• We are requiring that all users add Two-Step Verification (2FA) to their accounts, as found here: https://forums.sherdog.com/account/security Within one week, we will automatically set this up, so please make the necessary arrangements. Reach out to an admin if you encounter issues, and we apologize for any inconvenience.

News Conor McGregor found civilly liable for 2018 sexual assault

I mean you really have to be a special cunt to post this really don't you
Gotta be honest, I was thinking about how this could have been interpreted and went against my better judgement.

Dee should have thrown Conor's shit out the window ages ago. If not then, probably never will.

Here's hoping.
 
Wait, wtf that's Dee? She was a natural looking stunner back in the day.

92382269-14114607-image-a-33_1732295070704.jpg


It's like this was the only way conor could be like khabib and change someone's face.
 
@Kowboy On Sherdog I am disappointed in you bro WHY you shilling so much for Conor.. BBC, sky Sports and everyone else is writting it like it is... SAYING HE WAS found quilty. The fact that you even changed the title is a bit disappointing.

I don´t see why bother going into this much defensive for someone found quilty in a civil court
This has nothing to do with Conor. You needed to be learned ... and I learned you.

yoda-watch-and-learn.gif
 
The saddest part about this for the UFC community is that an army of morons decided to hate on Khabib and his crew because he beat the shit out of a rapist. Go figure.
 
@Kowboy On Sherdog I am disappointed in you bro WHY you shilling so much for Conor.. BBC, sky Sports and everyone else is writting it like it is... SAYING HE WAS found quilty. The fact that you even changed the title is a bit disappointing.

I don´t see why bother going into this much defensive for someone found quilty in a civil court
Not speaking for Kowboy, but for Sherdog. And not really Sherdog, but any company with financial exposure. Companies and websites have to watch their words or get sued.

Dig it, Conor just got sued and lost. That's literally what's going on here so we don't need Sherdog to get sued into bolivian.
 
This. I feel for victims of abuse and rape but nowadays too many people want an easy buck. I’d also like to read more about the evidence. Not saying she’s one of them but why did the criminal case didn’t go through? If you are a 5 figure bum no one is going after your ass but Coner is a perfect target for this kind of situations. Does he strike me as the type of guy that will forcibly make his way in? fuck yes… lol. But still.
I dislike Conor but this case seems strange. Apparently his pal slept with her after Conor raped her and this was accepted as consensual?

Apologies if I’m missing key information here I haven’t read too much into it
 
This has nothing to do with Conor. You needed to be learned ... and I learned you.

yoda-watch-and-learn.gif

I didn´t learn anything by you highlighting some formalities.

Trying to minimize the scale of this civil court case even changing the title of the thread lol but that is what I learned here.

BBC, Sky Sports and all the other major news outlets are calling for what it is.

Some wrote simple: ´´McGregor was found to have raped the victim´´
 
'civil rape', now there's a contradiction in terms.

conor's like trump, you have to just hope he eventually goes to jail.
Ohhhh, you didn’t notice that the feds have decided to dismiss the felony case against Trump? You guys are in for a very rude awakening for the foreseeable future…. And you guys deserve every bit of it for being so gullible.
 
I didn´t learn anything by you highlighting some formalities.

Trying to minimize the scale of this civil court case even changing the title of the thread lol.

BBC, Sky Sports and all the other major news outlets are calling for what it is.

Some wrote simple: ´´McGregor was found to have raped the victim´´


 

The money is a drop in the ocean to him but hopefully the damage to his reputation is irreparable and hopefully the Irish garda pick it up as a criminal case again.


This is why I would always counsel a woman who's raped by a much more powerful person to sue civilly and not criminally. Criminal lawsuits have a much higher burden of proof and IF he is found guilty (as a more powerful person with connections he probably won't) then his punishment might end up being some concoction that sees him do essentially zero jail time.

Meanwhile, she will have aged 10 years being grilled by defense attorneys, being slandered, under the microscope, and everything else, and she leaves with nothing other than the knowledge he has to do community service or whatever his light sentence is.

At least in a civil case, if she wins, having a lower burden of proof, she leaves with SOMETHING. If it was my daughter I would always keep her away from a criminal trial, where she stands nothing to gain, and direct her to a civil case, where she can get something for her troubles and where she has a higher chance of a guilty verdict.

Of course, we're not talking a home invader who beats and rapes random ppl, but a powerful, public figure who has "options" and isn't going to have a trial that is equally fair to both parties. If some violent crim breaks in and he's not connected and protected (as random guys who break in and rape usually aren't) then I see the cause for a criminal trial.

But a guy like Conor? Hit him in the pocketbook and the headlines. Make your one shot count.

No, I'm not liberal. Not by a longshot. This isn't because I believe all accusers. The details in the Hegseth case, for example, are hilarious. Obviously, that woman wasn't raped (if you read the police report it's almost hilarious). So I don't "believe all women" or any silly shit like that. I'm saying if my daughter WAS raped (I would 101% believe my daughter because I know her character), and the guy was rich or connected, I'd say to sue him civilly and not criminally.
 
I dislike Conor but this case seems strange. Apparently his pal slept with her after Conor raped her and this was accepted as consensual?

Apologies if I’m missing key information here I haven’t read too much into it

It seems the belief is that Conor asked his friend to say he slept with her to muddy the waters of the case.
 
Dee prob throwing all his shit out the window about now.
Dee could only really care about reputational loss and ONLY if Conor permits it. Dee has never shown any ability to do anything Conor doesn't want her to do and that may not be a bad thing for their family.

If she was independent and strong she'd leave him for some other self-indulgent asshole who also wouldn't respect her (women like her don't attract or value men who respect and value them as full human beings) and would have less money and they'd all have to deal with Conor's drama for their entire lives. I don't think it would be a better life for the kids.

If you marry a rich, powerful, narcissistic brute and have kids with him, the best thing for your kids in many cases will be to shut up and play your role, at least until they are adults.
 
It seems the belief is that Conor asked his friend to say he slept with her to muddy the waters of the case.
Ah, she denies that part? I haven't followed this closely.

And what about the video of her hugging him and kissing him after? Is it still that she claims she was blacked out and not knowing or weighing what she was doing? Which is indeed possible but not common....
 
He's appealing. I guess Chandler will have to wait another year

Of COURSE he's appealing. I know (from a distance) a couple of narcissists and THEY ARE NEVER DONE UNTIL THEY THINK THEY'VE WON.

NEVER.
 
Back
Top