I honestly cant believe people think she has a chance.
SHes the only candidate where when people argue for her I have not heard a single solid stance she has, just that she could be the first women president. Someone said she's the idiot vote, and its so fucking true.
Shes an absolute dreadful candidate.
A few things:
-She is going to go through the primaries possibly uncontested. This means raising money for GE instead of primary opponents. There are pros and cons to this but the money is a nice edge for the GE.
-If Jeb is on the other side, she has a significant chance of winning cause there won't be a choice at something new.
-She has the best resume of either side. This doesn't mean you will or won't be a good president, but you can't deny her credentials.
-Her and the media that supports her are going to be able to claim sexism if a GOP candidate goes to hard on her during the debates. They already are portraying Rand as a sexist. This likely will backfire but I doubt it. They couldn't do it to Obama cause he was a minority candidate. It would've looked silly.
-Also, yes. She will be able to run on first woman president. Winning the female vote well enough could alone win her the election.
Can't count her out. I think she will fail but I still don't think she has no chance.
What credentials exactly? Her failed time as secretary of state? She's riding off her husbands credentials. SHe hasnt done anything.
I honestly cant believe people think she has a chance.
SHes the only candidate where when people argue for her I have not heard a single solid stance she has, just that she could be the first women president. Someone said she's the idiot vote, and its so fucking true.
Shes an absolute dreadful candidate.
Cross former Mass. Gov Deval Patrick off any potential running mate list as he accepted a gig with Bain Capital. Hell I think it's safe to say he will never run for public office again - which he did say was his plan all along - a promise to his wife. I assume she wants to live the high life, and no doubt Patrick cashed in with his Bain gig.
Why Warren? It's line Obama but more progressive. Just why?
Do people actually want an ultra progressive president? Is that the liberal agenda?
rshawneecarbon1 needs to stop dumbing down the discussion. This thread's for people who aren't idiots.
Anyway, today I read an article that's making the slow and painful realization that Hillary is probably the best choice a bit less painful:
There
rshawneecarbon1 needs to stop dumbing down the discussion. This thread's for people who aren't idiots.
Anyway, today I read an article that's making the slow and painful realization that Hillary is probably the best choice a bit less painful:
There
![]()
Forget about the Arkansas days, the small-bore scandals, her health care plan and most everything else from the 1990s. A consensus is forming within the Republican Party that the plan of attack against Hillary Clinton should be of a more recent vintage, rooted in her accumulation of wealth and designed to frame her as removed from the concerns of average Americans.
With close to 20 announced and prospective GOP candidates in 2016, there
Its shocking that its April 2015 and people are already mentioning the Supreme Court as the reason to vote for a nominee. You are supposed to be in the "building excitement phase" right now.
![]()
Hillary Clinton has found a new constituency: Republicans.
A significant
![]()
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio is standing by his remarks on
I don't understand. Are only liberal justices expected to step down after 2016? If so, don't you think they will step down before the election for Obama to make appointments?
I don't understand. Are only liberal justices expected to step down after 2016? If so, don't you think they will step down before the election for Obama to make appointments?