Law Coronavirus the US GOV'T Response analysis Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Revolver said:
Click to expand...

Are the caravans invading?

giphy.gif
 
andnowweknow said:
I personally don't think he should have done that but your argument that it was a good idea probably has merit.
Click to expand...

I made no such argument, but you know that. Just pointing out the hysterical left immediately taking it to “what did he get in in return?!” like it was some nefarious plot they uncovered with their super investigative skills.

And lol at “17 TONS!”

I just bought and moved 1.5 TONS of stones for my backyard myself using a Nissan Frontier. Acting like 17 TONS is some huge deal for countries the size of the US and China. Just lol.
 
Bloody Pulp said:
I made no such argument, but you know that. Just pointing out the hysterical left immediately taking it to “what did he get in in return?!” like it was some nefarious plot they uncovered with their super investigative skills.
Click to expand...
Well to be fair, the tweet didn't say anything about impeachment nor was it in any way suggesting anything unreasonable or reflexively odd...
 
andnowweknow said:
Well to be fair, the tweet didn't say anything about impeachment nor was it in any way suggesting anything unreasonable or reflexively odd...
Click to expand...

I added an edit to the post you quoted, just as an FYI.

the tweet clearly wanted to imply there was some sort of nefarious quid pro quo going on. Because trump is a “transactional creature” and must’ve gotten something in return (help for his re-election?!)
 
Bloody Pulp said:
I added an edit to the post you quoted, just as an FYI.

the tweet clearly wanted to imply there was some sort of nefarious quid pro quo going on. Because trump is a “transactional creature” and must’ve gotten something in return (help for his re-election?!)
Click to expand...
He's not a transactional creature? Even the Republicans in the Senate who acquitted him admitted he was involved in a quid pro quo exactly as you're describing...are you saying the tweet was suggesting something unlikely?

It wasn't some suggestion out of left field, it's exactly in line with how we know Trump operates...or do you disagree?
 
andnowweknow said:
He's not a transactional creature? Even the Republicans in the Senate who acquitted him admitted he was involved in a quid pro quo exactly as you're describing...are you saying the tweet was suggesting something unlikely?

It wasn't some suggestion out of left field, it's exactly in line with how we know Trump operates...or do you disagree?
Click to expand...

im saying it is trying to imply something nefarious is going on with sending the aid stuff to China.

and no, my first instinct isn’t to go to “but what did he get back?!” Any time the admin sends aid or whatever else to another country.
 
How has the US dropped the ball so badly on this? More than 25% more cases than any other country. We knew it was coming but were flat footed none the less.
 


Trumps body language says everything......he does not give a crap about anyone but himself....
 
HomeCheese said:
How has the US dropped the ball so badly on this? More than 25% more cases than any other country. We knew it was coming but were flat footed none the less.
Click to expand...

Indeed.

Gross, and as literally just said elsewhere...

ffp.png


<KingstonFrown>

wt.jpg
 
Reliable Sources this morning.. A decent enough conversation going with a bunch of obvious feminists, talking about the conditions in hospitals, and how more transparency might be necessary. I was waiting for it, however; you know it's coming, and you can feel them wanting to go into delusional politics la-la-land at all times. It's very uncomfortable. So alas, when one of the feminists used her normal brain and mentions "local governments" and what responsibility they may have for conditions, the deranged (when he's normal, he can be ok) host stops nodding his head in agreement at that moment, and takes the first chance to say "Is it possible we can link these hospital conditions to Trump's tweets about the media?" Well, of course the real conversation about real life ended in that moment. They all were forced into the "blame Trump" mental gymnastics game that is currently at DEFCON level retarded.

On Fareed (yes I watch Fareed) a liberal doctor was attacked by a journalist for the NY Times (who had 100% obviously made his living in life being a total phony hyper-liberal fruitcake) for indicating that a balanced and statistical approach needed to be taken to figure out a proper response to this situation that did not result in a complete destruction of society. ALL HYPER-LIBERALS ARE NOW SUPPORTING COMPLETE SOCIETAL DESTRUCTION BECAUSE IT UNDERMINES TRUMP LOL.

Far leftists are often nihilists, as are many of your "Libertarian" righties. They aren't more "caring" in real life, but they are less. They are always just pretending, and having been very close with many, they are personally more callous and uncaring than most of the religious right I have personally known. The thing is though the only actually caring and intelligent stance is the one that uses data to find the balance. THAT is the humane position. Leftists position is literally about crashing things because of severe TDS. I see it.
 
So what do you call it when anything good happens is tied to Trump? Because anything good that happens is tied to Trump by Trump and his supporters, so when something bad happens, shouldn't it also be tied to Trump? Trump is the type of person that takes all the credit and accepts none of the blame.
 
So is sticking up for Trump no matter what and getting your panties in a bunch whenever someone criticizes him.
 
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,942
Messages
58,329,737
Members
176,000
Latest member
Markooz86

Share this page

Back
Top