- Joined
- Aug 31, 2017
- Messages
- 2,355
- Reaction score
- 5,641
No you goof, you started a dialog with me when I was discussing "What is a woman" with someone else. That was the discussion. Then you got mad because I wasn't talking about what you wanted to talk about lol.yeah and i can say you are a dog, it doesn't mean you are legally a dog. that's how forum works, dudes posting here doesn't translate directly into legislation. since she's intersex, she can use the girls bathroom at will, since her assigned sex at birth was female. she's not a tranny.
no, the law is not about intersex, it's about trannies. why aren't you able of making the distinction?
so what? you started a new dialogue with me. i don't give a shit what you talked with somebody else before. and since you continued, while i repeatedly made the distinction between trannies and intersex, this is a YOU problem.
No one is saying make sex crimes legal lol. We are saying that making their mere presence illegal causes more issues than it solves.that's how the law works. in this case, if caught, there's penalties.
we don't stop making laws because "criminals would do crime anyway". what sort of gutter trash mentality is this?
Bullshit. There are super passable people on both sides.a transman is a woman. and most of them just look like butch ugly women. there's no law against going to the bathroom while ugly. if that was the case, you'd be pissing in the bushes.
I'm sure these hicks defending their wives from the Trannies of Target are going to be real understanding that if a person with a beard walks in the women's restroom, it must simply be a transman now that the good laws are protecting us.
people that do that to "our sons" aren't welcomed while doing it. they're treated as creeps and even prosecuted for indecent exposure. it's a dumb hypothetical. i've been in men's bathrooms for coming on 40 years and nobody has waved their dick around. but having a dick inside a women's bathroom is obviously different, if your brain isn't under 90IQ.
yes, and they are arrested.
and no dicks in the woman's bathroom is a sign of civilization. no civilization worth being called that shifts it's dynamic to cater to a bunch of creepy loons.
That's my point.
If it's already illegal to do this shit, so why kick them out? Won't they be arrested if they do this shit anyway? Like, is a trespassing charge on top of those other charges really the difference that's going to make people think twice about raping women in the bathroom?