- Joined
- Apr 18, 2016
- Messages
- 5,693
- Reaction score
- 7,153
If we still had a prime Rockhold, Weidman, Romero and Jacare, Izzy never becomes champ.
Now we are going to debate the difference between a KO and a TKO? Because one requires a single finishing strike and the other can be a whole variety of cumulative strikes (GNP for example).
A fighter beating a guy that absolutely no expected him to beat is a fluke. Just like Serra - GSP. It was even worse in this case because Rockhold already fought Bisping prior and brutally finished him. Plus it was short notice for Bisping as Weidman injured himself 10 days prior to the fight.
Rockhold was a -750 betting favorite going into that fight.
Are you really going to pretend anyone anywhere thought Bisping had even the most remote chance of winning?
What I'm saying is that a fluke, as you put it, would be like Dana selecting a drunken bum from the crowd who somehow knocks out the middleweight champion. A world class fighter who has been at the top for years does not meet my criteria for this dismissive term.
Perhaps you should have read his prior comments.
And frankly it was a fluke for a variety of reasons. First off, Bisping was a massive underdog given Luke absolutely thrashed him in their prior bout. He also took the fight on incredibly short notice. Him winning was not on anyone's radar. "an unlikely chance occurrence" hence a fluke....
More importantly. Bisping has never been known for KO power. In fact, he has zero finishes by strikes over top 10 opponents in the UFC other than Rockhold. ie good at beating scrubs but invariably losing to top guys or at best decisioning them. (Cung le might have been fringe top 10 when he lost to Bisping, can't recall).
I don't really have any clue what you are talking about in your comment. A retort would be more in line with challenging what you said but considering I don't understand it, there is no point.
I'll reiterate because you took the time to defend the idiot's position. I pointed out that Bisping's finish of Rockhold was a fluke. He posted gifs of other guys finishing Rockhold. Given I never indicated in any way, shape or form that any of the other finishes against Rockhold were "flukes" I don't know why he took the time to search for gifs but couldn't be bothered to read my comments. They were completely irrelevant.
Regarding (in your words, not paraphrasing here) "Bisping's best punch", given its his only KO finish in 29 UFC appearances, I wouldn't say there is anything "Best" about it.
Anyhow, please feel free to provide a suitably scathing response. I wait with baited breath...
Gee, I could have sworn I knew what "fluke" meant...
He has mentioned working a lot on his defense lately I believe he can fix it. It's not like he has a bad chin after all he only got Koed by Polish Power Romero and TRTitor in the UFC. Bisping was a funny one but accuracy and volume will get anyone.i want to, as one of the few big rockhold fans he just makes it extremely hard lmao.
dont think he’ll ever fix the defense/cockiness issue if he hasnt by now, he needs to learn to get these fights to the ground ASAP or stay at kicking range because his kicks are amazing and his ground game is fucking terrifying.
I believe in Luke. Being a successful male model, that is. I'm not sure he believes in himself as a fighter, any more.
He has zero instincts when staggered. He just freezes, arms down. Hugely talented, but he went away from his bread and butter - controlling distance and protecting that chin with kicks. And that particular flaw of freezing when hit is kind of a disqualifying one, in terms of staying among the elite.