Opinion Criticize your own party/side

So what's the deal with saying that people having children causes a spread of "dregs"?

I didn't. I said abortion reduces the spread. Poor people overwhelmingly make up the biggest percentage of abortions. At roughly 500k procedures per year overall, it's the cheapest and most effective
 
I didn't. I said abortion reduces the spread. Poor people overwhelmingly make up the biggest percentage of abortions. At roughly 500k procedures per year overall, it's the cheapest and most effective
Do you think poverty is a genetic defect? What's the idea behind "the spread", anyway? How does that work?
 
Nothing really. Democrats actually won a presidential election (remember that in America, it is almost impossible to have an ideological extremist president), and the portion of the left that opposes any actual action got mad about it.
I don't see it either, but I'm hoping he has an interesting answer.
 
Do you think poverty is a genetic defect? What's the idea behind "the spread", anyway? How does that work?

Poor people who can't afford their spawn. Instead of having the burden of another human to pay for, they have the option to terminate it before it's an issue. Hence aid in stopping the spread.

Are you in favor in higher taxes to pay for poor people's kids? Are you anti abortion in general or just when you point out the economic benefit?
 
Are you in favor in higher taxes to pay for poor people's kids? Are you anti abortion in general or just when you point out the economic benefit?
I'm in favor of not raising taxes and still helping out our own people. I'm against importing the solution to a declining population from 3rd world countries
 
Top Republican Presidential nominee is under indictment on 91 Charges for refusing to relinquish power, being a gigantic fraud, and keeping State secrets for personal use...current House Speaker voted not to certify the last election
Yeah yeah, I already mentioned they need to take their losses like grown ups. Its funny how its only a "threat to democracy" when republicans do it though.

Republicans all over the US attempting to further gerrymander maps so egregiously the very conservative Supreme Court told a State to knock it off and now another State is also ignoring Court mandates for less unfair redistricting.
Are you seriously acting like the democrats don't gerrymander?
FBwUwKtWUAAuVMy
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cancel_culture

It's a stated goal of most social media platforms and the current administration

If you just mean social disapproval for views, of course that has always happened and always will and should. But people should also be free from legal consequence for giving their opinions. And that's a mainstream left position.

"Mainstream liberals" = neoliberals hired by mainstream media I presume

No, "mainstream" means just normal people who make up the majority of liberals.

"Nutter left" = ? Not even sure what you mean by this. The people who aren't "mainstream"?
Are the antiwar journalists that MSNBC fired after 9/11 what you consider the "nutter left"?
Maybe the fact you don't think of them as mainstream explains the dynamic you are trying to communicate.

Good piece from Noah Smith that recently kind of gets into defining the portion of the left I'm referring to: https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/the-american-socialist-worldview-4aa.

It's because of the arguments you are making and the consistent shilling. Note, I don't shill for Bernie the way you do for Biden. I liked some of his ideas and I voted for him. I don't defend him tooth and nail on everything he does.

Again, this is just a not-very-plausible lie. I have never shilled for Biden, and I have criticized him much more than you've criticized Bernie, though I don't buy wild stories about him taking bribes or being senile or whatever other loony claims are out there.

No, you havent. Your biggest critique of the Democratic party is that they occasionally virtue signal about corruption in politics. Oh, and getting our "future" out of financial ruin. Your exact ideology is why the Democrats lose every other election. They need to ignore people like you and do things that everyday average Americans would agree with. There's no excuse for polling 50/50 against Trump.

Again, I don't care if you agree with me (or really what you think about anything). You asked about where I disagree with Democrats, and I gave some examples.
 
I think right or left, we don’t have enough congresswomen willing to jack dudes off in public.
 
Fuck parties. As an atheist liberal non westerner, i have to go with the right in the US because western right is centre-right at most in the rest of the world but western left is out of this world stupidity. And considering how western leftist supports the most conservative non-westerners in the name of shits like ''respecting the culture'', ''standing against islamophobia'', they are technically my enemy.
Yeah this has nothing to do with this thread but i hate western leftists so much i can't stop talking shit to them. Cancer of the world.
 
