Not only that, people seem to think investigators acted without some reason to believe the source even though it has turned out to be credible. And the same people would have us believe investigations that are based partially on an informant aren't warranted unless the informant really likes the accused.
You can't use witnesses and testimony!
So far those arguments have and will boil down to iterations of "It wasn't illegal".
I jokingly predicted in another thread that someone would post "It's not like he killed somebody" but then someone actually posted it pages later in sincerity.
It's all small "it"s that will be slowly revealed as forming Donald Trump's personal Mount Everest of shenanigans.
I wonder.
They did end up nabbing Gotti, and Capone, at the end of the day. I find it amazing Trump has so much support after these relevations, but if they just keep piling up like this, it'll be hard for him to dig himself out.
You know a man by the company he keeps.
He established that anything damning is "fake news".
![{<hhh]](http://i.imgur.com/qoAggsG.png "hhh {<hhh]")
Evidence of Russian Collusion in the Mueller probe so far = ZERO
'Cause you know....that's what this whole thing is originally about. Just saying.
