- Joined
- Oct 23, 2017
- Messages
- 21,893
- Reaction score
- 21,226
You really have to pinpoint the metrics, it's incredibly important in this discussion. Last I checked, testing is far from cheap, and testing to prevent any one of your fighters from flagging to prevent a meaningful fine from befalling a camp is even more expensive. Understand, when most sports approach testing, they don't even approach the blood, they usually do piss tests, which is a joke for anyone in the know. So now camps have to be responsible for blood testing? Which camps can even afford that? And for the camps that can afford it, will the fine be meaningful enough in comparison to the funds they generate from their pro athletes, the attention they get from producing champions and top fighters, which draw revenue from other fighters and even casuals to sign up? It's hard for me to take this approach seriously, because it's not like every top fighter is even locked down to a camp these days, the best, especially in boxing, jump from camp to camp depending on what they are looking for heading into a fight. Hell, some fighters pull trainers to them, which you could imagine would create a nightmare scenario for holding anyone accountable besides the fighter. That makes the idea of holding camps responsible even worse to manage at that level.
We could get a bit more serious about your specific approach if you want, because there are a lot of glaring holes to cover, I see the point of what you are going for, it's understandable, but I think you are falling for the delusion of a clean sport, and your proposal really only leads to throwing more money down the drain to further that delusion. I say USADA is enough if you want to uphold that delusion, that money could go elsewhere and we would likely be provided a greater spectacle for doing so, but I know people love the idea of holding cheaters accountable. lol It's nothing that concerns me at all, I welcome the aspect, it's interesting. What is "fair" is an irrelevancy in sporting to anyone reasonable individual, how can "fair" be applied to a Jon Jones, Usian Bolt, Michael Phelps, or Kipchoge? Of course we have rules within our sports, which I definitely welcome, but the idea of fairness outside of that is silly, imo. Although I take a very deterministic approach to life so I'm familiar with how off-putting that can be to most.
Your post is a little bit confusing cuz you said fairness should be based off of the rules of the sport but is isn't performance enhancing drugs against the rules so wouldn't it be in fairness that they're not allowed...
You say you want the sport to be fair within the rules will the rules state that you shouldn't be using performance enhancing drugs so that right there it kind of defeats the purpose of your earlier part of the argument