• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Do you support Roe Vs. Wade?

I believe in the non aggression principle. Initiating violence against anyone is morally wrong. Abortion is morally wrong. However, I am a voluntarist/libertarian, so I don't think it is acceptable to enforce my own views by the force of law. These questions of legality are better handled at as local a level as possible. People should have the freedom to choose how they want to judged by any authority.
 
Apparently if i stick my cock in a girl's mouth she can absolutely bite my cock off without any issue

Depends if she consented first of course ;)

Aside from cases of rape which is a very small amount of abortions per year all women consent to the chance of getting pregnant when they have intercourse.
 
If it's still in her body it's still her choice. Your melodramatic post delivery scenario would be murder.

If the 'baby' will live without the mother, abortion should not be allowed. I can't believe anyone would argue otherwise.
 
You really can't count my graph was for a 3 person household. Mom + Dad + Kid = 3 people. You have to use the number of people in the household to determine if they are in middle income. Can you count?

If someone has a kid, the mother or father in the least have to take care of the kid. So in the very least you have a 2 person household. Can you count?

If someone is living by themselves, they are part of a one person household? Can you count?

2a0kozm.jpg

http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2016...se-look-at-changes-within-metropolitan-areas/


So if a mother takes care of her kid, she needs to make $34,000 to be in middle income. If both parents take care of the kid, they need to make $41,641 to be middle income. This is well above 200% the poverty level. You don't get to use numbers without actually counting the kid. Even without the kid, the woman by herself at 2 x (Federal Poverty Level) = 2x 11,670 = $23,340 is below the cutoff for middle income. There isn't anyway to argue most women who get abortions are middle income. 59% already have at least one kid so there are a lot of women way below the poverty level prior to their first abortion.

aps_finals_demographics.jpg


Why are you moving back around from "oh, that is enough money" to "Women with kids get assistance - food stamps (what ever they call it now), housing assistance, sometimes free daycare, heating assistance, etc."? You blow off the hardship of being poor because often they get assistance. It is like you quit even yourself trying to argue that they are middle class.

Just so we're clear, the dad doesn't have a choice as to whether he's going to support the child so his income should be counted.

You can make all the excuses you want, but poverty is rarely a legit excuse.
 
Abortions could be made illegal but guns aren't going to magically disappear.
neither will women terminating pregnancies suddenly disappear. Looking at things in absolutes limits your understanding. Again, there have been people terminating pregnancies long before the gun was ever a concept. Same thing could be said for guns, I could fabricate my own gun if I so choose, it wouldn't be anything near as nice or accurate as something I could now purchase, but it will send a projectile down range.

From your statement I can also see you didn't bother reading, or you just completely dismissed the rest of what I said in which I am for gun rights, but I'm also for women's right to choose, basically I'm for individual liberties. I think we as a "free" society pulling this "respect my rights, but I get to take away yours" is complete bullshit regardless what some money grubbing whore quotes from some bullshit book.
 
Pills exist most abortions are made simply as a means to stop pregnancy. No tax should be put to use in such cases.

There is no reason outside life risk/rape for a woman to be aborting. ORGs that get public money to fund abortion should be completly eliminated.

These orgs are just a political means to get votes, power, with a cruel agenda.
 
neither will women terminating pregnancies suddenly disappear. Looking at things in absolutes limits your understanding. Again, there have been people terminating pregnancies long before the gun was ever a concept. Same thing could be said for guns, I could fabricate my own gun if I so choose, it wouldn't be anything near as nice or accurate as something I could now purchase, but it will send a projectile down range.

From your statement I can also see you didn't bother reading, or you just completely dismissed the rest of what I said in which I am for gun rights, but I'm also for women's right to choose, basically I'm for individual liberties. I think we as a "free" society pulling this "respect my rights, but I get to take away yours" is complete bullshit regardless what some money grubbing whore quotes from some bullshit book.

People won't stop robbing or raping either. Guess we should make those legal as well.

Killing your children shouldn't be anyone's right.
 
