What aspect of the law do you think is responsible for the change? I'm telling you there's nothing that could have, but instead of telling you that something isn't there, why don't you just tell me what you believe is in there. And surely you realize that your experience is not typical, as healthcare-cost growth is the lowest ever recorded since the ACA took effect.
Also, you're derailing here. I came in to note that people who don't think morality or ethics are things that matter will never understand the opposition that decent people have here.
What repercussions are appropriate for not following State Department protocols and potentially risking getting hacked? Surely, whatever they are, they're not as bad as actually illegally hacking, are they?