• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

News *** Conor McGregor Found Civilly Liable for 2018 Sexual Assault MEGA THREAD ***


i remember back when it was first reported.
A lot of people was baffled over the police.
Because already back then it was clear that there were evidence.

How often do you got DNA in rape cases?
The injuries, the EMT the doctor and so on.
I would claim there is a lot of evidence here that points to rape. At least enough for a criminal trial.
 
Conor might still have a future making money punching mascots at basketball games, especially with teams who are suffering from low attendance numbers. It's probably all he'll have left combat-related after BKFC cancels him.

conor-4-4eaa3a5619.gif
 
Yep I just read that.
And Hitman took him out of their new game.

Actions have consequences.

Now if only the American public gave a fuck about SA we'd have a different upcoming president. Republicans were going to release the Epstein list until they discovered Mr Trump had been there more times than Conor has done lines of coke. Now they are trying to act like Epstein Island never existed.

Rough election huh?
 
Conor might still have a future making money punching mascots at basketball games, especially with teams who are suffering from low attendance numbers. It's probably all he'll have left combat-related after BKFC cancels him.

View attachment 1073537
oh come on, theres no way he hit the mascot that hard. the mascot was obviously drunk and probably bruised himself after to incriminate connor. no way my boy connor would do something that wreckless and sociopathic.
 
When did they do that?
Are there any updates?
Because I think there is a possibility it gets reopened based on the evidence.

“In January 2021, after prosecutors declined to prosecute McGregor for the 2018 alleged sexual assault, a civil claim for damages was launched in the High Court.”
 
707e0c6b281a405f8cfbf8a3dddc89d3_xl.jpg

😄😁
That is Alan Belcher's Johnny Cash level bad tattoo
1732717553154.png
 
Obviously an alt account. Why don't you use your main account?

Why would he need an alt account lol

Do you think posting anything on your main account makes you "tough"? Touch some grass, buddy, lol

He is right about civil court being too lenient on the burden of proof, and 2/3 of the juri being women. People hate McGrefor so much (rightfully so) that they will never give him a fair shake over a very serious matter.

He could easily be a rapist, but he would have never been found guilty in a criminal case because the evidence isnt there.

That you can even have a rape trial in civil court is mind blowing.
 
First off, Mike Tyson DID lose sponsors. Have you ever heard of Mike Tyson's Punchout? Ever wonder why the other Punchouts do not have Mike Tyson's name or likeness in them despite the success of the NES game? Selling video games to kids with a rapist on the cover isn't good business.


Second, you're talking like it's a double standard yet you're citing something that happened 30 years ago in a different country.


Not sponsoring a rapist has nothing to do with cancel culture. Like, you realize they sponsor them because they are only famous in the first place, not because of some positive ethics. The entire point of a sponsor is for image.
I hate to nitpick but contrary to what most people think (I also thought this for a long time) they didn't change Punch Out due to any controversy, but because the contract with him had expired and Nintendo didn't want to pay him anymore. In fact the rebranding of Punch Out happened in 90 which was before the incident with Desiree.

As far as Tyson or anyone else goes, I think a lot of people are talking past each other here. I think, or rather hope, that there's nobody here that would want Tyson or McGregor to NOT go to prison if they in fact did assault these women. I think the true conflict is in people disagreeing with whether or not he's guilty. I have to admit I was always biased towards Mike growing up, he was my hero. I would argue with people not on the premise that he shouldn't go to jail if guilty, but on the belief that he didn't do it.

It's not difficult to believe that Conor did this. He should do time, not pay a measly (for him) $250k. Someone mentioned the fact that if she was just extorting for money, Nikita would have settled out of court and gotten a ton more money. That's a huge point. I say he's guilty. Should do time.
 
May as well change the name altogether, but then it’s just a piss whiskey with no gimmick
It is pretty fucking bad isn't it lol, friend of mine was so fucking gullible to their marketing he actually thought it was good...I almost spit it out from just a sip and refused to drink anymore...he was bewildered.
 
