• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

News *** Conor McGregor Found Civilly Liable for 2018 Sexual Assault MEGA THREAD ***

Well at least he says no to drugs!
Coke abusers are very overrepresented when it comes to rape.
Take large amounts of it and pretty much anything will turn into a yes!
According to studies. Coke rapers often believe both are gonna have a good time!
So not bad intentions but still a very rapy experience for the other part of the equation!

Must be weird getting raped by someone too yes happy on coke!
At least birds trying to rape me are drunk out of their minds and easy to get away from.
 
Last edited:
The problem here is no different to anywhere else, unless you've been through it (and I have) you don't understand it.

Words used by the court to describe their processes are bastardised. They're not used in a way that a normal average person would use them. I'd argue they're bastardised to give legitimacy to civil courts, because if the public knew the truth, there would be outrage.

What do I mean by this? So, in English civil cases (Ireland will be similar), prior to the court hearing there is a finding of fact. This consists of evidence being presented by both sides. These facts are the presented to the judges or jury. Think about what YOU think this means before reading the next part.

So, 'evidence' provided for a 'finding of fact' is often a statement or an argument made by an accuser. A story, a set of events and a list of allegations. 'Facts' are established, based on this 'evidence'.

One side tells a story, and as already mentioned here, you decide which side you believe is MORE likely to be telling the truth, even if you're 51% sure.

I'd argue that overwhelmingly, in most peoples minds, 'evidence' is concrete. Something definite, something presentable to court. And a 'fact' or 'finding of fact' is something truthful based on evidence. This is not how civil courts operate.

'Proof beyond a reasonable doubt'. Proof. 'conclusive/definitive'. Civil Court is 'proof' based on 'facts' based on 'evidence' that is just one persons words.
 
She battered herself the next day and drove the tampon up herself

She had loving, consensual sex with conor and his mate

I also believe in Santa Claus and the Easter bunny

Fucking low I.q idiots
You are getting too emotional about this and emotional about nothing anyone said in here. No one said Conor was not guilty of anything, they are defining civil and criminal cases and asking questions.

There is a court of law that deals with facts and truth and that is where this should go. Just because you believe the story does not mean everyone will. It is a sad story but it should have gone to criminal court if it was that damning.
 
Not even a page in and there's rape apologists. Gosh I hate this place sometimes.

The worst is when they flat out admit that they weren't following the case. like, " I don't know all the evidence, but blah blah, money grab, blah blah, civil case not same as criminal,blah blah blah, girls do this all the time for money."
 
The rape apologists out in full force.
I hope @HHJ is proud of me, I finally started my ignore list in full speed cuz of this shit. I've had plenty of users I disagree with on things and laugh with about on other things, and the whole "Let's be incredibly specific about the difference between criminal and civil" is one thing, but the fuckin rats piling in to just blatantly disbelieve and accuse, I don't need to bother reading their opinions on a goddamned thing.
 
Not even a page in and there's rape apologists. Gosh I hate this place sometimes.
bruh, this happens literally every time
i remember when the christy mack - war machine stuff broke back in the day, and on the first page of replies there were losers blaming her
 
I hope @HHJ is proud of me, I finally started my ignore list in full speed cuz of this shit. I've had plenty of users I disagree with on things and laugh with about on other things, and the whole "Let's be incredibly specific about the difference between criminal and civil" is one thing, but the fuckin rats piling in to just blatantly disbelieve and accuse, I don't need to bother reading their opinions on a goddamned thing.
Like angels and flat earth 😁
 
He was calling her out for being a lying whore meanwhile he’s the biggest one lol
 
I honestly don't know much about the whole porn star deal, was talking more about his propped up charges of document extraction, impeachment and all that bs; the porn star charge whatever that may be will just qualify into the same category . How do I know they are fake? Because I understand the game from a higher perspective, delve into esoteric understanding of things, and the structure of control that is being presented to a casual participant.
sources: dude, trust me
 
Back
Top