My party would be market-oriented Georgist YIMBYs, who favor strong protections for civil liberties, a large SWF, low deficits during good economic times, strong stabilization policies during recessions, and anti-poverty programs targeted toward children and the disabled.

Doesn't exist, though one major U.S. party is clearly better than the other.
 
Are you seriously acting like the democrats don't gerrymander?
FBwUwKtWUAAuVMy

That's not at all what I was doing and you know it.

Democrats have not been successfully sued in front of the SCOTUS for their gerrymandering, and then IGNORED the SCOTUS order to hard a Special Master had to be installed. Democrats arent so worried about their districts that they're threatening to impeach elected State Supreme Court Justices who have publicly said the gerrymandering was an issue. Democrats dont have a recent very defined History of doing everything they can to thwart popular votes in multiple States
 
Last edited:
Not dirty enough for Mr. Holmes...
210610-capitol-insurrection-getty-773.jpg
Boring!

How about:
  • Using the FBI to spy on your opponent
  • Setting up DOJ slush funds for friendly activist groups
  • Using the IRS to target your opponents
  • Paying for fake dossiers that lead to years long investigations (that went nowhere)
  • Using the DOJ to intimidate parents at PTA meetings
  • Pressuring social media to censor unfavorable content
  • Running to sympathetic courts to constantly block executive orders (which later get reinstated after an appeal)
  • Having a cabal of elites and billionaires fortify an election
Its weird how that 1 bullet received so many replies. <Moves>
 
If you just mean social disapproval for views, of course that has always happened and always will and should. But people should also be free from legal consequence for giving their opinions. And that's a mainstream left position.

No I'm not talking about "social disapproval for views". I'm talking about censorship. You know this. If YouTube cared about social disapproval they wouldn't have disabled dislikes at the behest of corporations.

No, "mainstream" means just normal people who make up the majority of liberals.

Medicare for all polls pretty highly among liberal normal people. As does raising the minimum wage. As does the things you claim to disagree with the "nutter left" on like getting money out of politics and canceling student debt. Please explain exactly what separates the "nutter left" from "normal people." I guess I'm missing the distinction.

Good piece from Noah Smith that recently kind of gets into defining the portion of the left I'm referring to: https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/the-american-socialist-worldview-4aa.

I'm not a socialist.

Again, this is just a not-very-plausible lie. I have never shilled for Biden, and I have criticized him much more than you've criticized Bernie, though I don't buy wild stories about him taking bribes or being senile or whatever other loony claims are out there.

This is a flat out lie. Feel free to list your criticisms of Biden here and I will list my criticisms of Bernie in response. I will obviously win, because you are a disingenuous person.

Again, I don't care if you agree with me (or really what you think about anything). You asked about where I disagree with Democrats, and I gave some examples.

Your "examples" were absolutely pathetic. You listed things that the Democratic party has not actually accomplished. Getting money out of politics? They haven't done shit. Canceling student loan debt? They haven't done shit. You are listing things that various politicians have virtue signaled about that have never actually happened. Do you genuinely not disagree with anything Democrats have done?
 
Last edited:
The Libertarian Party allowed left wing idiots ro run the party into the ground for too long. Since the Mises Causus annihilated them and took over, it has been a lot better, but it should never have been allowed to get so bad in the first place.
 
Never understood why Conservatives are so anti-abortion.

If a woman doesn't want a kid, let her get rid of it. If she doesn't want a kid ad is forced to have it against her will, more than likely, she'll probably end up being a shitty mother and the kid will be a burden to society and contribute to a higher crime rate than we already have.

I argued with a Republican about this before and he said "You never know, that child could grow up and be a doctor and save your life." my response was "Yeah, he could also grow up and slice your throat for the $20 you have in your wallet"

It's retarded. True conservatives recognize that while abortion is evil, it should be allowed because the alternative is having the state in control of people's bodies which is a far greater evil.
 
Back
Top