People won't stop robbing or raping either. Guess we should make those legal as well.

Killing your children shouldn't be anyone's right.
So you just justified banning guns, guns have been used to commit murders. Reducing the number of guns would reduce the number of murders the same way outlawing abortion will only reduce the number of abortions, not eliminate them entirely. Way to talk yourself out of your own argument.

Your "killing children" statement is just melodramatic sentimentality. If it's not your unborn child, it isn't your business. That's for the mother and possibly father to deal with. or in other words, you do you and let others do them, as long as it doesn't infringe on your rights or life what do you care. I personally don't.
 
pro Roe v Wade... Let women decide what comes out of their bodies
 
I believe in the non aggression principle. Initiating violence against anyone is morally wrong. Abortion is morally wrong. However, I am a voluntarist/libertarian, so I don't think it is acceptable to enforce my own views by the force of law. These questions of legality are better handled at as local a level as possible. People should have the freedom to choose how they want to judged by any authority.
I agree with this, personally I don't like the idea of an abortion, but who am I to tell a woman "you have to have that child, you need to incur the medical responsibilities for the duration of the pregnancy and raise it for the next 16 to 18 years if it's a healthy kid, if it's not healthy well then you better buckle up for the rest of your life taking care of that kid because it offends my moral sensibilities all because you let some guy stick his dick in you".
 
pro Roe v Wade... Let women decide what comes out of their bodies

a life is not a "what"

Pill works just fine and no public money should fund such idiocy

About 14% of all abortions in the United States are paid for with public funds—virtually all from the state (AGI)

http://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/

  1. Percentage Reason
  2. .001% The pregnancy resulted from an incestuous relationship
  3. .065% The woman's life was endangered by the pregnancy
  4. .085% The woman was raped
  5. .288% The woman's physical health was threatened by the pregnancy
  6. .294% The woman's psychological health was threatened by the pregnancy
  7. .666% There was a serious fetal abnormality
  8. 6.268% The woman aborted for social or economic reasons
  9. 92.330% No reason (elective)
 
I agree with this, personally I don't like the idea of an abortion, but who am I to tell a woman "you have to have that child, you need to incur the medical responsibilities for the duration of the pregnancy and raise it for the next 16 to 18 years if it's a healthy kid, if it's not healthy well then you better buckle up for the rest of your life taking care of that kid because it offends my moral sensibilities all because you let some guy stick his dick in you".

There is contraceptive methods, AIDS is out there, government should not be indulging abortion as means of contraceptive. Woman should understand the responsibility of being able to birth and stop letting dicks without condoms inside their vagina if they are off the pill.

Which is cost free btw in most of the world.
 
There is contraceptive methods, AIDS is out there, government should not be indulging abortion as means of contraceptive. Woman should understand the responsibility of being able to birth and stop letting dicks without condoms inside their vagina if they are off the pill.

Which is cost free btw in most of the world.
in an ideal world you are absolutely correct, but in an ideal world everyone wouldn't eat themselves to be gluttonous fat blobs either, people would not smoke and increase their chances of cancer, not take drugs recreationally that can cause damage or an overdose, people wouldn't drink and run the risks associated with alcohol related diseases or kill people in car accidents. There are a thousand things people could do that would be healthier and have less of a cost burden on society and the healthcare industry. Simple fact is that there will always be people that don't use contraceptive methods and there will always be people screwing around. The truth is poor people screw around more often than more affluent people because basically it's a cheap entertainment at face value. They rarely consider the ramifications, especially when the woman gets assurances from the guy that he'll pull out, he is wearing a condom or they both had too much to drink or are on some other mind altering substance. Also the vast majority of women that get abortions are just using it as a means of birth control, a majority of women that get abortions go through psychological issues associated with it.

