• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

News *** Conor McGregor Found Civilly Liable for 2018 Sexual Assault MEGA THREAD ***

That is not what you are doing
Because you and your cuck buddies do not read. It's stated multiple times, that while my opinion of Mcgregor and the victim per civil court isn't high. My opinion is worthless and this warrants a criminal trial.
 
Once again I will state it. So you don't forget. You're an emotional weakling trying to base arguments on shaming.

I specifically stated my opinion was worthless as it's just that. An opinion. What's needed is criminal court and more scrutiny of evidence. Which could go both ways. Which is fine by me. You would probably be seething if he managed to dodge criminal court. I just want the truth. This also includes the possibility of me being wrong.

You can state everything you want, you can twist words, throw out emotional attacks it doesn't matter. Like I said I'd absolutely dogwalk you in terms of raw intelligence.

But keep being emotionally invested, shame everyone for wrong think. You got all the information, right? Not once has someone gone into what I said. It's attack of character and emoticon spams, lol. They will call you a rape apologist but will never go into a balanced discussion. Your number one response is emotionally loaded attacks.
It's funny that you keep pretending to be a rational person. It's not convincing.
 
Because you and your cuck buddies do not read.
Ironic, since a bunch of stuff you have said has been repeatedly debunked in this thread.

Many of the questions you ask have been answered. You just haven't bothered to learn anything and instead you are trying to pretend you are being logical and not a shameless rape apologist.

Which you obviously are.
 
Once again I will state it. So you don't forget. You're an emotional weakling trying to base arguments on shaming.

I specifically stated my opinion was worthless as it's just that. An opinion. What's needed is criminal court and more scrutiny of evidence. Which could go both ways. Which is fine by me. You would probably be seething if he managed to dodge criminal court. I just want the truth. This also includes the possibility of me being wrong.

You can state everything you want, you can twist words, throw out emotional attacks it doesn't matter. Like I said I'd absolutely dogwalk you in terms of raw intelligence.

But keep being emotionally invested, shame everyone for wrong think. You got all the information, right? Not once has someone gone into what I said. It's attack of character and emoticon spams, lol. They will call you a rape apologist but will never go into a balanced discussion. Your number one response is emotionally loaded attacks.

rustleometer-1-670cd1963d.gif
 
Well you haven't been doing a very good job of that so far.

I am not shaming you for having an opinion. I am shaming you for being stupid and rude and passionately defending a rapist.

I'm always sus of men who do this. Like, they seem hell-bent on proving the rapist's innocence... rather than just dealing with the facts, and, let's be honest - the fact that in most cases, the guy fkn raped her lol. Bc false accusations, especially criminal accusations to strangers are... beyond rare.

People defend their own.

Seriously suss of that guy's morals and who he is.

He's dying to defend this rapist.

Dirty cunt.
 
I have been his harshest critic, but what's the cancel culture trying to virtue signal

Most of these fuckwits are likely guilty of much themselves

No matter our personal beliefs, the guy was found liable, not guilty

As daming as the medical report was, why is there CCTV footage after showing her in good spirits?

No amount of coke could block out such a vicious assault

I'm going to read more into this. I still belief conor is a bad guy, but did HE 100% rape her?

I found that odd myself but seeing a few people talk about the case that were there it seems that it's common in those kind of cases where they don't run screaming right after and kind of accept it until things settle down. Def still behaviour to suit Conor's argument over hers but i don't feel it was the slam dunk of as argument i felt when i first read it.

What it came down to what the Jury was there, they saw her embracing him but they also saw the bruising / damages / tampon.. reports from the Drs and saw Conor's DNA in her.. i think him nutting in her is more evidence than her dancing when it's was explained that's common after a R as a cope / safety mechanism.
 
I found that odd myself but seeing a few people talk about the case that were there it seems that it's common in those kind of cases where they don't run screaming right after and kind of accept it until things settle down. Def still behaviour to suit Conor's argument over hers but i don't feel it was the slam dunk of as argument i felt when i first read it.

What it came down to what the Jury was there, they saw her embracing him but they also saw the bruising / damages / tampon.. reports from the Drs and saw Conor's DNA in her.. i think him nutting in her is more evidence than her dancing when it's was explained that's common after a R as a cope / safety mechanism.

Yes fair points mate, I just hate virtue signalling cunts, but it doesn't look good for Conor

It's terrible that he is walking around if guilty
 
Like I said I'd absolutely dogwalk you in any form of intelligent contest. This is my 3rd language. Once again I will state it. Shaming people for having an opinion is weakling behaviour.
Isn't that what you are doing?

