Elections Clinton vs Trump Polls thread (Clinton's Bounce Larger than Trump's)

[jetstation]

After the debates and Trump brings up all the criminal evidence against hitlery if people are still for her they are brain dead.......................wait people reelected obama.......................yep brain dead.

 

[TheStruggle]

After the debates and Trump brings up all the criminal evidence against hitlery if people are still for her they are brain dead.......................wait people reelected obama.......................yep brain dead.

People gave Obama and Bush 8 years....think about that

 

[Madmick]

The AV is posted to to piss off marks like you proved I given up before my states primary in which I can't even vote for Trump because i'm not a republican...great logic...stick to the poll of the week.

Doesn't feel like a sufficient excuse. You can register. You and Hendo should make babies.

 

[Skip Reming]

He's talking about historical peaks and averages throughout the campaign. Trump is the most disliked candidate in history by a huge margin.

no he is not
him and hillary are the two most disliked candidates with trump currently being more disliked

Come on Islamic terrorists, send us over the edge with more terrorism

Poll: Trump, Clinton score historic unfavorable ratings
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/22/politics/2016-election-poll-donald-trump-hillary-clinton/

 

[Madmick]

no he is not
him and hillary are the two most disliked candidate with trump currently being more disliked

Come on Islamic terrorists, send us over the edge with more terrorism

Yes, yes he is. Try reading my post again and understanding it this time. Your response clearly indicates a failure of comprehension.

 

[Madmick]

no he is not
him and hillary are the two most disliked candidates with trump currently being more disliked

Come on Islamic terrorists, send us over the edge with more terrorism

Poll: Trump, Clinton score historic unfavorable ratings
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/22/politics/2016-election-poll-donald-trump-hillary-clinton/

Jesus Christ, even in this single poll (which is neither a trend, an average, a peak average, nor an average of polls) has Trump with a unfavorability rating 5 points greater than Clinton within their respective parties. His favorability rating is 7 points lower. Ergo, his spread is a massive 12 points greater.

Post more sources that you yourself don't read.


#Trumpsupporters

 

[Skip Reming]

Yes, yes he is. Try reading my post again and understanding it this time. Your response clearly indicates a failure of comprehension.

Point me to your quote that is relevant.
This is what I am seeing
"He's talking about historical peaks and averages throughout the campaign. Trump is the most disliked candidate in history by a huge margin."
If this is it, it is not that I am not understanding what you are posting, it is that you are wrong and I am proving it.

Poll: Trump, Clinton score historic unfavorable ratings
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/22/politics/2016-election-poll-donald-trump-hillary-clinton/

On the Republican side, Trump scores a net negative of -33, with a favorable rating of 24% compared to 57% of voters who view him unfavorably. On the Democratic side, Clinton fares only slightly better with a net negative of -21, registering a 31% favorable rating and a 52% unfavorable rating, according to the poll.
Both candidates' negatives far outweigh front-runners of the past.


Now where is your evidence contrary to this???



oh and PS
An NBC News/Survey Monkey poll released on Tuesday shows Clinton with a thin lead over Trump, 48 percent to 45 percent. Clinton had a lead of five percentage points over Trump in the same poll a week ago.
Here are some key demographic breakdowns in the poll:

Clinton wallops Trump among blacks and Hispanics, with leads of 84 percent to 9 percent and 65 percent to 28 percent, respectively.
Trump leads Clinton among white voters, 53 percent to 39 percent.
Clinton beats Trump among women by 15 points, while Trump beats Clinton among men by 11 points.
Independents support Trump 44 percent to 36 percent, while moderates support Clinton 53 percent to 39 percent.
While voters who identify as conservatives are strong for Trump, voters who identify as "very conservative" aren't as solid in their support for the businessman.

The survey was taken online from May 9–May 15 and the respondents consisted of 14,100 adults, 12,507 of whom are registered voters.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/5798/poll-just-how-close-trump-overtaking-hillary-aaron-bandler

 

[Madmick]

Point me to your quote that is relevant.
This is what I am seeing
"He's talking about historical peaks and averages throughout the campaign. Trump is the most disliked candidate in history by a huge margin."
If this is it, it is not that I am not understanding what you are posting, it is that you are wrong and I am proving it.

That didn't take long.

Do you need me to explain the mechanics of this tense to you the same way I have to explain to you what your own sources say?

Furthermore, that tense isn't even required for that statement to be accurate. Again, read your sources.