Again, that's their choice, we must each atone for our sins but that doesn't give others the right to dictate if we can perpetrate those sins. How i personally feel about it or you feel about it is irrelevant, it's the individual that has to make that choice that matters, hence let them live with their choice but let them have a choice.
 
a life is not a "what"

Pill works just fine and no public money should fund such idiocy



http://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/

  1. Percentage Reason
  2. .001% The pregnancy resulted from an incestuous relationship
  3. .065% The woman's life was endangered by the pregnancy
  4. .085% The woman was raped
  5. .288% The woman's physical health was threatened by the pregnancy
  6. .294% The woman's psychological health was threatened by the pregnancy
  7. .666% There was a serious fetal abnormality
  8. 6.268% The woman aborted for social or economic reasons
  9. 92.330% No reason (elective)

None of those statistics matter to me. A women and a women only has the right to determine what or whom comes out of her body. Also, why does all this concern stop once the baby is born? Fetus = good must be saved, once born = damaged child so lets provide no social assistance and incarcerate
 
in an ideal world you are absolutely correct, but in an ideal world everyone wouldn't eat themselves to be gluttonous fat blobs either, people would not smoke and increase their chances of cancer, not take drugs recreationally that can cause damage or an overdose, people wouldn't drink and run the risks associated with alcohol related diseases or kill people in car accidents. There are a thousand things people could do that would be healthier and have less of a cost burden on society and the healthcare industry. Simple fact is that there will always be people that don't use contraceptive methods and there will always be people screwing around. The truth is poor people screw around more often than more affluent people because basically it's a cheap entertainment at face value. They rarely consider the ramifications, especially when the woman gets assurances from the guy that he'll pull out, he is wearing a condom or they both had too much to drink or are on some other mind altering substance. Also the vast majority of women that get abortions are just using it as a means of birth control, a majority of women that get abortions go through psychological issues associated with it.

Again, that's their choice, we must each atone for our sins but that doesn't give others the right to dictate if we can perpetrate those sins. How i personally feel about it or you feel about it is irrelevant, it's the individual that has to make that choice that matters, hence let them live with their choice but let them have a choice.

If there was no life on the line I agree wholehearted with what you just said, but considering there is a life on the line and how many feminist movements are pushing abortion as a life saving choice when is just an absurd contraceptive method I can´t agree with your stance.

If they want to sin at least use their own money and not tax payer.
 
None of those statistics matter to me. A women and a women only has the right to determine what or whom comes out of her body. Also, why does all this concern stop once the baby is born? Fetus = good must be saved, once born = damaged child so lets provide no social assistance and incarcerate

That is your mind in my mind we have a duty to offer good schooling and childcare to every citizen. If a country can´t manage that they have failed.

The woman can do anything but enough of the sob stories on how abortion is freedom, choice and feminism. Its just lazy human beings not being responsible with their own life and taking a short cut killing a life.
 
That is your mind in my mind we have a duty to offer good schooling and childcare to every citizen. If a country can´t manage that they have failed.

The woman can do anything but enough of the sob stories on how abortion is freedom, choice and feminism. Its just lazy human beings not being responsible with their own life and taking a short cut killing a life.

It is freedom. Also why are a bunch of old white men deciding who can get abortions and when they can get them? Isn't this a decision between a women and their doctor?

Can you imagine if men had children? Bwahahahahaha. We would be getting abortions every other year but since it's women...
 
If there was no life on the line I agree wholehearted with what you just said, but considering there is a life on the line and how many feminist movements are pushing abortion as a life saving choice when is just an absurd contraceptive method I can´t agree with your stance.

If they want to sin at least use their own money and not tax payer.
First off the life vs not a life thing is relative and subjective. Would the fetus survive outside the mother or if the mother died? If not, then it's not an issue to me, but that's a matter of perspective, I respect yours but apparently you don't respect mine........... that is the crux of the issue.

I don't know what percentage of tax money is used for abortion but I'm absolutely sure it's miniscule compared to how much is spent to kill living people in this country (people on death row or people killed by police) and internationally (military adventurism). Additionally, if it's a matter of paying to have a fetus aborted for a one time fee or paying for food stamps, welfare, education and any other number of things............ I'm taking the cheaper route. Again, that's my perspective I understand yours and respect it, but don't agree with forcing it on others.
 
Back
Top