Just walk away, Conor is guilty that's not changing. They may go after him for more, but for now he's done and your opinion here won't help him. Nor does he care (until you buy something off him)
 
The evidence is that they had sex, only his DNA was on her. And there are conflicting reports, Danielle said she didn't hear anything strange.

What plausible alternative explanation is there, that anyone has given?
Somebody else could have inflicted them. Her boyfriend or James Lawrence for example.
 
Isn't that what you are doing?

Just walk away, Conor is guilty that's not changing. They may go after him for more, but for now he's done and your opinion here won't help him. Nor does he care (until you buy something off him)
He's not guilty. He's innocent. He's civilly liable.
 
Somebody else could have inflicted them. Her boyfriend or James Lawrence for example.

You are acting like a nimrod and need to stop.

No, it couldn't have been her boyfriend. She sent the photos of her injuries before going home to her friend, and messaged her before returning home. The friend testified and time stamped messages was evidence presented on trial, and it checked.

Also, her boyfriend's DNA was not on her. So, he would have battered her up and then raped her with a condom on? And afterwards Nikita went "guess I can spin a rape case!"

And nobody, not one person, is claiming James Lawrence did this. Not Conor's team, not Nikita, not anyone. I guess Tom Hanks could have done it, right?
 
I'm always sus of men who do this. Like, they seem hell-bent on proving the rapist's innocence... rather than just dealing with the facts, and, let's be honest - the fact that in most cases, the guy fkn raped her lol. Bc false accusations, especially criminal accusations to strangers are... beyond rare.

People defend their own.

Seriously suss of that guy's morals and who he is.

He's dying to defend this rapist.

Dirty cunt.
It's funny to go "you're using shame as your argument" when the argument was already made, and then that person comes in to say some really shameful shit about it.

It's like, "No guy, it's not part of the argument. You should just be ashamed of yourself."
 
You think you're smart but you would absolutely get dogwalked by me in a contest of logic.


Did you read the rest of the post too. Or do you want to take the slimy way out and twist words? What girl is chill, keeps drinking, hooks up with his friend and goes back to the hotel afterwards with a tampon lodged in her Cervix? The point I'm making is. If that is her in the videos and the tampon was lodged into her Cervix it would mean she's severely under influence. Or the injuries weren't as prevalent before.

Everybody is retarded in this story. You White Knights keep speaking about this and that. But I know real criminals, been in real situations where you see the true nature of females unhinged.

I've seen em cheat, drugged out of their mind, gangbanged, suck dick for cocaine, lie, steal, fight, I've seen them degrade their boyfriends, I've seen em fake cry in hotels speaking to their bf's parents while getting fucked. I've seen em lie and get people fired, fuck their way up into positions, throw everything away for a night with a celebrity. All the while they make the normal guy wait while they cry and spin up narratives. They aren't the angels you think they are. And none of these people were even 1/10th of the celebrity or had the kind of notoriety Conor had.

These females will lie, cheat, gaslight their way into believing shit themselves. Don't forget that before you cry about rape. The point I'm trying to make is: If you got brutally raped, why would you go back to the hotel you got raped at when the dude who did it leaves after you kiss him goodbye?

This is the truth:

Conor is a grade A retard that threw away his legacy to hang with criminals and degenerates.
This chick threw away her relationship to chill at a hotel with criminals, mma fighters, celebrities and high rollers.
They both took a copious amount of drugs. And this chick got passed around like thrash. Im not saying he didn't rape her. But this girl put herself in the situation and made every wrong move up until chilling with them on camera and continuing to keep drinking.

Did he rape her? I don't know. The evidence stinks both ways. You guys are tactfully ignoring evidence like this is an emotional game to win. Quit acting like a vindicated homosexual and at least take the whole message into account before you guys try to shame.

I might be old fashioned, but if a female teases, plays a game, fucks around, kisses, feels you up, goes to a hotel room, gets fucked and later claims she was too drunk to remember most of it. Kisses your friend after the rape and goes back to the hotel. It means she didn't get raped in most cases but choose to pick plausible deniability. If you don't have experience with this behaviour do not speak about it, lol. Once again Conor could've raped her. There are no cams, there is no footage. It's a toss up.

Yes, you have some anecdotal experience about an ex being raped. As you are an expert. Enlighten me, what is Anecdotal experience worth?

My explanation is that the evidence of her cozying up with him, continuing to party. Hook up with his friend. Go back to the hotel instead of safely to her husbands bed is a clear indicator of her being heavily under influence and actively seeking to prolong the experience. Which is weird and warrants questions.

Here is the point where you cucks start shaming and screaming. Let me again for the 5th time state that Conor is a loser, degenerate guy that lost most of his legacy due to trying to hang with criminals, abuse drugs and what not. If he raped her. As in brutally forced her and fucked her tampon inside her Cervix with the Victim in this case pleading for him to stop and not do it. He raped her.