 

[Skip Reming]

Jesus Christ, even in this single poll (which is neither a trend, an average, a peak average, nor an average of polls) has Trump with a unfavorability rating 5 points greater than Clinton within their respective parties. His favorability rating is the counterbalance.

Post more sources that you yourself don't read.


#Trumpsupporters

"He's talking about historical peaks and averages throughout the campaign. Trump is the most disliked candidate in history by a huge margin."

"a unfavorability rating 5 points greater than Clinton"

Trump is the most disliked candidate in history by a huge margin

Trump is the most disliked candidate in history by a huge margin

Trump is the most disliked candidate in history by a huge margin

Instead of being worried about me reading or not, be concerned about what "huge margin" means
PS - I read what I post unlike some people....

 

[Skip Reming]

That didn't take long.

Do you need me to explain the mechanics of this tense to you the same way I have to explain to you what your own sources say?

"Trump is the most disliked candidate in history by a huge margin."

This is what you said. This is what I was responding to.

"He's talking about historical peaks and averages throughout the campaign."
- This is what someone else said which you mentioned, which I was not responding to

 

[TheStruggle]

Doesn't feel like a sufficient excuse. You can register. You and Hendo should make babies.

Beauty of being an registered independent, I don't have to buy into a party's BS

 

[Madmick]

"He's talking about historical peaks and averages throughout the campaign. Trump is the most disliked candidate in history by a huge margin."

"a unfavorability rating 5 points greater than Clinton"

Trump is the most disliked candidate in history by a huge margin

Trump is the most disliked candidate in history by a huge margin

Trump is the most disliked candidate in history by a huge margin

Instead of being worried about me reading or not, be concerned about what "huge margin" means
PS - I read what I post unlike some people....

Irrefutably, he is. Especially when you measure the averages of these peaks across the campaign and across polls rather than cherry picking Trump when he is at his strongest and Hillary when he is at her lowest. Furthermore, I'm not sure if you have the education in math to appreciate the proportion of these numbers and their deviations.

Beauty of being an registered independent, I don't have to buy into a party's BS

No, you merely lack the tools to wield skepticism of Trump's B.S.

Unattachment isn't a victory unto itself.

 

[HunterSdVa29]

absolutely lost it at MadMick calling ol dude Terrence Howard, good lawd

 

[Skip Reming]

Irrefutably, he is.

If you could just post some proof of this. My source is REAL and it is CNN which is about the biggest clinton nuthugger there is. If THEY are saying that clinton is almost as unlikeable as trump then I would say they would tend to be more on the optimistic side for Hillary.

Hillary's likeability can only go DOWN as we enter into a general election. Trump will bring up all the dirt and then some. We have seen Trump's dirt for decades.

These two are the most disliked for sure.

I am sorry, it is just me but I like FACTS not FEELINGS . . . I know in WR of all places ffs

 

[TheStruggle]

No, you merely lack the tools to wield skepticism of Trump's B.S.

Unattachment isn't a victory unto itself.

Maybe you should be asking yourself despite the Trump being a used car saleman why people would STILL rather vote for him over Hillary? If Trump is such a crook why is Clinton losing so much ground so fast while Sanders remains in DD? Because people would still rather vote for a wildcard in Trump than a lying globalist that is Hillary.

 

[Madmick]

Maybe you should be asking yourself despite the Trump being a used car saleman why people would STILL rather vote for him over Hillary? If Trump is such a crook why is Clinton losing so much ground so fast while Sanders remains in DD? Because people would still rather vote for a wildcard in Trump than a lying globalist that is Hillary.

This is exactly what I'm talking about. Trump is a "lying globalist". He has outsourced jobs and manufacturing. He owns multiple real estate properties (or holds licensing) across the globe. Not only does he lie, but he lies to cover up the lies of his subordinates AFTER there has already been proof of the lie disseminated.

The very criticism you Trump supporters wield against everybody -- not just Clinton-- can damn near uniformly be turned right back around and land flush on the chin of Trump. Yet you think you are of the caliber to criticize the critical thinking ability of those who disagree with you.

How do you think someone like me regards you?

 

[HunterSdVa29]

Trump literally sued Bill Maher for slander, over remarks that Trump's dad was really an orangutan, due to hair color similarities.

