• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

News *** Conor McGregor Found Civilly Liable for 2018 Sexual Assault MEGA THREAD ***

Can we have a moment for the victims husband. He's the real mvp. Stayed home with kids while wife was being spitroasted... Even when he realised he'd been cucked he supported her... He stood behind her while she told world outside the courts she played 'hide the sausage' with an unstable mma fighter.. Legend
 
He probably did say something along those lines. You can't expect her to remember EXACTLY what he says and how it was phrased in that moment.
It sounds like she was coached into saying that to denigrate Conor, I just can’t imagine Conor ever being so self deprecating to even mention he ever lost a fight let alone go into fine detail of how many times he tapped out, I can probably believe him saying something like, you’re gonna submit to me bitch, or something like that. I think Conor is a huge douche but just because I dislike him doesn’t mean I want to see him get falsely convicted of rape. But there are people out there,who are so vindictive especially when it comes to politics, they don’t care if he’s truly guilty or not, they’ve designated Conor as a bad person, and he should pay. It’s like what they did with Trump in New York, it’s obvious the judge was extremely biased and the prosecutors helped coach the jury into getting the outcome they wanted using lawfare, because Trump bad, Trump Hitler, and it’s like it’s fine to hate the guy, but don’t try to crucify him over some fake shit because you hate him.

I’m not sure how it works in Ireland, can Conor appeal this? One thing working against Conor, I believe this woman came out right away after the alleged rape happened, she’s not like these other women who wait 30 years and go, oh yeah he raped him! And a jury convicted off of no evidence other than her solemn testimony. There has to be more than just he said she said. I don’t know if she took a rape test immediately afterwards, I believe she did hence why he said it was consensual. So yeah the deck is really stacked against him more so than other ppl falsely accused of rape or sexual assault. I mean, he just looks fucking guilty as shit.
 
Lol, i doubt he said that, but it's funny either way.
 
ans calling the victim a bitch and a gold digger.

Reading several articles about this case and personally I think is clear he raped her.

The tampon with his DNA on it...
How people can read about that and still believe him / defend him just baffles me.
But good.. At least it shows me what posters to never take serious again

I would need to educate myself more on the case. Finding his DNA isn't surprising if they had sex. I'm curious to why if she claimed it was a gang bang, the other men were found innocent and only the man with money was found liable. I'd also be curious as to why they all went back to the hotel room. Not saying that absolves a crime or proves innocence but it does indicate a motive. Liable is also different from guilty just as civil is different from criminal. So i'll wait this out to see what's real before condemnation. I believe all rapists should be killed. So I need actual evidence of rape as opposed to evidence of a sexual encounter with a rich man.
 
I believe all rapists should be killed. So I need actual evidence of rape as opposed to evidence of a sexual encounter with a rich man.

What would you think of as "actual evidence"? A complete video taping of what actually went down?
 
I would need to educate myself more on the case. Finding his DNA isn't surprising if they had sex. I'm curious to why if she claimed it was a gang bang, the other men were found innocent and only the man with money was found liable. I'd also be curious as to why they all went back to the hotel room. Not saying that absolves a crime or proves innocence but it does indicate a motive. Liable is also different from guilty just as civil is different from criminal. So i'll wait this out to see what's real before condemnation. I believe all rapists should be killed. So I need actual evidence of rape as opposed to evidence of a sexual encounter with a rich man.

Yeah you are right you need to educate your self on the case.
She NEVER said it was a gang bang.

She said she NEVER had sex with James Lawrence ( Who claimed she did have sex with him.. Btw Conor paid for his lawyers)
and IF she did she had no recollection of it.
So that means if they had sex it was with out her consent and thats why he was also in the court.
He got freed because there was no proof of them having sex.

Its surprising to me to find his (Conors) DNA on a tampon a doctor had to remove from her.
You think women want to have sex not only on their period but with a tampon in??
 
What would you think of as "actual evidence"? A complete video taping of what actually went down?

Well, if you and I had sex there would be my DNA on you. If I was rich and famous and you were a nobody but somehow we met up and went and got a hotel, people would ask your motive, no? The evidence i've seen here is "a tampon embedded in her" which is... anatomically impossible unless homie has a dick that inflates like Tetsuos arm in Akira. So i'm not sure what would qualify seeing as we're 6, almost 7 years down the road from the incident. Point being though... if we have intercourse my DNA will obviously be found in you. That doesn't indicate rape though. I just need evidence of rape before I say ok give the man capital punishment.
 