My personal opinion, which is worth nothing and thus haven't stated it apart from giving options is:

Both her and Conor are druggy degenerates. Went on benders, she decided to cheat on her husband because Conor graced her with his presence. This means she flirted with him and cozied up with him. She was on her period, but that didn't stop her from getting closer to him. They got in the bedroom and she stated that she was on her period. Conor didn't give a fuck, she didn't like it but let him. Both fucked up from copious amounts of coke, alcohol and w/e just started fucking. She felt insecure and weird about it all. But fuck it, it's Mcgregor. Can't let this one pass up. She had some pain and discomfort but was obviously drugged. So she cozied up. Mcgregor got bored and went somewhere else to either do drugs, fuck someone else or both. While she was left there. Conors mate had some charm so she cozied up with him. Dude tried to get a nut and started talking her up. Thus she decided to return to the hotel to hook up with this dude.

When all was said and done, she returned home. Her boyfriend got wind of him being fucked over by her. And started a mess, rumors spread like a hot fire via whatsapp groups and dude was humiliated. Maybe he beat her, maybe he didn't wouldn't be the first cheater battered ever. She decided to tell him she didn't want it. Didn't want to be there, didn't want it all. Had sharp pains in the morning when the drugs and alcohol wore off and she headed to the hospital. To save face for her family, her inlaws and her children she convinced herself she was brutally raped.

This is just applying Occams Razor. Remember there are loads of false rape allegations. I'd like to see this go to criminal trial.

Once again. My opinion is worthless as it's anecdotal. I'd say bring it to criminal court and if they truly prove without reasonable doubt that he raped her, punish him.

Trusting a girl on a multiple day bender with holes in her story, a man at home with her kids and willingly going to a place where criminals, fighters and high rollers reside is mostly done by girls for certain reasons. And not because they value their chastity.

You know, you have an extremely odd way of addressing people, saying they speak like "vindicated homosexuals", saying that you've "seen the true nature of women unhinged" and the questioning then value of anecdotal evidence, talk about "lefty shaming" and lots of other strange reactions. The irony is this shows your true colors: a malcontent misogynist and homophone who is also a hypocrite, extrapolating from his own experiences to discredit the testimony of the victim, who incidentally had the jury rule in her favor.

You are making up stories as you go along:

"Her boyfriend got wind of him being fucked over by her. And started a mess, rumors spread like a hot fire via whatsapp groups and dude was humiliated. Maybe he beat her, maybe he didn't wouldn't be the first cheater battered ever. She decided to tell him she didn't want it. Didn't want to be there, didn't want it all. Had sharp pains in the morning when the drugs and alcohol wore off and she headed to the hospital. To save face for her family, her inlaws and her children she convinced herself she was brutally raped."

This is all of your own imagination, not just speculative, but ungrounded in anything we actually know. Nobody claimed this was what happened. Not Nikita Hand, not Conor's team, nobody. There's not a shred of evidence that any of this is true. In fact, we have very good reasons to think this is not true.

Why?

Because as I mentioned repeatedly, Nikita Hand sent photographs of her injuries and messages speaking to her state prior to going back home to a friend who testified, and who presented the messages and gave testimony. These were time stamped and verified in court, and Conor's legal team did not touch this. And his BF's DNA was not on her. He battered her up and then raped her using a condom? That hypothesis just didn't add up, and Conor's legal team knew this, or else they would have suggested it. They didn't even call medical experts to offer the possibility that the injuries she sustained were consensual, because everyone who was in court and saw the injuries, including experts, reporters, professionals, the jury, and Conor McGregor agreed that these were shockingly bad, and beyond the threshold of possibility of the result of "consensual but rough sex", which Conor denied.


The pending question is: how come she didn't seem badly injured in the CCTV footage and was seen going back and forth into the hotel?

When doctors were interrogated by Hand's team they said bruising and swelling from injuries take time to show, and under the influence of alcohol and drugs pain is largely mitigated. Everyone who has ever been injured knows this: say, if you fall and bust your knee, get back up and walk with some pain, morning after it's swollen and bruised and can't walk. There were bruises over her entire body that showed signs of extensive damage. Yes, she was seen in the parking lot after extremely drunk, going back and forth and in the hotel. She was on a three day bender.

You can choose to believe she wasn't injured at this point, and she sustained the injuries afterwards. But you would need a plausible story, and the boyfriend doing it doesn't check out. And the alternative that these were bruises sustained consensually in sex has been ruled out by every single party involved, including Conor McGregor.

