- Joined
- May 8, 2011
- Messages
- 45,741
- Reaction score
- 21,275
strikes to the back of the head are not any more dangerous than any other head strikes. they also are completely legal, so long as you don’t hit it on purpose, i guess?
this is complete bullshit lol hitting the neck is legal btwThe primary reason for the rule is the risk of paralyzing injury. Just a few punches to the head or neck can cause deterioration of motor skills and paralysis. It can also cause serious spinal cord injury, and even detach the brain from the brain stem, which is fatal.
Prichard Colon (Former boxer) would like to have a word with you on that subject, im not sure he can tho.I thought the back of the head being dangerous has been debunked?
this is complete bullshit lol hitting the neck is legal btw
prichard suffered a brain bleed, which happens to fighters all the time. he ate hundreds of legal punches in that fight, the dozen or so rabbit punches didn’t cause a brain bleed. also pretty telling that in the millions of boxing matches, TMA comps, MMA fights, etc. this is the only “example” of rabbit strikes being uniquely dangerous, despite not damaging prichard’s brain stem at all.Prichard Colon (Former boxer) would like to have a word with you on that subject, im not sure he can tho.
damaging the spine is only illegal in some scenarios, which means it should just be legal. if you get cro cop’d in the neck, it’s completely legal, and could just as easily paralyze you.Isnt that the spine? Which is illegal.
It's because he lacks restraint when he sees the guy's hurt. It's like all technique and logical go straight out the window. He needs to work on that shit for sure, control himself.He does this every fight. A lot of his shots are dangerously close to the back of the head or on the back of the head. Sometimes the ref calls it, maybe not so much in his home country. Either way tired of seeing it go un-challenged. Its part of his repertoire where he actually goes after the vulnerable parts of the head
![]()
![]()
![]()
The primary reason for the rule is the risk of paralyzing injury. Just a few punches to the head or neck can cause deterioration of motor skills and paralysis. It can also cause serious spinal cord injury, and even detach the brain from the brain stem, which is fatal.
![]()
Gane seems like kind of a dumbass and just keeps doing it.
Not his fault his opponents have to turn and duck tail when he’s whipping their ass. Notice a common theme, every time that back of the head nonsense is called is when Gane has his opponent badly hurt and they’re force to turn away from his striking.
Not his fault his opponents have to turn and duck tail when he’s whipping their ass. Notice a common theme, every time that back of the head nonsense is called is when Gane has his opponent badly hurt and they’re force to turn away from his striking.
Guys want knees anywhere and soccer kicks to the cranium but are worried about the back of the head. Let them whateverI thought the back of the head being dangerous has been debunked?
quote where I said that.This is an incredibly bad take. Someone’s injured so makes it ok to hit to the back of the head? It’s worse if anything.
+JDS but Gane was never aiming for
Shut your ass up, you no microwave having flute tootin' hippie.That JDS shot was 100% legal.
Shut your ass up, you no microwave having flute tootin' hippie.
My hemorrhoids wouldn't allow it.Im still right you "taking corn the long way" cajun poofter lol.