Social Globalized transtifada movement - trans violence megathread

[Madmick]

But it's not?

The Gun Violence Archive, an independent organization that tracks gun-related violence in the U.S., defines mass shootings as incidents in which there are “a minimum of four victims shot, either injured or killed, not including any shooter who may also have been killed or injured in the incident.” Under this standard, there were 5,748 mass shootings between Jan. 1, 2013, and Sept. 15, 2025, according to the GVA. “OF THAT NUMBER OF INCIDENTS, there have been FIVE CONFIRMED Transgender shooters,” Mark Bryant, the GVA’s founding executive director, told us in an email.

That's a specific but loose definition of mass shooting. I went into depth on this years ago. That doesn't specify the shooting must take place in a location accessible to the public, it doesn't rule out drug-related crime or gang violence or family violence or workplace shootings, it actually requires four victims other than the shooter, etc.

As I showed in a previous post, The Violence Project Database uses a much more restrictive definition than that, focused more on the sort of terroristic violence we associate with Columbine-type mass shootings, and at the time I compiled that post, there had been 2 trans shooters out of 15 counted since November 2022, which put them at 15.0x the rate of non-trans people respective to their population. That was a small sample, but there had been 7 mass shooters since 2018 (these past few would make it 8 and 9 assuming there aren't others missed, and there probably are, although one of these 2 was Canadian). That's looking at shootings that may not have killed 4 other than the shooter, but also focused on a more terroristic nature of the shooting.

I don't believe the GVA has put much effort at all into tracking this identifying trait, but the spike in terroristic mass shootings by transgenders is definitely a more recent phenomenon that only began to arise in the past decade.

 

[My Spot]

That's a specific but loose definition of mass shooting. I went into depth on this years ago. That doesn't specify the shooting must take place in a location accessible to the public, it doesn't rule out drug-related crime or gang violence or family violence or workplace shootings, it actually requires four victims other than the shooter, etc.

As I showed in a previous post, The Violence Project Database uses a much more restrictive definition than that, focused more on the sort of terroristic violence we associate with Columbine-type mass shootings, and at the time I compiled that post, there had been 2 trans shooters out of 15 counted since November 2022, which put them at 15.0x the rate of non-trans people respective to their population. That was a small sample, but there had been 7 mass shooters since 2018 (these past few would make it 8 and 9 assuming there aren't others missed, and there probably are, although one of these 2 was Canadian). That's looking at shootings that may not have killed 4 other than the shooter, but also focused on a more terroristic nature of the shooting.

I don't believe the GVA has put much effort at all into tracking this identifying trait, but the spike in terroristic mass shootings by transgenders is definitely a more recent phenomenon that only began to arise in the past decade.

Well feel free to add it to the Wiki.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_the_United_States

 

[Madmick]

Well feel free to add it to the Wiki.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_the_United_States

Why? The shootings I mentioned that qualify are already included. That Wiki just refers to the GVA, and neither is focused on sexuality or sexual identity.

You can tell that if you look at their own datasets. There isn't even a column for sexual identity. In fact, they don't even maintain a column for gender in their mass shooting CSVs. They track location, date, victims, suspects. That's it. So take any information they offer on these facts with a grain of salt. It hasn't been their focus with the project.

 

[My Spot]

Why? The shootings I mentioned that qualify are already included. That Wiki just refers to the GVA, and neither is focused on sexuality or sexual identity.

You can tell that if you look at their own datasets. There isn't even a column for sexual identity. In fact, they don't even maintain a column for gender in their mass shooting CSVs. They track location, date, victims, suspects. That's it. So take any information they offer on these facts with a grain of salt. It hasn't been their focus with the project.

Both GVA and MST track names and pictures with multiple links. I already posted the spreadsheet for 2025 earlier in this thread.

 

[Madmick]

Both GVA and MST track names and pictures with multiple links. I already posted the spreadsheet for 2025 earlier in this thread.

I know, but if those facts aren't compiled in the spreadsheets, then from where are you extrapolating statistics on identity?

 

[GrantB13]

Can someone explain the direct link between transgender ideology and shootings? What's the motivation that suddenly makes them want to shoot places up? I don't think there's really much to go on.

It seems things happen in trends. For a while theater shootings were the big repeated story. Then schools. Now trans. Is it more likely that the ideas feed off of previous incidents? I would imagine that the trans people who are thinking of doing something see the stories already being talked about and follow suit.

Regardless, the ideas that simply being trans and labeled mentally ill means you're more likely to shoot people over other people who are also mentally ill doesn't make sense. Where's the causal link?

 

[My Spot]

I know, but if those facts aren't compiled in the spreadsheets, then from where are you extrapolating statistics on identity?

