Elections Clinton vs Trump Polls thread (Clinton's Bounce Larger than Trump's)

Prediction on Win Margin for Election Night (Electoral College)


  • Total voters
    88
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
And something to consider when looking at the favorable ratings. Well first off they are neck and neck in those polls so Hillary really doesn't have an advantage as it is. But as time goes on Trump has the opportunity to improve his...Hillary does not.

Trump can still win people over through sheer personality and policy positions many of which are new and fresh ideas. If he cleans up some of his behavior and language he will get a bump in likability. If he starts to gain momentum it can build off of itself which will improve his likability. Hillary on the other hand is pretty much maxed out. She has no personality and charisma...just sounds like an old grandma anymore. Old man Bernie looks young and energetic in comparison. She has no new policy positions and just wants to continue Obama's agenda. She's part of the old system that the majority of American's have rejected in the primaries. And she has a ton of personal and professional baggage that can only drag her down as it all comes back out to the forefront.

This is Trump's election to lose.
 
This election is ridiculous.

The only winning move is not to vote.
 
Oh I see, well if it is strongly unfavorable.......................

In the polls that alot of different polling companies do, where they ask favorable, or unfavorable, she is polling about 6% in front of him last I looked, which is by definition a fact that this makes her the second most unfavorable candidate to ever win a nomination, only behind Trump.

Clinton is unfavorable within "normal parameters". Yes, she would be the most unfavorable of all time, but only by a few points.

Trump has flown past everyone in the unfavorable category. Nearly 20 points higher than Clinton, and 20 points or more above everyone else EVER. It is actually impressive how disliked he is while being the presumptive nominee.
 
Clinton is unfavorable within "normal parameters". Yes, she would be the most unfavorable of all time, but only by a few points.

Trump has flown past everyone in the unfavorable category. Nearly 20 points higher than Clinton, and 20 points or more above everyone else EVER. It is actually impressive how disliked he is while being the presumptive nominee.

According to the polls madmick posted there is only a 4 point difference in their unfavorable ratings.
 
And something to consider when looking at the favorable ratings. Well first off they are neck and neck in those polls so Hillary really doesn't have an advantage as it is. But as time goes on Trump has the opportunity to improve his...Hillary does not.

Trump can still win people over through sheer personality and policy positions many of which are new and fresh ideas. If he cleans up some of his behavior and language he will get a bump in likability. If he starts to gain momentum it can build off of itself which will improve his likability. Hillary on the other hand is pretty much maxed out. She has no personality and charisma...just sounds like an old grandma anymore. Old man Bernie looks young and energetic in comparison. She has no new policy positions and just wants to continue Obama's agenda. She's part of the old system that the majority of American's have rejected in the primaries. And she has a ton of personal and professional baggage that can only drag her down as it all comes back out to the forefront.

This is Trump's election to lose.


Trump University.
 
Trump has secured the nomination while Clinton is still in a primary contest. You would expect Trump poll numbers to improve. Just as you can expect Clinton's numbers to improve when she wins the nomination.
 
Last edited:
If Hillary wasn't trying to paint Trump as anti-woman than it wouldn't be very relevant. But when she is accusing Trump of being bad for women while married to a serial sexual abuser is incredibly relevant.
That's in the past. Jesus would say to forgive and forget and I would agree.
 
Dodge on what?

You just across as a typical, triggered whiney SJW; I wouldn't care too much if it was some other poster because I'd just accuse their jimmies of having gone through severe russlefication.

But the fact that you're a mod? Sad!
Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they're a sjw silly head :rolleyes:
 
That's in the past. Jesus would say to forgive and forget and I would agree.

Jesus never said that we should forget. He also says that one should repent in order to be forgiven. Has Bill and Hillary ever repented from their mistreatment of women?
 
Jesus never said that we should forget. He also says that one should repent in order to be forgiven. Has Bill and Hillary ever repented from their mistreatment of women?
Has Drumpf? How do you know they haven't? Do you think Jesus would constantly bring up something like that in order to smear a person? You forgot to respond to my post in the other thread about the Drumpfs history of questionable racial remarks and discriminating rental practices.
 
No, you just have to provide some context for why you bring it up.


Because your post seems to imply that Trump is without baggage and nothing is going to effective his polling.

I suggest you read up on Trump University.
 
Trump has secured the nomination while Clinton is still in a primary contest. You would expect Trump poll numbers improve. Just as you can expect Clinton's numbers to improve when she wins the nomination.


Hillary is the nominee. Bernie would have to win every state remaining by 25 points or more. I believe he hasn't won a single state by such a margin so it's incredibly unlikely he's going to win all remaining states by that much.

If this was the Republican primary Bernie would have been relegated before Cruz.
 
Has Drumpf? How do you know they haven't? Do you think Jesus would constantly bring up something like that in order to smear a person?

You ask the silliest questions. And what has Trump done that he would need to apologize for in regards to women? And even if you can point to something again its not him making this election about women so he is not obligated to present a nice clean record in that regard.

You forgot to respond to my post in the other thread about the Drumpfs history of questionable racial remarks and discriminating rental practices.

No I didn't lol. I haven't taken the time to look into those stories and those allegations to determine how much of it is bullshit vs legitimate and how much that will effect the country should he be president. Therefore I have not a whole lot to add. I do know that the best thing that minorities could have, especially african americans, are some jobs and a strong economy and country.
 
Because your post seems to imply that Trump is without baggage and nothing is going to effective his polling.

I suggest you read up on Trump University.

Oh I see. Well surely by now you understand that baggage doesn't effect Trump the way it does Hillary, right? I don't see Trump University becoming much of an issue. Rubio tried to hammer him with it and it did absolutely nothing.
 
Oh I see. Well surely by now you understand that baggage doesn't effect Trump the way it does Hillary, right? I don't see Trump University becoming much of an issue. Rubio tried to hammer him with it and it did absolutely nothing.


I think you'll find the Democratic campaign apparatus is much more professional and relentless compared to Marco Rubio.
 
I think you'll find the Democratic campaign apparatus is much more professional and relentless compared to Marco Rubio.

And I think you will find that the Democratic campaign apparatus, although highly professional and relentless, will be just as ineffective as Rubio was.

And if the best there is "Trump University" then he doesn't have much to worry about compared to emails, benghazi, sexual assaults, enabling, lybia, iraq, nafta, political corruption, and others.
 
You ask the silliest questions. And what has Trump done that he would need to apologize for in regards to women? And even if you can point to something again its not him making this election about women so he is not obligated to present a nice clean record in that regard.

I love how libs think his chauvinistic attitude is one of the most important issues in this election. As if a damn good portion of women aren't attracted to that type of personality, and all men are limp wristed feminist vegans, who think he's an incomprehensible monster.

The libs are so far up their own asses on shit like that. Much like how they're shocked that some want to keep the coal industry alive to feed their families, instead of being more concerned with global warming.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top