There simply no alternative explanation that anyone has offered that makes better sense. Which is why, you know, Conor lost the trial, and nobody who attended the proceedings other than Conor's team and relatives thinks the ruling was a bad one on the basis of what they saw. Which includes, you know, the evidence in question.
 
Last edited:
You know, you have an extremely odd way of addressing people, saying they speak like "vindicated homosexuals", saying that you've "seen the true nature of women unhinged" and the questioning then value of anecdotal evidence, talk about "lefty shaming" and lots of other strange reactions. The irony is this shows your true colors: a malcontent misogynist and homophone who is also a hypocrite, extrapolating from his own experiences to discredit the testimony of the victim, who incidentally had the jury rule in her favor.

You are making up stories as you go along:

"Her boyfriend got wind of him being fucked over by her. And started a mess, rumors spread like a hot fire via whatsapp groups and dude was humiliated. Maybe he beat her, maybe he didn't wouldn't be the first cheater battered ever. She decided to tell him she didn't want it. Didn't want to be there, didn't want it all. Had sharp pains in the morning when the drugs and alcohol wore off and she headed to the hospital. To save face for her family, her inlaws and her children she convinced herself she was brutally raped."

This is all of your own imagination, not just speculative, but ungrounded in anything we actually know. Nobody claimed this was what happened. Not Nikita Hand, not Conor's team, nobody. There's not a shred of evidence that any of this is true. In fact, we have very good reasons to think this is not true.

Why?

Because as I mentioned repeatedly, Nikita Hand sent photographs of her injuries and messages speaking to her state prior to going back home to a friend who testified, and who presented the messages and gave testimony. These were time stamped and verified in court, and Conor's legal team did not touch this. And his BF's DNA was not on her. He battered her up and then raped her using a condom? That hypothesis just didn't add up, and Conor's legal team knew this, or else they would have suggested it. They didn't even call medical experts to offer the possibility that the injuries she sustained were consensual, because everyone who was in court and saw the injuries, including experts, reporters, professionals, the jury, and Conor McGregor agreed that these were shockingly bad, and beyond the threshold of possibility of the result of "consensual but rough sex", which Conor denied.


The pending question is: how come she didn't seem badly injured in the CCTV footage and was seen going back and forth into the hotel?

When doctors were interrogated by Hand's team they said bruising and swelling from injuries take time to show, and under the influence of alcohol and drugs pain is largely mitigated. Everyone who has ever been injured knows this: say, if you fall and bust your knee, get back up and walk with some pain, morning after it's swollen and bruised. There were bruises over her entire body, extensive, that showed signs of extensive damage. Yes, she was seen in the parking lot after extremely drunk, going back and forth and in the hotel. She was on a three day bender.

You can choose to believe she wasn't injured at this point, and she sustained the injuries afterwards. But you would need a plausible story, and the boyfriend doing it doesn't check out. And the alternative that these were bruises sustained consensually in sex has been ruled out by every single party involved, including Conor McGregor.

There simply no alternative explanation that that anyone has offered that makes better sense. Which is why, you know, Conor lost the trial, and nobody who attended the proceedings other than Conor's team and relatives thinks the ruling was a bad one on the basis of what they saw. Which includes, you know, the evidence in question.
Thank you for this, and for all of your other work in this thread. You have consistently been the voice of reason and antidote to the bullshit false narratives.
 
Looks like he still hasn't gotten the memo on IG

Screenshot-2024-12-01-235019.png


You know his hands will be shaking in rage when he has to change this

"the face of the rape game"

"Mr. McDiddy"
 
Last edited:
Thank you for this, and for all of your other work in this thread. You have consistently been the voice of reason and antidote to the bullshit false narratives.
while im of the opinion of conrat absolutely did rape her, objectively we also cannot deny up to this point there is no criminal conviction (yes, civil court ruling and history is enough for me to call him a rapist). and there's also some evidence and testimony that can call Nikita's version of the story into question, not strong evidence mind you, and i can easily believe that the irish prick did have certain arrangements with the witnesses or whatever, just that the arrangements are not investigated nor proven at this point. so every other chucklefucks that are biased against nikita or simply diehard conrat nuthuggers can still cope by saying there's a miniscule (my opinion) chance that he in fact didn't rape her.

for the record, i very much doubt the version @Snoowpy pedaling is what happened, but i can appreciate his delivery of his opinion.
 
Conor Mcgregor fronted the lawyer fees for his co-defendant James Lawrence, who was found innocent, this means Nikita may have to cover attorney fees that will be higher than the $250,000 Mcgregor owes from the judgment.


Khabib is pushing an anti Mcgregor Cryto coin to raise money for Nikita for accusing Lawrence who was innocent and may be responsible for paying Mcgregor for Lawrence’s fees.



 
Back
Top