• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Cory Sandhagen has gotten worse

JustBleed69

Touch-Butt Silver Belt
@Silver
Joined
Mar 7, 2015
Messages
12,329
Reaction score
11,941
Over time Sandhagen has gotten worse as a fighter. His grappling has definitely improved a lot since the Aljo & TJ fights, however, his striking offense has become extremely muted.

Watching his early UFC fights he was a movement heavy volume boxer-striker that would overwhelm guys with his offense. He had great boxing; I loved watching him jab, work the body, the go back upstairs, and so on.

Now he tends to play it pretty safe, stay in kick boxing range, throw low kicks, & mix in some reactive takedowns. He is just overall way less offensive than he once was & I think it has ultimately cost him at times.

He's definitely one of the more cerebral types in his approach to the game that I can absolutely appreciate, but sometimes I think over-analyzing it can lead to worse results at the end of the day.

What do you guys think?
 
Last edited:
Yeh he’s past his prime.


Y’all saw how aljo did him
 
It happens to literally everyone, you get better then you decline.
 
I feel Sherdog needs an emoji of this dude.
https://i.giphy.com/aaf60OeQQpCiQOUPKf.webp
 
his grappling cost him against tj and then he decided to work on that.

against a grappler he ins't good enough.

in striking he can go to to toe with omalley but will likley grapple him. the ufc doesn't want to give him a title shot because of that
 
I don't think he got worse, but he did become a more boring and safe fighter.

His wrestling and grappling have drastically improved over the last few years, and it showed against Umar.

Cory doesn't really have a great way of finishing elite opponents though. To be fair, he probably deserved a title shot instead of fighting Umar, maybe he does better against O'Malley.
 
He's had a couple injuries since the "peak" you're talking about, and those are just the ones publicly disclosed. Guys can also become more risk-averse when losing big fights to controversial decisions (v Dillashaw).
 
Gives me a Rose vibe. So much talent, but we just don't see him using it.

Wow... I made the exact same connection.

Following a game plan with absolute discipline even if it leads to defeat. And I'm not throwing shade on either fighter...

I do think if either fighter was "forced" into a fire fight they would respond magnificently... But opponents know that and avoid it.

Dude responded well on the ground and really had his opponent frustrated... But standing was surprisingly conservative and led to minimal damage.

Blaming the corners and game planning... It could be cured but probably won't be for either fighter.
 
Over time Sandhagen has gotten worse as a fighter. His grappling has definitely improved a lot since the Aljo & TJ fights, however, his striking offense has become extremely muted.

Watching his early UFC fights he was a movement heavy volume boxer-striker that would overwhelm guys with his offense. He had great boxing; I loved watching him jab, work the body, the go back upstairs, and so on.

Now he tends to play it pretty safe, stay in kick boxing range, throw low kicks, & mix in some reactive takedowns. He is just overall way less offensive than he once was & I think it has ultimately cost him at times.

He's definitely one of the more cerebral types in his approach to the game that I can absolutely appreciate, but sometimes I think overthinking it can lead to worse results at the end of the day.

What do you guys think?
Umar deserves his flowers...I really didn't think Sandhagen was ever going to hold the belt, he is a top 3 guy in the division at his best.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top