What the fuck is wrong with you guys? You know nothing about any of these people but a tiny little bits of there lives.
I think a lot of you people are the same ones that would have stoned jesus to death by the way you talk and your behavior.
But no one argued that happened, and was pretty proven not to have happened. Do you know the details?Because it's strange for someone who was raped to then go and f#%$ the rapist's friend that same night. Plus there is CCT footage of her all over them, etc.
I just looked it up and England and Ireland do not recognise common law marriage.She was better off just being silent...
Enjoy the millions from Conor, does Ireland recognizes living together as "common law marriage"?? Something like that (my country does afaik), they have kids but child support isnt the same as getting money from him.
This is not accurateBecause a legal case has to show a violation of the law, a civil one (in this case decided by a jury of 8 women and 4 men) is based on if someone should be rewarded a settlement for damages.
Also not accurateHe was not charged because evidence contradicted her claims of an assault.
Also not accurateBut in the civil case she claimed she didn't remember her slack behavior and turned on the water works.
That, and the mountain of evidence.That combined with Conor's notorious reputation was enough to convince the jury she should get paid.
I just looked it up and England and Ireland do not recognise common law marriage.
They aren't called common-law married. Apparently the term is cohabiting couples and there are certain legal protections, especially if one partner is much wealthier than the other.
Redress scheme for cohabiting couples
What is the redress scheme for cohabitants and who qualifies?www.citizensinformation.ie
Obviously she would be wealthiest if she stays with him, but if she left she would still be fine and wouldn't have to, you know, get a real job.
Ah yes, her genius plan to get paid by denying a big settlement payout.Because a legal case has to show a violation of the law, a civil one (in this case decided by a jury of 8 women and 4 men) is based on if someone should be rewarded a settlement for damages.
He was not charged because evidence contradicted her claims of an assault. But in the civil case she claimed she didn't remember her slack behavior and turned on the water works. That combined with Conor's notorious reputation was enough to convince the jury she should get paid.
Agree, looks like she has a lot of blame in this. Conor is lucky to have his woman back him. Dee DevlinBecause a legal case has to show a violation of the law, a civil one (in this case decided by a jury of 8 women and 4 men) is based on if someone should be rewarded a settlement for damages.
He was not charged because evidence contradicted her claims of an assault. But in the civil case she claimed she didn't remember her slack behavior and turned on the water works. That combined with Conor's notorious reputation was enough to convince the jury she should get paid.
Devlin didn't stop at defending McGregor, instead directing her anger at Hand’s behavior. She accused Hand of lying about her actions, including a "3-day bender" and texting excuses to her child while out partying. “Texting excuses to her own child at home where mammy is on Saturday afternoon, Saturday night, Sunday morning, Sunday afternoon, Sunday night into Monday morning,” Devlin wrote, further highlighting Hand’s alleged irresponsible actions.
Devlin went on to call out Hand for her alleged behavior in a hotel room, claiming that Hand was “dancing around a hotel car park” and out of control. “What sort of WOMAN are you!!!” Devlin exclaimed in her post. “My sons will be warned women like you exist in the world.”
Ah yes, her genius plan to get paid by denying a big settlement payout.
I'm not comparing them to Jesus at all sir.Jesus wasn't a rapist or a piece of shit like Dee, so I'm sure he's safe
I also find it hilarious how you compare these 2 tramps to the Son Of God, who at the very Least was a very nice man to atheists, but God to many including me
A portion of the public (including myself) didn't think he did it.
Cliffs:
-Washington said that she resisted Tyson's advances in the limo, three witnesses claimed she was the one who started kissing him, but the judge didn't allow those witnesses to testify. It also begged the question, if she was resisting his advances, why did she exit the limo, walk through the hotel lobby, and follow Tyson up to his hotel room? But because Tyson's lawyer only got hired because he had previously got Don King out of a tax lawsuit and didn't have any experience in these types of cases, the lawyer never properly cross examined Washington.
-Washington had gone into Tyson's hotel bathroom to remove her pantyliner and didn't replace it with anything; if she were resisting his advances, why did she do that? Furthermore, in those types of hotel rooms there are telephones, so if she thought she was about to be raped, why didn't she call the downstairs for help? Again, Tyson's lawyer didn't have any experience with these cases and never asked these questions.
-Washington was presented throughout the case as a good, virgin, Christian woman, but an ex-boyfriend signed an affidavit that when Washington's father found out they had (consensual) premarital sëx, she told her father that her boyfriend raped her, but the judge once again didn't allow this sworn statement to be entered into evidence.
-The jurors for the case said later that they would've given a different verdict had they known any of this, but because of incompetent lawyering and a corrupt/racist judge, Tyson was "convicted".
This piece of evidence alone would be enough to create reasonable doubt, not to mention the multitudes of other evidence and cross examination that could've saved Tyson had it not been for the racist judge and Tyson's incompetent lawyer.
What the fuck is wrong with you guys? You know nothing about any of these people but a tiny little bits of there lives.
I think a lot of you people are the same ones that would have stoned jesus to death by the way you talk and your behavior.
Watch Candace Owen's video on this case. She breaks it down very well and talks just facts not bias opinions like you pharisee's
But no one argued that happened, and was pretty proven not to have happened. Do you know the details?
This is not accurate
Also not accurate
Also not accurate
That, and the mountain of evidence.
Nikita Hand was badly injured by someone. But by who?
Civil laws govern disputes between private parties. A civil case is one in which an individual or entity (such as a corporation) uses the court system to pursue a legal remedy. Common types of civil cases include:
Criminal law relates to wrongs committed against the public. If a state or federal government prohibits a certain type of behavior and the laws prohibiting that misconduct are violated, an agent of the state (such as a prosecutor or a district attorney) will take legal action against the violator.
- Personal injury claims
- Contract disputes
- Family law cases such as divorce
Many different kinds of wrongdoing could result in criminal charges including but not limited to:
- Drug crimes
- Impaired driving
- Sexual offenses
- Assault and battery
- Weapons-related offenses
- Fraud
- Larceny
- Burglary
Doesn't sound that way to me:I get what you’re saying. But I don’t think they’re married and they may have an open relationship.
If anything, she seems to be his best friend.
I think she's trying to say her and Conor dealt with their relationship issues, in reference to the infidelity. But he has continued to fuck around since then, so I guess him 'apologizing' and cheating on his fiancee was "settled" by him being allowed to cheat despite feeling the need to apologize for itWait
Dee wrote " “We have dealt with these issues privately many years ago as should be done in a relationship and we have come out stronger than ever,”
So they dealt with this privately? So she is pretty much admitting they tried to settle?