Basically agree, yeah.
Tyson was very good, no doubt, but at the same time he developed something of a cult of personality as well.
Wilder is a difficult one to judge. Great punch, obviously, but who’re his best wins? Ruiz?
Any time people are dealing in extremes they are going to miss the mark.
Tyson and Wilder were both very good boxing champs. Not quite great in an all time status but 9 title defenses is nothing to sneeze at.
Tyson beat 5 of the champs that held the belt before him, Holmes, Plinkton Thomas, Tony Tubbs, Trevor Berbick and Michael Spinks.
Holmes, Berbick and Spink he fucking annihilated.
For any other boxer that alone would cement then as a great but Tyson gets graded on an impossible curve.
Tyson was a victim of his own success in that he gets called a champ of a weak era because the guys he beat never held the title because Mike had them all. In the 90s those belts got passed around like a hot potato so everyone was racking up these "big wins" over champs. Mike was beating the same 1-10 ranked guys of his era.
Mike will always be a "what could have been" if he stayed out of trouble, didn't go to jail, trained harder, etc. But he was still a damn good boxer in his day and even unified 2 of the major belts in his post prison run while well past his best.
Wilder... people like to try to sound cool talking shit about his boxing but he went 42 fights without defeat including 9 title defenses. KOed every man he faced that wasn't 6'9 monster freak Fury.
Fury draw was his best result imo. Some Wilder criticism is fair, a lot of it is bs imo.
He is one of the best KO artists ever and that takes more than power, like for example the defense to not get dropped in all those fights.