But it says exactly the opposite in the scoring criteria. 9 solid strikes weighs more than 5 solid and 15 pitter patter.If I land 20 strikes, and you land 10, 15 of mine were feelers and 5 were solid, meanwhile you land 9 solid and only 1 feeler - my volume matters.
That's all I'm saying. A few solid shots doesn't outweigh workrate throughout a round.
1, 2 and 5.
No surprise from a Diaz fan boy
Yeah, "wrecked" me bro.
Let's play by your rules. I'm pretty sure Cruz got butted right?
So Cody didn't get "damaged" at all right?
Well I guess Dillashaw beat Cruz in your book then?But it says exactly the opposite in the scoring criteria.
Your opinion isn't fact. You're scoring fights incorrectly.
Didn't once say that Cody took less damage, I'm saying he didn't exactly come out unscathed.Lol those are scratches from the gloves. show a picture of Dominic right now I guarantee you it is 20 times worse than that.
I scored it for Killashaw.Well I guess Dillashaw beat Cruz in your book then?
So you didn't watch Jon Jones vs Shogun?That was most impressive performance if ever seen from a title challenger. He is the next golden goose.
If I land 20 strikes, and you land 10, 15 of mine were feelers and 5 were solid, meanwhile you land 9 solid and only 1 feeler - my volume matters.
That's all I'm saying. A few solid shots doesn't outweigh workrate throughout a round.
1, 2 and 5.
New rules aren't active yet though, so even if your point is correct, it's not yet relevant.Yes it does.....watch BJMs breakdown of the new rules of scoring a fight. He specifically addresses this topic and how damaging and hard strikes count far more even if there is less volume. Cruz was not effectively landing at all, Cody was landing the hard strikes which were also the srikes that affected the pace and flow of the fight.
What in the world are u on about, brah?instead pussies like you sit by and go ha ha, you got a fucked up face, nah nah nah nah, when Cody's face is pretty fucked up too.
The "new rules" are a clarification of language used. Damage over volume was amended in Aug 2015 and adopted Jan 2016 and 'damage' has always been in the criteria, despite that word not actually being used.New rules aren't active yet though, so even if your point is correct, it's not yet relevant.
2 and 5 yes, Round 1 is not even close when you re watch the fight, clearly 10-9 to CodyAbout to rewatch it, but are you telling me there is no way Cruz could have won 1, 2 and 5?
What is so ludicrous about that?
Whenever you have no Logical rebuttal, you ask a deflective question. smh.Well I guess Dillashaw beat Cruz in your book then?
Dom isn't scoring the fight. Fighters who get knocked down several times and leave the cage covered in blood normally think they lost.
You think if Dom had squeezed a draw he'd have turned around and said "I thought I lost" ? I don't see it.
Damage is not a scoring criteria by the way.