- Joined
- Apr 3, 2002
- Messages
- 30,290
- Reaction score
- 28,452
I wouldn't call it neutral. He flat out called CNN and the Washington Post unreliable news agencies and therefore did not believe the story they reported. I understand his desire to not comment on negative aspects of the story that might overshadow John McCain's legacy, but he could have refused to comment without plainly insulting the program he was appearing on. Once you go there, it's pretty hard to expect the interviewer to remain completely cordial. It was hilarious watching her try to contain her anger though.
I guess, but he initially called the Washington Post (not CNN) report unreliable, but then she Cut him off, saying they have the same story.
If I'm not mistaken, at the time, it was an "anonymous source from within the white house". Not sure if it has since been proven or supported by a more reliable source.
As soon as she brought up the story, he probably knew where the interview was going, and when she cut him off, probably knew she was going to press him on the issue.
I am also not sure if CNN and wash post are apart of the same company