I was mistaken about the comic con. Fair enough.
You've been mistaken about every single point you've made, since, them being at a comic con was never one of your points, so since I'm magnanimous let's just call that a wash
So, I watched the first six minutes of your hour-long video (which is as far as I'm likely to go) and Punk says "my
assumption is that we're drawing from the cinematic Drax because that's what's in the mainstream. That's what people recognise."
His assumption? Punk doesn't even know what version of the character he's going to be writing, and you think that he somehow told you?
They've done these solo titles for two other Guardians characters, and neither was based on the cinematic version. clearly he is uniformed.
He is writing an established character with comic canon.
Punk is the junior writer here. He is going to be babysat, and will have little creative control.
You clearly are not.
They already changed his whole personality in 2008 (or sometime around then). The version that Punk will be writing is a version of the character that already exists. And not the version from the movie.
And you know how I know this? Because they showed the character on the cover of the upcoming title in the video that you linked.
I'm going back on my last statement. I think you owe me an apology if only because you have a comic book character as your AV, but you are clearly not a comic book fan.
You're not even a comic book nerd, you're a failed comic book nerd.