- Joined
- Oct 11, 2012
- Messages
- 23,333
- Reaction score
- 12,310
Cheetah does not, but cheetah also doesn't have human intelligence and the ability to assess alternatives to specie propagation. Humans have imagination and self-awareness, and with that, the ability to imagine lives that do not involve procreation and all the attendant stress and lifestyle adjustments. If anything here is fucking retarded, it's your comparison of humans to cheetahs.
"Sufficient rewards" you speak of are neither guaranteed nor are they objectively rewards - they're purely subjective.
Poor people having kids all the time is by no stretch of the imagination an argument in favor of having a child. The quality of life you can afford your child should actually play a role in the decision to have one, that we need to argue about this in 2020 is beyond fucking insane.
Elicit. Also, I have literally no idea what this whole passage means.
You assign too much to human intelligence, is normal, you're a human and full of yourself. One could be talking about great apes, orca, humpback whales, all life that raises it's young.
Broadly speaking behaviours drive the creation of stories that explain them. Humans commonly are able to create stories and change their behaviours to fit them. As evidenced by how many obese people there are. There are obviously many non obese people who are just lucky to be slim also.
The rewards are subjective, of course they are. It's the subject that matters.
The quality of life of a poor child in our countries is amazing, it's just not as good relatively to the wealthy, possibly. Many poor people would disagree with your characterisation of their hideous existence. The most important things to a child are as in Maslow's hierarchy of needs, primarily the lack of abuse. Even the poor of my country can provide that for their children.