As in, TRUMP BROUGHT TO COURT, A LAWSUIT ABOUT SOMEONE SAYING IN JEST THAT HIS DAD WAS AN APE.

like, he legit felt the need to dispel that rumor hahahaha

WOW

 

[TheStruggle]

This is exactly what I'm talking about. Trump is a "lying globalist". He has outsourced jobs and manufacturing. He owns multiple real estate properties (or holds licensing) across the globe. Not only does he lie, but he lies to cover up the lies of his subordinates AFTER there has already been proof of the lie disseminated.

The very criticism you Trump supporters wield against everybody -- not just Clinton-- can damn near uniformly be turned right back around and land flush on the chin of Trump. Yet you think you are of the caliber to criticize the critical thinking ability of those who disagree with you.

How do you think someone like me regards you?

Ok let's say this is the case and Trump and Clinton are both globalists. Why are known globalists on both sides spending so much time and money to discredit him and his 'seemly' nationalist views? I mean if they are both on the same side then this should be a layup for the globalist agenda no matter who win. Wouldn't a smarter play be to make him look as bad as possible to make Clinton look like a slam dunk candidate....oh that's right they have already done that and failed. Keeping in mind it was cocky Clinton supporters who WANTED Trump to win because in their eyes Trump had no shot against Hillary. Now they are seeing that isn't the case and they are freaking the fuck out. Everyone expected Trump to get this far, but the more people on the left attacked his campaign with 24/7 news coverage the most popular he got. Now trump has become a fire that they can't contain. If Republicans wanted someone in the Globalist pocket as their candidate they would have had Jed Bush or Rubio like they planned, instead their own base rejected another Bush vs Clinton showdown and went with the populist candidate to isn't in the bed with the agenda and that's why they are freaking out, Clinton has now become their last hope and she's isn't that much more likely than Trump.

 

[Madmick]

Ok let's say this is the case and Trump and Clinton are both globalists. Why are known globalists on both sides spending so much time and money to discredit him and his 'seemly' nationalist views? I mean if they are both on the same side then this should be a layup for the globalist agenda no matter who win. Wouldn't a smarter play be to make him look as bad as possible to make Clinton look like a slam dunk candidate....oh that's right they have already done that and failed. Keeping in mind it was cocky Clinton supporters who WANTED Trump to win because in their eyes Trump had no shot against Hillary. Now they are seeing that isn't the case and they are freaking the fuck out. Everyone expected Trump to get this far, but the more people on the left attacked his campaign with 24/7 news coverage the most popular he got. Now trump has become a fire that they can't contain. If Republicans wanted someone in the Globalist pocket as their candidate they would have had Jed Bush or Rubio like they planned, instead their own base rejected another Bush vs Clinton showdown and went with the populist candidate to isn't in the bed with the agenda and that's why they are freaking out, Clinton has now become their last hope and she's isn't that much more likely than Trump.

This is a perfect example of why you and I don't think alike. You're hammering out your logic via your impressions of public political theater and the soap opera of MSM headlines-- which is quite ironic.

First, tt's not just globalists that are trying to stop him. Second, globalists aren't opposed only to him. Third, it's not terribly surprising that people who have business interests overseas, such as many in the GOP, as well as a vast number of economists (especially the majority of conservative economists who are merely economists and not necessarily part of the "establishment" or the 1%) express a concern when somebody goes around declaring radical tariffs and other protectionist policies that could potentially disrupt trade. You're not interested in even attempting to disentangle genuine concern for social economic interest with the faux concern of self-interested greed. Oh yeah, and fourth, he got owned in a debate by Rand Paul who exposed that he hadn't even read the TPP. Perhaps this is a valid reason to serious people to judge that Trump isn't a serious administrator and doesn't take them seriously.

How about we address the reality like sober adults that is really underlying this aspect of the Trump cult. You're terrified of China, but you don't seem capable of confronting the reality that vindictive trade policies won't make their industrial rise as a rival superpower go away simply because we flop around on the ground and throw a tantrum or close our eyes while whispering to ourselves, "Monsters aren't real". The underlying fundamentals of their economy and rise to power don't simply evaporate because we decide we don't like that-- unchecked, as the sum of millions of free individual consumer decisions-- we spend more on their stuff than they spend on our stuff.

Also, nobody expected Trump to get this far but those in his personality cult. Nobody esteemed was calling Trump when he rolled down that escalator. Nobody. You just invent and revise at will. Hell, you guys were just sweating just several weeks ago he would get "screwed" by a brokered convention.

 

[TeTe]

I love it, CNN just ran a breaking news story

The headline reads: Clinton: Trump not qualified to be president

Lol, wtf?