• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

News *** Conor McGregor Found Civilly Liable for 2018 Sexual Assault MEGA THREAD ***

Another one who believes a woman lied to her partner & went to another man's hotel room for a game of chess.

I don't know whether its a cope because it's something your own wives do, but if your wife DOES do this, she's 100% having sex with another man.

The naivety in some men is why so many are raising kids that aren't theirs.
if your posts are anything to go by, you haven’t touched a woman you didn’t have to pay first.
 
Can we have a moment for the victims husband. He's the real mvp. Stayed home with kids while wife was being spitroasted... Even when he realised he'd been cucked he supported her... He stood behind her while she told world outside the courts she played 'hide the sausage' with an unstable mma fighter.. Legend
Replace legend with rapist and you'd be right.
 
A case can be opened when there is probable cause to believe that a crime was committed and that the defendant was responsible. A prosecutor evaluates a criminal case to determine if it can be won by assessing the strength of the evidence available, including whether it is sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Prosecutors look to see if the case can be won on those criterias.

I did not say that Conor did not do it, I said that the conviction in civil court is not the same as

You are making things up because you want things to adapt to your biases.

No, a criminal case is not based on probability of evidential truth. That would be stupid, since proof and evidence is provided at trial. The criterion in every modern court is sufficiency of evidence, not probability. Sufficiency is unfortunately hazily defined.

There are multiple reasons other than objective ones that cases get turned down. Money and corruption is one of the biggest ones, and it's usually more pervasive at the bottom. If you follow, as I did, the Irish reporting, this has been absolutely baffling to everyone that it didn't even go to criminal court, and has raised serious corruption question marks. Ireland has a pretty dire problem with this, and Conor has pretty deep pockets and connections with the Irish cartel. This woman refused a civil court complaint and went first directly to criminal and refused a payout.

Now that the evidence has been on display, you have to be an absolute bigot to ignore it. She was battered, injured, traumatized, and had to have a tampon removed with a forcep. Conor's DNA was in her, not anyone else's. This is doctors, trauma specialists, and cops. I'm not overthinking this, you are under thinking things to match your biases. There is a reason the ruling went against Conor.
 
Another one who believes a woman lied to her partner & went to another man's hotel room for a game of chess.

I don't know whether its a cope because it's something your own wives do, but if your wife DOES do this, she's 100% having sex with another man.

The naivety in some men is why so many are raising kids that aren't theirs.

You are an incredibly stupid human being, who doesn't know how incredibly stupid they are.
 
I would need to educate myself more on the case. Finding his DNA isn't surprising if they had sex. I'm curious to why if she claimed it was a gang bang, the other men were found innocent and only the man with money was found liable. I'd also be curious as to why they all went back to the hotel room. Not saying that absolves a crime or proves innocence but it does indicate a motive. Liable is also different from guilty just as civil is different from criminal. So i'll wait this out to see what's real before condemnation. I believe all rapists should be killed. So I need actual evidence of rape as opposed to evidence of a sexual encounter with a rich man.

How about shutting the fuck up until you have educated yourself on the case then?

Because all you are effectively doing is trying to parade a sense of rational impartiality flaunting ignorance as a virtue when this is a ruled case, where there was evidence and debate in court, and ample reporting about the proceedings. You are voicing skepticism with regard to the ruling while admitting to not knowing the details of the case and proceedings. In other words, you have absolutely nothing to contribute to the conversation.
 
Can we have a moment for the victims husband. He's the real mvp. Stayed home with kids while wife was being spitroasted... Even when he realised he'd been cucked he supported her... He stood behind her while she told world outside the courts she played 'hide the sausage' with an unstable mma fighter.. Legend
From what is said on RTE, the husband was not his boyfriend and she didn’t have a kid in 2018
On the other hand, Dee was 8-month pregnant, already had a kid while her husband was partying with what seems to be a drug dealer and had a room booked at a hotel
 
  • Like
Reactions: lsa
I don't think the drugs changed him; he's always been like this - there was videos and photos of him cheating on Dee being posted on here as far back as the Mendes fight.

Whether he's actually innocent or not, he's still cheated on the mother of his children.
Would it still be cheating if Dee knows about these transgressions? What if they agree that Conor can have an open relationship? What if Dee is a cuck and gets off on him doing this stuff?
 
I don't think the drugs changed him; he's always been like this - there was videos and photos of him cheating on Dee being posted on here as far back as the Mendes fight.

Whether he's actually innocent or not, he's still cheated on the mother of his children.
Conor has always been full of shit. He's got mental issues imo, made worse by unlimited funds and drugs. I don't think he's comfortable in his own skin given how extremely insecure the guy is.
 
the 84 in your name is that your IQ?
Nobody said she was a good girl...
She was drunk as hell and Con or and others did cocaine.

But yes I believe she got raped by Conor based on what I read.

Should she have done what she did? Absolutely not.

Also she had her period...
You really think she wanted to have sex and left the tampon in?

If you think thats normal I wonder about your "wife"....

She didn't just have the tampon on, it was actually incrusted in her vagina and had to be removed by a forcep. When asked, the doctor said he hadn't seen that before. She was also battered and bruised all over her body.

And Conor's DNA was on her, not anyone else's. There are reports of cops, doctors, trauma specialists that testified to her being traumatized for years now.

So what are we to believe? That she had a night out with Conor and Lawrence, had sex, went home safe, got battered up by her bf because she cheated, but he also raped her as her period suddenly started, wearing a condom so his DNA was not there, and incrusted a tampon into her vagina. Then she realized she could get serious money by first prosecuting a criminal case and refusing a buyout, and faking trauma for years, duping doctors and specialists.

People in this forum are fucking disgusting.
 
Last edited:
Would it still be cheating if Dee knows about these transgressions? What if they agree that Conor can have an open relationship? What if Dee is a cuck and gets off on him doing this stuff?

Or how about, wild thought I know, leaving Conor as a mother is not actually just a matter of choice? Wild, I know.

You actually think a guy like Conor would let Dee walk out and take the kids from him?
 
Back
Top