- Joined
- Sep 9, 2007
- Messages
- 15,021
- Reaction score
- 2,639
Adding some context:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/sep/20/swine-flu-costs-un-report
H1N1 was expected to kill millions, using the same false logic. Current fatality rate X expected infections. Bad math.
You need to read that article. It was pure speculation about what MIGHT happen in poor nations: "Countries where health services are overburdened by diseases, such as HIV/Aids, tuberculosis and malaria, will have great difficulty managing the surge of cases."
It was not based on learning the lessons of Italy, which is now ACTUALLY (not speculatively) locked down and in crisis. And it had nothing to do with "bad math."
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-flu-pandemic-analysis-idUSTRE53T35Y20090430
Will it kill millions? Loaded ass question.
Again, it's like you didn't even read the article. This is all about how H1N1 did NOT seem severe, but might later turn out to be more deadly than it did at first. You seem to be suggesting that we should somehow spin that around in the optimistic thought that this virus, which has started out deadly, might later turn out to be mild. Based on what?
Similar rhetoric:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10945744/coronavirus-covid-19-kill-45-million-terrorism/
Coronavirus can kill 45million lmao.
https://www.newscientist.com/articl...-covid-19-coronavirus-outbreak-likely-to-get/
50 million claim
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/coro...uld-covid-19-really-kill-millions/ar-BB10GoFt
Suggesting millions
Well exactly.