- Joined
- Aug 31, 2016
- Messages
- 38,937
- Reaction score
- 76,198
Such a bad example'civil rape', now there's a contradiction in terms.
conor's like trump, you have to just hope he eventually goes to jail.
Such a bad example'civil rape', now there's a contradiction in terms.
conor's like trump, you have to just hope he eventually goes to jail.
It sounds like she was coached into saying that to denigrate Conor, I just can’t imagine Conor ever being so self deprecating to even mention he ever lost a fight let alone go into fine detail of how many times he tapped out, I can probably believe him saying something like, you’re gonna submit to me bitch, or something like that. I think Conor is a huge douche but just because I dislike him doesn’t mean I want to see him get falsely convicted of rape. But there are people out there,who are so vindictive especially when it comes to politics, they don’t care if he’s truly guilty or not, they’ve designated Conor as a bad person, and he should pay. It’s like what they did with Trump in New York, it’s obvious the judge was extremely biased and the prosecutors helped coach the jury into getting the outcome they wanted using lawfare, because Trump bad, Trump Hitler, and it’s like it’s fine to hate the guy, but don’t try to crucify him over some fake shit because you hate him.He probably did say something along those lines. You can't expect her to remember EXACTLY what he says and how it was phrased in that moment.
ans calling the victim a bitch and a gold digger.
Reading several articles about this case and personally I think is clear he raped her.
The tampon with his DNA on it...
How people can read about that and still believe him / defend him just baffles me.
But good.. At least it shows me what posters to never take serious again
I believe all rapists should be killed. So I need actual evidence of rape as opposed to evidence of a sexual encounter with a rich man.
I would need to educate myself more on the case. Finding his DNA isn't surprising if they had sex. I'm curious to why if she claimed it was a gang bang, the other men were found innocent and only the man with money was found liable. I'd also be curious as to why they all went back to the hotel room. Not saying that absolves a crime or proves innocence but it does indicate a motive. Liable is also different from guilty just as civil is different from criminal. So i'll wait this out to see what's real before condemnation. I believe all rapists should be killed. So I need actual evidence of rape as opposed to evidence of a sexual encounter with a rich man.
What would you think of as "actual evidence"? A complete video taping of what actually went down?
Can we have a moment for the victims husband. He's the real mvp. Stayed home with kids while wife was being spitroasted... Even when he realised he'd been cucked he supported her... He stood behind her while she told world outside the courts she played 'hide the sausage' with an unstable mma fighter.. Legend
You should probably look into the details of the caseBitch just wanted money. Thats it. Conor is trash but i bet they just had sex and then this bitch used it to get money from conor
This reads like someone who has never actually had sex.Well, if you and I had sex there would be my DNA on you. If I was rich and famous and you were a nobody but somehow we met up and went and got a hotel, people would ask your motive, no? The evidence i've seen here is "a tampon embedded in her" which is... anatomically impossible unless homie has a dick that inflates like Tetsuos arm in Akira. So i'm not sure what would qualify seeing as we're 6, almost 7 years down the road from the incident. Point being though... if we have intercourse my DNA will obviously be found in you. That doesn't indicate rape though. I just need evidence of rape before I say ok give the man capital punishment.
Can we have a moment for the victims husband. He's the real mvp. Stayed home with kids while wife was being spitroasted... Even when he realised he'd been cucked he supported her... He stood behind her while she told world outside the courts she played 'hide the sausage' with an unstable mma fighter.. Legend
You should probably look into the details of the case
Lots of guys who clearly haven't been following the case with really strong opinions about it.Yeah you are right you need to educate your self on the case.
She NEVER said it was a gang bang.
She said she NEVER had sex with James Lawrence ( Who claimed she did have sex with him.. Btw Conor paid for his lawyers)
and IF she did she had no recollection of it.
So that means if they had sex it was with out her consent and thats why he was also in the court.
He got freed because there was no proof of them having sex.
Its surprising to me to find his (Conors) DNA on a tampon a doctor had to remove from her.
You think women want to have sex not only on their period but with a tampon in??
Another one who believes a woman lied to her partner & went to another man's hotel room for a game of chess.Yeah you are right you need to educate your self on the case.
She NEVER said it was a gang bang.
She said she NEVER had sex with James Lawrence ( Who claimed she did have sex with him.. Btw Conor paid for his lawyers)
and IF she did she had no recollection of it.
So that means if they had sex it was with out her consent and thats why he was also in the court.
He got freed because there was no proof of them having sex.
Its surprising to me to find his (Conors) DNA on a tampon a doctor had to remove from her.
You think women want to have sex not only on their period but with a tampon in??
Another one who believes a woman lied to her partner & went to another man's hotel room for a game of chess.
I don't know whether its a cope because it's something your own wives do, but if your wife DOES do this, she's 100% having sex with another man.
The naivety in some men is why so many are raising kids that aren't theirs.
The reason it didn't go to a criminal court is because her friend was there and didn't verify her story. She also didn't even remember having sex with the other dude, putting into doubt the rest of her testimony. And no, the tampon didn't need to be surgically removed. There is absolutely reasonable doubt here. The standards for a civil case are much lower.
Another one who believes a woman lied to her partner & went to another man's hotel room for a game of chess.
I don't know whether its a cope because it's something your own wives do, but if your wife DOES do this, she's 100% having sex with another man.
The naivety in some men is why so many are raising kids that aren't theirs.
I wouldn't doubt it if they all had herpes considering what type of outstanding girls Conor has "consensual sex" with.She is a smart girl, she allowed an open relationship one way.