- Joined
- Oct 11, 2011
- Messages
- 32,797
- Reaction score
- 0
It means she never stopped roiding.Meh. Diuretics aren't really the same thing as roids.
If you already have a roid bust, adding diuretics to the resume doesn't change things much.
It means she never stopped roiding.Meh. Diuretics aren't really the same thing as roids.
If you already have a roid bust, adding diuretics to the resume doesn't change things much.
Not GOAT even if she was clean as a whistle, no resume. Almost anyone who makes it to top 5 at BW is more of a GOAT since they fight in a real division and need an actual resume to make it that high.I am OK with Diuretics. Cyborg still goat.
I'm not drinking Kool Aid, I'm watching the fights and I'm not a drooling idiot.
Ronda Rousey? My idea of a GOAT can dodge a punch, move their head, move their feet, throw a kick, has efficient striking, shoot for a takedown. Ronda was just the starting point in a weak division until the real killers arrived. Rousey the greatest of all time LMAO in a 4 year old division jesus your standards are low...smhJoanna is #1 p4p right now, no doubt about that, but we all agree that Rousey is the woman GOAT right?
In case you are gonna post her loss to Holm let me remind you that almost every great champ have lost via KO, Fedor, GSP, Silva, Aldo... Jon Jones is the exception that proves the rule, or been submitted in less than a minute, Conor for example, but he's not a great champion since he doesn't defend belts, great fighter btw
I'll go even further, if she beats Nunes and then move up a weight class and beats Holm in a rematch (or Randamie), I'd consider her the Greatest Mixed Martial Artist Of All Time
Having world class striking and good grappling defense is more well rounded than having world class grappling and no striking defense. Joanna would beat the shit out of Rousey if they were the same size.Having world class striking and zero grappling offense is not more well rounded than having world class grappling and some striking offense.
Maybe she would beat Ronda, styles make fights (but maybe not since Joanna isn't as powerful as Nunes or as defensive as Holm), but Tate would "Holly" Joanna IMO and Ronda beat Tate twice. Anyway Joanna is more well rounded defensively, Ronda is more well rounded offensively.Having world class striking and good grappling defense is more well rounded than having world class grappling and no striking defense. Joanna would beat the shit out of Rousey if they were the same size.
Holly has been fighting as long as Ronda and Nunes has been fighting longer, they just hadn't fought each other until recently. It's more an issue of "styles make fights" than of evolution which is very overexaggerated.Ronda Rousey? My idea of a GOAT can dodge a punch, move their head, move their feet, throw a kick, has efficient striking, shoot for a takedown. Ronda was just the starting point in a weak division until the real killers arrived. Rousey the greatest of all time LMAO in a 4 year old division jesus your standards are low...smh
dont see the point youre making hereHolly has been fighting as long as Ronda and Nunes has been fighting longer, they just hadn't fought each other until recently. It's more an issue of "styles make fights" than of evolution which is very overexaggerated.
You wrote "Ronda was just the starting point in a weak division until the real killers arrived." Those "real killers" were there for as long as Ronda and have losses to opponents Ronda beat, they're just bad style matchups for Ronda.dont see the point youre making here
Really its just that you like to hump my leg a lot whenever I comment and dont like my opinions. Thats what they are opinions. When I state something and you correct me I admit when I am wrong but you follow me around like a weirdo to be honest lol, now that isnt an opinion thats a fact. If I want to say Ronda was nothing more than a starting point and one trick pony. I can, its an opinion of mine which I believe to be a fact. You dont have to like it. I stand by what I said. The killers just hadnt arrived yet. Bethe Correia, Sarah McMann, Liz Carmouche, and Kaufman, were good but not killers.You wrote "Ronda was just the starting point in a weak division until the real killers arrived." Those "real killers" were there for as long as Ronda and have losses to opponents Ronda beat, they're just bad style matchups for Ronda.
IOW you were overexaggerating "evolution" as people constantly do.
If you can't take somebody calling you out on your shit opinions, tough.Really its just that you like to hump my leg a lot whenever I comment and dont like my opinions. Thats what they are opinions. When I state something and you correct me I admit when I am wrong but you follow me around like a weirdo to be honest lol, now that isnt an opinion thats a fact. If I want to say Ronda was nothing more than a starting point and one trick pony. I can, its an opinion of mine which I believe to be a fact. You dont have to like it. I stand by what I said. The killers just hadnt arrived yet. Bethe Correia, Sarah McMann, Liz Carmouche, and Kaufman, were good but not killers.
lol goes to show how relevant your thoughts are when you have to disagree with somebody's opinion so badly. One of those people who stamps their feet when it strikes a nerve. Sorry if I hurt your feelings. The truth usually does.If you can't take somebody calling you out on your shit opinions, tough.