Can we have a moment for the victims husband. He's the real mvp. Stayed home with kids while wife was being spitroasted... Even when he realised he'd been cucked he supported her... He stood behind her while she told world outside the courts she played 'hide the sausage' with an unstable mma fighter.. Legend

Anyone know if the “boyfriend” is the same one from the year of the incident? Assumed it was someone fresh tbh.

Lol if it’s the same chap.
 
Well, if you and I had sex there would be my DNA on you. If I was rich and famous and you were a nobody but somehow we met up and went and got a hotel, people would ask your motive, no? The evidence i've seen here is "a tampon embedded in her" which is... anatomically impossible unless homie has a dick that inflates like Tetsuos arm in Akira. So i'm not sure what would qualify seeing as we're 6, almost 7 years down the road from the incident. Point being though... if we have intercourse my DNA will obviously be found in you. That doesn't indicate rape though. I just need evidence of rape before I say ok give the man capital punishment.
This reads like someone who has never actually had sex.
 
Can we have a moment for the victims husband. He's the real mvp. Stayed home with kids while wife was being spitroasted... Even when he realised he'd been cucked he supported her... He stood behind her while she told world outside the courts she played 'hide the sausage' with an unstable mma fighter.. Legend

well she got a bag of money coming her way.. he might stay long enough to get a taste of that..
 
Yeah you are right you need to educate your self on the case.
She NEVER said it was a gang bang.

She said she NEVER had sex with James Lawrence ( Who claimed she did have sex with him.. Btw Conor paid for his lawyers)
and IF she did she had no recollection of it.
So that means if they had sex it was with out her consent and thats why he was also in the court.
He got freed because there was no proof of them having sex.

Its surprising to me to find his (Conors) DNA on a tampon a doctor had to remove from her.
You think women want to have sex not only on their period but with a tampon in??
Lots of guys who clearly haven't been following the case with really strong opinions about it.
 
Yeah you are right you need to educate your self on the case.
She NEVER said it was a gang bang.

She said she NEVER had sex with James Lawrence ( Who claimed she did have sex with him.. Btw Conor paid for his lawyers)
and IF she did she had no recollection of it.
So that means if they had sex it was with out her consent and thats why he was also in the court.
He got freed because there was no proof of them having sex.

Its surprising to me to find his (Conors) DNA on a tampon a doctor had to remove from her.
You think women want to have sex not only on their period but with a tampon in??
Another one who believes a woman lied to her partner & went to another man's hotel room for a game of chess.

I don't know whether its a cope because it's something your own wives do, but if your wife DOES do this, she's 100% having sex with another man.

The naivety in some men is why so many are raising kids that aren't theirs.
 
Another one who believes a woman lied to her partner & went to another man's hotel room for a game of chess.

I don't know whether its a cope because it's something your own wives do, but if your wife DOES do this, she's 100% having sex with another man.

The naivety in some men is why so many are raising kids that aren't theirs.

Wait a god damn moment.

So my wife isn’t going out most Saturday nights to play chess like she tells me she is doing?
 
The reason it didn't go to a criminal court is because her friend was there and didn't verify her story. She also didn't even remember having sex with the other dude, putting into doubt the rest of her testimony. And no, the tampon didn't need to be surgically removed. There is absolutely reasonable doubt here. The standards for a civil case are much lower.

You are talking about things you don't know about.

You do not refuse to open a case on the basis of reasonable doubt, that's a criterion for conviction, not for opening a case. Where did you get the idea that the criminal case was turned doubt because of Danielle's testimony or lack thereof before the civil trial? You're making this up.

She never said she had sex with Lawrence, she said she didn't remember any of that.

The tampon was removed by a doctor with a forcep. That is a surgical procedure by definition, it was incrusted into her vagina and showed signs of potential tear. His DNA was in her, not Lawrence's nor anyone elses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lsa
Another one who believes a woman lied to her partner & went to another man's hotel room for a game of chess.

I don't know whether its a cope because it's something your own wives do, but if your wife DOES do this, she's 100% having sex with another man.

The naivety in some men is why so many are raising kids that aren't theirs.

the 84 in your name is that your IQ?
Nobody said she was a good girl...
She was drunk as hell and Con or and others did cocaine.

But yes I believe she got raped by Conor based on what I read.

Should she have done what she did? Absolutely not.

Also she had her period...
You really think she wanted to have sex and left the tampon in?

If you think thats normal I wonder about your "wife"....
 
Back
Top