Why would he need an alt account lol

Do you think posting anything on your main account makes you "tough"? Touch some grass, buddy, lol

He is right about civil court being too lenient on the burden of proof, and 2/3 of the juri being women. People hate McGrefor so much (rightfully so) that they will never give him a fair shake over a very serious matter.

He could easily be a rapist, but he would have never been found guilty in a criminal case because the evidence isnt there.

That you can even have a rape trial in civil court is mind blowing.

He's using alt account, I'm just asking why he's using it. Of course I don't think posting on your main account makes you tough.
 
You seem to know Ares quite well from the War Room. I suspect you're a WR regular who's being too much of a pussy to simp for Conor on your main account.
Fair assumption, but no. I just browse the ufc forum occasionally and see his predictable low testosterone posts on anything mildy political or related to gender. You can assume its an alt account if you want, I couldnt care less <lol>
 
Really? It's not possible to jam a tampon up there hard? Amazing!
So far it needed to be removed by a doctor with forceps? No, not plausible if you have any understanding of reality.
It's difficulty to prove beyond a reasonable doubt because the evidence is weak and her behaviour contradicts her statement <lol>and her quote about Conor angrily choking her whilst mentioning his loss to Khabib is so laughably contrived that anyone with a brain would know its what she thought up.
How the fuck would you know what kind of crazy bullshit McGregor said all coked up while raping a woman?

She was also very fucked up, and it's obviously not a direct quote. It's entirely possible he was ranting about his loss. He had just been emasculated and humiliated in the biggest fight of his career, in front of the entire world.
Civil cases require no evidence apart from an accusation sometimes,
Absolute nonsense. You are a clown.
which is why they're the preferred method of women looking for a payday. His 2/3 female jury didnt help.
You should change your screen name to RapeApologistScum
You are emotional, no need to deny it. You're the biggest leftist on the forum so you vehemently defending women wherever you can is expected, if not somewhat pathetic. Still, its entertaining.
I'm flattered you know my work. I also don't think you could accurately define Leftist if your life depended on it.
If you think her giving herself a quick injury to make her story look more credible is a "masterplan" then you're not very intelligent.
You are literally ignoring a mountain of evidence and testimony and expert opinion and going all in on a conspiracy theory requiring the victim to do an astonishing amount of work to convince so many people that she really was brutally assaulted.

Here are two options, and I want you to tell me which one you think is more likely:

1) Nikita Hand was a fucked up party girl who wanted to party with Conor McGregor and get free coke in exchange for blowjobs or whatever. She did not want to have sex, only because she was on her period.

Instead Conor McGregor had "rough sex" with her(which he has admitted) that caused her many injuries. She was on a bender and coked up, so she wasn't aware of how badly she was hurt until she started to sober up.

When she could understand what had happened to her she wanted justice for the violence she had suffered against her will.

Or

2) Nikita Hand is a cunning mastermind and a gifted actress who managed to trick paramedics and doctors into believing her story and horrifying then with the extent of her (self-inflicted?) injuries, and then lying to everyone in her life for years and tricking a psychiatrist into diagnosing her with PTSD and then spent years of her life pursuing a pay day against poor innocent Conor McGregor.

Despite the fact that she demanded criminal charges, not civil. Despite the fact that she almost certainly turned down out of court settlements unlike most of McGregor's other accusers.
Its about as advanced as punching myself in the eye and accusing someone of assaulting me. Certainly nothing damning
You really have no idea what you are talking about and you have thoroughly embarrassed yourself here today.
 
Add being the first UFC fighter to inspire an anti-rape march about him to Conor's list of achievements.

Imagine how worse it would get for him if Irish WMMA fighters like Sinead Kavanaugh or Leah McCourt started speaking out against him and disavowing him, or that female boxer he always hypes up. His name would be mud in every MMA circle at that point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lsa
Back
Top