- Joined
- Jul 21, 2015
- Messages
- 11,381
- Reaction score
- 14,521
I listened to the Sheehan show (see Sherdog FP). He was explaining that damage is now the main criteria in judging to get a 10-8 round. He said before that control or striking volume COULD get you a 10-8 but now those really won't be factors.
So of you take a guy down and control him for an entire round but don't damage your opponent you're getting a 10-9.
For the pillow fisted pitter patters that touch their opponents way 70 times in a round and their opponents don't do much to them they are getting a 10-9 (a Colby vs Robbie situation imo).
Damage AKA hurting your opponent is the main criteria.
I agree. I like it. The point is to hurt your opponent so much they can't continue and the fight doesn't go to the judges.
How does everyone else feel?
It's been this way for a while now.
Biggest recent example was Yana vs Ketlen Veira in round 3.
Yana had 4:15 of ground control in the round, but she landed no sig strikes and less than 10 normal ones, while landed 55 weak strikes while being controlled. Then Yana gets up in the final seconds and lands 5 or so sig strikes and busted Ketlen open.
Yana lost that entire round, but won abut 5 seconds of it and did more damage in that time. 2 judges gave her that round just for that. Imagine how easy it would have been to get a 10-8 if she'd been the one in control and had steadily dished out damage all round.