Well even your Violence Project Database shows only 1 out of 202 as being trans.

 

[Ares Black]

Can someone explain the direct link between transgender ideology and shootings? What's the motivation that suddenly makes them want to shoot places up? I don't think there's really much to go on.

It seems things happen in trends. For a while theater shootings were the big repeated story. Then schools. Now trans. Is it more likely that the ideas feed off of previous incidents? I would imagine that the trans people who are thinking of doing something see the stories already being talked about and follow suit.

Regardless, the ideas that simply being trans and labeled mentally ill means you're more likely to shoot people over other people who are also mentally ill doesn't make sense. Where's the causal link?

It's a media narrative that isn't supported by statistics.

 

[ShadowRun]

"I'm gonna keep responding even though I think you're a troll!"

 

[My Spot]

 

[Madmick]

Well even your Violence Project Database shows only 1 out of 202 as being trans.

And this is precisely why you should distrust things on face value. As I documented and highlighted in my past post-- both of these qualify:

2023 Nashville school shooting - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Aiden Hale

and...

Colorado Springs nightclub shooting - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Records indicate that Aldrich was a target of online bullying that involved homophobic taunts while in middle school. Aldrich's attorneys have said in court documents that their client identifies as non-binary and uses they/them pronouns, preferring to be addressed as Mx. Aldrich.

 

[My Spot]

And this is precisely why you should distrust things on face value. As I documented and highlighted in my past post-- both of these qualify:

2023 Nashville school shooting - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Aiden Hale

and...

Colorado Springs nightclub shooting - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

And according to your same Violence Project, what happened in Rhode Island doesn't count either since 4 people excluding the shooter had to be killed.

 

[KnightTemplar]

And according to your same Violence Project, what happened in Rhode Island doesn't count either since 4 people excluding the shooter had to be killed.

I'm sure that's a great comfort to the two innocent victims who were murdered.

 

[Ares Black]

Colorado Springs nightclub shooting - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Lol as if you actually believe that

 

[My Spot]

I'm sure that's a great comfort to the two innocent victims who were murdered.

I'm not the one who brought it up.

 

[Madmick]

And according to your same Violence Project, what happened in Rhode Island doesn't count either since 4 people excluding the shooter had to be killed.

I'm aware. I even tipped my hat to the silliness of these definitions in my first post on this most recent shooting:

So there was another (near) mass shooting at a youth hockey game...

I'm not counting Rhode Island towards the 2 out of 15 from which the 15.0x rate was calculated. That's a very small sample size in the first place. But so will any figure be that only goes back to November 2022 and requires such a high body count. Even the more relaxed definitions that focus purely on terroristic violence, but don't require 4+ victims, won't have a great sample size. There was only 7 at the time I counted going back to April 2018. The recent Canada shooting and this brings it up to 9. But the first seven I drew from a tweet. It was hardly an exhaustive investigation into everyone that lived or identified as "nonbinary" that would qualify. Just one random guy tweeting.

And one of those he included was disputed by the media despite that the kid's own social media had him personally testifying that he identified as trans. That's the current one is swimming against when evaluating this. And it doesn't include people like Tyler Robinson who killed Charlie Kirk out of vendetta against Kirk due to his comments about transsexuals, when Tyler himself said that was his main motivation, because Tyler is merely homosexual to my knowledge.

This is why I'm mocking P-values. This isn't a criminology report. It's a casual but powerful anecdotal observation of a conspicuously, drastically elevated rate of terroristic violence by a group that throughout my life was never associated with violence (quite the opposite). It's strange. It raises an eyebrow. The world has noticed, or is beginning to notice.

 

[PBAC]

Idk, reminds me of that shooting at a boxing match at a hotel in Dublin where some gangbangers went in and shot up the place dressed like girls. Seems like a useful way for criminals to distort the narrative or focus of their actions if they hide behind some social or political cause. The photo shows a regular guy just wearing girls clothes. I mean he's henched, bedecked in tatts like he just threw on a disguise staying fuck it anyway.

 

[AWilder]

I remember a few weeks ago when you posted that you are a White Nationalist while making a racist and gross comment about black people. You got dubs for doing that. Should have been a ban.

They let the nazis in the bar...

 

[ShadowRun]

 

[Madmick]

Idk, reminds me of that shooting at a boxing match at a hotel in Dublin where some gangbangers went in and shot up the place dressed like girls. Seems like a useful way for criminals to distort the narrative or focus of their actions if they hide behind some social or political cause. The photo shows a regular guy just wearing girls clothes. I mean he's henched, bedecked in tatts like he just threw on a disguise staying fuck it anyway.

Pawtucket shooter’s gender identity tied to past family disputes, court records show​