last 3 fights:
Costa
DDP - this could've gone either way and probably should've been a draw
Adesanya
Not to mention Whittaker has already fought DDP and couldn't last two rounds.
Anybody who says Whittaker deserves it more than Strickland is a Whittaker or DDP fanboy
Allen is the dark horse that no one wants to talkHe’s right. If Rob beats Khamzat that will be three in a row including Costa, who Sean just beat. I think Sean should have to take another fight, either against Vettori or Allen-Imavov winner.
Doesn't matter....Will it? That would be his first ever ranked win at mw?
Tbf, I think Michi was talking about Khamzat in that reply of getting a title shot beating only one ranked MW in Rob.Doesn't matter....
Rob - 3 wins (Costa, Ikram and Khamzat)
Sean - 1 win (Costa)
How hard is this to understand?
I think three wins is better than one win. I'm no math whiz though. I could be way off.Doesn't matter....
Rob - 3 wins (Costa, Ikram and Khamzat)
Sean - 1 win (Costa)
How hard is this to understand?