• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

News *** Conor McGregor Found Civilly Liable for 2018 Sexual Assault MEGA THREAD ***

She jammed a tampon with Conor's DNA on it so far up herself it needed to be removed with forceps?

Are you sure?

Also she was almost certainly offered an out of court settlement to make this go away and she went the legal route before the civil route, so it's pretty clearly not about the money for her.
You don't think whilst being absolutely cooked on drugs she couldn't have done that? Its a completely self inflictable injury.


You clearly aren't aware of the extent of her injuries. It is not reasonable to think they are self-inflicted. It's an absurd suggestion.

No, it isn't. She was traumatized and shit faced.

She gets no money from a criminal case. It wasn't thrown out because there was no evidence, it wasn't pursued because there wasn't a reasonable chance of conviction. The burden of proof is much higher.

There is more than enough evidence to show Conor McGregor is very obviously the person most likely to have caused Nikita Hand's injury.

That is not getting into fights. That is a history of assaulting people.

You are a deeply ridiculous person.

No, it's been done a thousand times because there are a lot of assholes who don't bother to learn anything about the case.


All you have done in this thread is embarrass yourself and bring shame to your family.
Actually its not an absurd suggestion. Which is why as you just admitted it wasn't compelling enough evidence to have a reasonable chance of convicting Conor. You saying there's more than enough evidence is ironic when there obviously wasn't enough evidence <lol>

You sound emotional. I understand you're probably still rattled from Trump winning, but try to cry when you're in the shower, instead of on here. ;)
 
You don't think whilst being absolutely cooked on drugs she couldn't have done that? Its a completely self inflictable injury.
No, it isn't. And that was by no means her only injury.
Actually its not an absurd suggestion. Which is why as you just admitted it wasn't compelling enough evidence to have a reasonable chance of convicting Conor.
It is very difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. It is not very difficult to figure out what likely happened.
You saying there's more than enough evidence is ironic when there obviously wasn't enough evidence <lol>
More than enough evidence for a civil case. Debatably enough evidence for a criminal one.
You sound emotional. I understand you're probably still rattled from Trump winning, but try to cry when you're in the shower, instead of on here. ;)
I'm not emotional. I just don't like scumbag rape apologists. Or morons.
 
10 years later we will see Khabib in HotMMAin' with McGregor
 
even after this shit there were still stories about Conor, the fat chick at the ball game, the shit in Spain, the videos of him clearly high as fuck on cocaine, he hasn't change, maybe this will help him.

Don't forget he punched the Miami Heat mascot.

skynews-conor-mcgregor-miami-heat_6185180.jpg
 
Last edited:
I mean to have had them up means you weren't really concerned about his moral character at all anyway as he's not hidden who he is. This is pure virtue signalling.
 
Did Conor really never expect any repercussions over his behaviour?

He can't possibly be that fucking stupid.
I honestly think his mindset is coke-fueled invincibility most of the time.

He can afford to bury any hint of fear or insecurity or shame or guilt under a mountain of confidence.
 
You don't think whilst being absolutely cooked on drugs she couldn't have done that? Its a completely self inflictable injury.



Actually its not an absurd suggestion. Which is why as you just admitted it wasn't compelling enough evidence to have a reasonable chance of convicting Conor. You saying there's more than enough evidence is ironic when there obviously wasn't enough evidence <lol>

You sound emotional. I understand you're probably still rattled from Trump winning, but try to cry when you're in the shower, instead of on here. ;)

I think that going by occam's razor the chances of her stuffing a tampon up herself that far while being really high on drugs as part of a coked up masterplan to get money out of McGregor Vs a guy with a few sexual assault allegations raping her while she had her tampon in the latter is by far the most likely.
 
I'm not emotional. I just don't like scumbag rape apologists. Or morons.

Honestly, I've been on sherdog for like 15 years, and I haven't ever been as turned off from this site as I have been this past week in seeing all the people desperately defending Conor. If they truthfully and honestly looked at all the evidence in the case and said they don't think that's enough evidence to be convinced that conor did it, then I'd simply strongly disagree with them. But they aren't even at that level of reasoning -- they defend the guy with very limited information of the case. It's like they saw headlines from other biased Conor fanboys on twitter or youtube, and with that limited, biased info they confidently defend a guy who a jury found guilty of rape. I really wonder what woman figure hurt these guys in their lives to make them so predisposed to this kind of behavior.

It's disgusting.
 
Last edited:
I think that going by occam's razor the chances of her stuffing a tampon up herself that far while being really high on drugs as part of a coked up masterplan to get money out of McGregor Vs a guy with a few sexual assault allegations raping her while she had her tampon in the latter is by far the most likely.

also it took 6 years to get 250ish K / euro.
Thats really not a pay day at all.

A gold digger would have moved on long time ago,
 
No, it isn't. And that was by no means her only injury.

It is very difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. It is not very difficult to figure out what likely happened.

More than enough evidence for a civil case. Debatably enough evidence for a criminal one.

I'm not emotional. I just don't like scumbag rape apologists. Or morons.
Really? It's not possible to jam a tampon up there hard? Amazing.

It's difficulty to prove beyond a reasonable doubt because the evidence is weak and her behaviour contradicts her statement <lol>and her quote about Conor angrily choking her whilst mentioning his loss to Khabib is so laughably contrived that anyone with a brain would know its what she thought up.

Civil cases require no evidence apart from an accusation sometimes, which is why they're the preferred method of women looking for a payday. His 2/3 female jury didnt help.

You are emotional, no need to deny it. You're the biggest leftist on the forum so you vehemently defending women wherever you can is expected, if not somewhat pathetic. Still, its entertaining.

I think that going by occam's razor the chances of her stuffing a tampon up herself that far while being really high on drugs as part of a coked up masterplan to get money out of McGregor Vs a guy with a few sexual assault allegations raping her while she had her tampon in the latter is by far the most likely.
If you think her giving herself a quick injury to make her story look more credible is a "masterplan" then you're not very intelligent. Its about as advanced as punching myself in the eye and accusing someone of assaulting me. Certainly nothing damning
 
Was Cosby criminally convicted multiple times? I thought it was just one case, with that female athlete that he settled out of court with in a civil case, then got charged in criminal court years later.

Did you think OJ was innocent?
OJ covered up for his son Jason who committed the murders
 
Really? It's not possible to jam a tampon up there hard? Amazing.

It's difficulty to prove beyond a reasonable doubt because the evidence is weak and her behaviour contradicts her statement <lol>and her quote about Conor angrily choking her whilst mentioning his loss to Khabib is so laughably contrived that anyone with a brain would know its what she thought up.

Civil cases require no evidence apart from an accusation sometimes, which is why they're the preferred method of women looking for a payday. His 2/3 female jury didnt help.

You are emotional, no need to deny it. You're the biggest leftist on the forum so you vehemently defending women wherever you can is expected, if not somewhat pathetic. Still, its entertaining.

Obviously an alt account. Why don't you use your main account?
 
Back
Top