- Joined
- Oct 20, 2004
- Messages
- 129,761
- Reaction score
- 260,012
I would vote for John Cena / Haley Hawk-TuahConsidering her start in politics. Probably the Hawk Tuah girl
I would vote for John Cena / Haley Hawk-TuahConsidering her start in politics. Probably the Hawk Tuah girl
Quit lying dude you are better than this, I think. He's a fucking POS. you have a better chance of convincing me you dont shit your pants at this point
Nah I reject this, why should Democrats tolerate browbeating at the slightest hint of firing back when Trump has rejected civility politics as a matter of course and has been wholly supported by his party in doing so? At the end of the day even if Democrats use mean words and name calling there is no moral equivalence because Trump has denied the validity of the last election and even attempted a coup over those claims and in response the GOP has closed ranks to shield him from accountability for it. That is uniquely divisive and toxic for a democracy so I reject out of hand any attempt to equivocate that kind of divisive rhetoric with some campaign jabs.Assuming he doesn't die in the near future and knowing not everyone here is a total trump follower (@SKYNET isn't really imo) I think the onus is on everyone to do better, regardless what you believe happened in the last four years. Because, the next four years won't be any different either if there is no change
Right now, the parties and movements are so far apart that it's hard to see how someone doesn't have a clear preference, but it should be possible to do fair analysis anyway. Part of that, though, is admitting where you're coming from. People who don't do that are almost always trying to smuggle in partisan bullshit.Tim Pool calls (or called) himself a "moderate liberal" while endlessly trashing the left and carrying water for donald trump or other right wingers. That dude Sargon of Akkad had the exact same shtick for years (he used the term "classic liberal"), they see the benefit of giving the surface-level impression of impartiality with none of the responsibility of providing fair and objective analysis in their viewpoints/takes.
Well that is truly horrifying if you see nothing wrong with teachers trying to talk to your kids about their sex lives and spend time with them outside of school.
Are there any red flags you would pay attention to?
I mean the real "because" is just that he's a prominent political figure with the wrong letter next to his name.It seems like to me you're desperately trying to convince yourself to hate Tim Walz because he made a joke toward his political opponent based on a current viral internet meme because it's the cool thing to do in your boyfriend's call of duty discord.
I think civility is good, but clearly unilateral disarmament hasn't really worked. What I think a lot of people have been hoping for is for decent rightists to speak out against Trump, but it's turned out that the numbers there are pretty insignificant--at least of ones who both see the problem and have the courage to speak out about it. Interestingly, a lot of Dem Congresspeople have said that their Republican colleagues tell them stuff like "if you think I'm bad, watch what would happen if I were more civil and got primaried and replaced."Nah I reject this, why should Democrats tolerate browbeating at the slightest hint of firing back when Trump has rejected civility politics as a matter of course and has been wholly supported by his party in doing so? At the end of the day even if Democrats use mean words and name calling there is no moral equivalence because Trump has denied the validity of the last election and even attempted a coup over those claims and in response the GOP has closed ranks to shield him from accountability for it. That is uniquely divisive and toxic for a democracy so I reject out of hand any attempt to equivocate that kind of divisive rhetoric with some campaign jabs.
Can you explain how it's "backfiring big time"? She picked a running mate who hasn't faced any real scrutiny, and in just a few weeks it turns out everything about the guy is lie, from lying about his military rank, to being in war, to exaggerating the shit out of being a volunteer assistant coach, all the way to lying about how he had his kids to claim JD Vance is against IVF, which is itself yet another lie.More compelling than anything you have ever said.
FYI, you guys would be better off ignoring Walz and focusing on Harris. Attacking Walz has been backfiring, big time.
He would definitely hype that crowd upwell the RNC brought hulk hogan. the DNC better be bringing the great one.
![]()
Its going to be something ridiculous like WMJ? Yeah I don't think Pence wants more death threats hahaha but that would be quality.
Here is a photo of future Vice President Walz and a piglet!I mean the real "because" is just that he's a prominent political figure with the wrong letter next to his name.
You REALLY need to break out of your echo chamber. Tim Walz is the most favourably viewed politician in this race. You think your bullshit attacks are working. They are not.Can you explain how it's "backfiring big time"? She picked a running mate who hasn't faced any real scrutiny, and in just a few weeks it turns out everything about the guy is lie, from lying about his military rank, to being in war, to exaggerating the shit out of being a volunteer assistant coach, all the way to lying about how he had his kids to claim JD Vance is against IVF, which is itself yet another lie.
It's a toss up. It's ridiculous and sad to call him *the betting favorite " when you and I both know his campaign is in deep trouble.Trump is now the betting favorite again, so I'm not really seeing this "backfire" you're imagining, you mean it just personally bothers you when democrats are criticized and called out for lies and creepy behavior.
I don't know who MJ or W are, haha.He would definitely hype that crowd up
Its going to be something ridiculous like W
Michael Jordan or Bush. Neither seem plausible.I don't know who MJ or W are, haha.
Sex ed in middle school now includes graphic lessons on anal sex, oral sex, and masturbation, with stick figures to illustrate body positions. Supplemental reading in middle school libraries includes "Sex, Puberty, and All That Stuff," a book explaining foreplay and how to rub the clitoris to produce pleasure. Massachusetts' curriculum tells seventh graders how to use cling wrap as a dental dam around their teeth for safe oral sex.Well, what does "talking about their sex lives entail"?
Were they talking about how to prep an asshole for gay anal sex? If so, I concede the debate and I agree with you.
Or were they talking about how to deal with bullying and providing a safe place for LGBT kids to exist in the fuckin 90s? If so, I think you're misframing the situation to fit your agenda.
And we think the LGBT club Walz headed was a sex ed class?Sex ed in middle school now includes graphic lessons on anal sex, oral sex, and masturbation, with stick figures to illustrate body positions. Supplemental reading in middle school libraries includes "Sex, Puberty, and All That Stuff," a book explaining foreplay and how to rub the clitoris to produce pleasure. Massachusetts' curriculum tells seventh graders how to use cling wrap as a dental dam around their teeth for safe oral sex.
Eugene, Oregon, high schoolers were recently assigned to write a sexual fantasy featuring massage oil, flavored syrup, a candle, music, feathers or a boa.
to add to that
review of 60 studies of sex education in U.S. schools, published in the scholarly journal Issues in Law and Medicine, found that comprehensive sex education more often resulted in more harm, including more unplanned pregnancies and STDs.
? No.And we think the LGBT club Walz headed was a sex ed class?