- Joined
- May 27, 2009
- Messages
- 37,294
- Reaction score
- 38,532
Why do you have an opinion about abortions ?
Why do you have an opinion about abortions ?
Why do you have an opinion about abortions ?
Answering a question with a question, I accept your relinquishment of the point, as it is clear you have conceded.Do you have a opinion that isn't a billionaire's?
Answering a question with a question, I accept your relinquishment of the point, as it is clear you have conceded.
You're right. She's incredibly clever like every other lawyers. She passed the bar. It's the ultimate proof.She's in all likelihood more intelligent than the majority of federal elected officials in the executive and legislative branch. There's plenty of positions you can criticize her for or even dumb ideas or comments, but it's baffling to describe a lawyer who passed what's considered the toughest bar exam "dumb" when compared to the majority of senators and reps.
this is why the republicans could never do a dnc type roll call cause all the artists would be pissed they are playing their musicAgreed,
The bar has been set from here on out.. That damn Roll Call could have been a PPV event.
Can you imagine in 4 years from now, all of the young Democratic voters coming of age purchasing tickets just to see the roll call.
What is that based on? The majority of the senate are also lawyers, 5 are medical doctors, 4 have PHDs, 20 have masters degrees. Harris' law school isn't ranked in the top 80 and she failed the bar exam. California has a lower passing rate for the bar exam now, and they also have the lowest literacy rate in the country, but the pass rate was nearly 60% when she failed it. If you're some legal wizard, you're probably not working as an assistant in the DA's office in Oakland.She's in all likelihood more intelligent than the majority of federal elected officials in the executive and legislative branch. There's plenty of positions you can criticize her for or even dumb ideas or comments, but it's baffling to describe a lawyer who passed what's considered the toughest bar exam "dumb" when compared to the majority of senators and reps.
Nothing, I guess. Seems odd that mentally ill unmarried women make up most of the leftist voting block, but that’s the system.And what's wrong with that, pray tell?
Should single women vote for someone who brags about taking away one of their rights?
Glad that you are able to use a thesaurusAnswering a question with a question, I accept your relinquishment of the point, as it is clear you have conceded.
You're right. She's incredibly clever like every other lawyers. She passed the bar. It's the ultimate proof.
"but it's baffling to describe a lawyer who passed what's considered the toughest bar exam "dumb" when compared to the majority of senators and reps.":
Percent of Elected Members of Congress Who Are Lawyers from Different Regions of the United States
![]()
"From Abraham Lincoln to Barack Obama, lawyers have long been associated with elected office in the United States. In fact, since Independence, more than half of all presidents, vice presidents and members of Congress have come from a law background. Yet, in a recent working paper titled “The Declining Dominance of Lawyers in U.S. Federal Politics,” I show that lawyers’ once unquestioned supremacy in federal elected office is in a slow but steady retreat. In the mid-19th century, around 80 percent of the U.S. Congress were lawyers. By the 1960s, this number had dropped to about 60 percent. Today, just under 40 percent of the U.S. Congress are lawyers." (source: https://clp.law.harvard.edu/knowledge-hub/magazine/issues/lawyers-in-politics/declining-dominance/)
But you must be right. Being a lawyer proves Harris is clever.
Remember this woman?
![]()
She's so intelligent she forgot to file the right paperwork. She forgot to object at the right times. She forgot a lot of things. I'm pretty sure she passed the bar.
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/599744-four-gop-senators-who-should-go-back-to-law-school/
![]()
Dan was a lawyer. Dan was a VP. Dan was therefore a genius. (I love this pic btw. The blank stare just screams genius.)
What a coherent argument and not just partisanship. Odd you think I believe that despite having voted against her more than once and not being a fan of hers.We get you think she’s hot. Good night.
not necessary i am fucking drunk.you want to get bitch slapped?stop this cycle of hate bro ! we need @idrankyourbeer to come in, your stealing his gimmickn
Big mike appreciates this sirnot necessary i am fucking drunk.you want to get bitch slapped?
Your post is just a waste when DJT and the Republican party have openly called for defunding the FBI. What's your view on that?
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow...ns-open-defunding-fbi-keeps-growing-rcna73589
“We back the badge—just not the ones protecting the Capitol.”
“We love law and order—just not when Trump is convicted of felonies.”
this gave me a new respect for Bruce Springsteen
interesting they need ID's, walls/barriers and extra police at DNC. All that is to protect them from their own base lolHypocrisy on both sides.
Defund the police, but thank God that they were there Jan 6th
I strongly suspect that the reason the phrase “what can be, unburdened by what has been” makes no sense to conservatives is because for them, “what has been” wasn’t a burden—it was the glory days. The GOP is pretty much obsessed to returning to “what has been,” that other groups found burdensome.only a person who has NEVER had a cognitive or spiritual awakening cannot fathom what the phrase unburdened by what has been means. I mean that. you have to be a psychological CHILD to mock such a statement. it is absurd to me that NONE of you can comprehend a radical or even gradual awakening. its nearly criminal. ALL of you will pass on ALL of the suffering you have to your children.
you are not qualified to analyze life.