Circling The Arguments (SCO thread v. 32)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Uhhh....

The birth certificate you saw the actual certificate not someone's summary of the certificate that the summary writer had 0 involvement in.

Those two are nothing alike . This isn't even apples to oranges comparison you're making . It's apples to planets

The birth certificate I saw could have been fake though!

hqdefault.jpg
 
"Russia, if you are listening, I hope you are able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily [by our press] I'd love to see them."

Trump has trained you marmots to yell "No collusion!" as if that's the end of the discussion-- just ignoring the fact that Russia clearly helped him, and he clearly had no problem accepting Russia's help.

From OP:
The Barr summary concludes that, although the Russian government stole intelligence in order to interfere with the election, and reached out to members of the Trump campaign, the Trump campaign did not assist the Russian government in that interference-it merely reaped the benefits of it. Per Barr's analysis, this passive acceptance stops short of collusion.

Thats a pretty important qualifyer in Trumps remarks that you just dropped.

Not that you would leave it out on purpose
 
Just answer the tl/dr version: What's wrong with waiting for the contents of the Mueller report to be made available, before forming an opinion?

You clearly haven't.

Your opinion on the matter is clear.
 
You clearly haven't.

Your opinion on the matter is clear.

What a stupid rebuttal.

That's all you can offer in support of Barr withholding the report? People who want to see it and make up their own minds, THEY are biased?

You're on welfare, so you've got the time to put together a smarter post than this.
 
What a stupid rebuttal.

That's all you can offer in support of Barr withholding the report? People who want to see it and make up their own minds, THEY are biased?

You're on welfare, so you've got the time to put together a smarter post than this.

You're stating that people need to wait for the full release of the Mueller report before they form an opinion, meanwhile you have quite clearly already formed an opinion before the release of the Mueller report.

At least you tried...
 
You're stating that people need to wait for the full release of the Mueller report before they form an opinion, meanwhile you have quite clearly already formed an opinion before the release of the Mueller report.

I've displayed skepticism of Barr's summary when I don't have the document he's basing it on available to read. So that's "coming to a conclusion" to you?

Christ boy, you can't obfuscate the clear difference in our arguments: I want the report available for the public; you don't. You're really gonna try and spin that into me having formed the same type of opinion as you?

Think your argument through a bit more, cause it ain't clever.
 
I've displayed skepticism of Barr's summary when I don't have the document he's basing it on available to read. So that's "coming to a conclusion" to you?

Christ boy, you can't obfuscate the clear difference in our arguments: I want the report available for the public; you don't. You're really gonna try and spin that into me having formed the same type of opinion as you?

Think your argument through a bit more, cause it ain't clever.


Are you also skeptical of Rosenstiens assessment? How about the office of legal council?

You all know these other parties were consulted when reaching the decision, yet, constantly, I only see it framed as “Barr’s decision”.
 
ROFL, you are one single MSNBC talking point after another. You railed for months that Manafort alone was proof of collusion and the whole show was all over. Now, that you're standing there with egg on your face you've taken up MSNBC's very own new talking point, that none of this actually mattered and that collusion could never have been proven. It's sad to watch.

Secondly, no your second paragraph is so totally wrong and filled with TDS that it is, again, sad. Nothing Manafort was found guilty of had anything to with attempting to collude with Russia to influence the election, and that is specifically what the investigation was about. That specifically and nothing else. Stop trying to move the goal posts.
Ha no.

I don't even get MSNBC in Canada. I've seen the odd youtube clip when people link them here but that is it. You sound like Fox and Friends reel.

My position was and still is that Mueller did establish the core of his mandate which was 1) did Russia interfere with the US election (yes) and 2) was there 'coordination' and 'links' (ie collusion) between the Trump Campaign and Russia (also yes). That was proven with Manafort giving the Russians the polling data.

So I have no clue what you are talking about as I still rub it in everyday here that I was right.
 
Ha no.

I don't even get MSNBC in Canada. I've seen the odd youtube clip when people link them here but that is it. You sound like Fox and Friends reel.

My position was and still is that Mueller did establish the core of his mandate which was 1) did Russia interfere with the US election (yes) and 2) was there 'coordination' and 'links' (ie collusion) between the Trump Campaign and Russia (also yes). That was proven with Manafort giving the Russians the polling data.

So I have no clue what you are talking about as I still rub it in everyday here that I was right.



<36>


<TrumpWrong1>
 
BREAKING: The (allegedly) juciest page from Barr's redacted report has just leaked:
Aclu-v-ashcroft-redacted.jpg
 
Are you also skeptical of Rosenstiens assessment? How about the office of legal council?

You all know these other parties were consulted when reaching the decision, yet, constantly, I only see it framed as “Barr’s decision”.

Because it is undoubtedly Barr's decision to withhold the release of the report. And no, I don't particularly care about anyone else's assessment either, when the alternative could be me reading it for myself.
 
Because it is undoubtedly Barr's decision to withhold the release of the report. And no, I don't particularly care about anyone else's assessment either, when the alternative could be me reading it for myself.


Are you insinuating that Rosenstien would sit by quietly if Barr was burying something huge?

How about Meuller?


In reality, you want to see it because you’re desperate to find a single talking point to save you from the last two years in which you’ve embarrassed yourself.
 
Are you insinuating that Rosenstien would sit by quietly if Barr was burying something huge?

How about Meuller?

Don't know until I read it bob. How hard is this to get through that russian skull of yours?

In reality, you want to see it because you’re desperate to find a single talking point to save you from the last two years in which you’ve embarrassed yourself.

You keep projecting this we won / they lost narrative which only partisans like you give a shit about. No one except for an idiot would consider indictments for virtually all the trump campaign staff and half the trump WH as a win anyway. But I get it, you've moved the goal post so far, as to now pretend that personal jail time for trump, is the only thing you care about or predicted. No one on the other side had such a simplistic view, and no amount a spiking the football via gifs you've used for the millionth time is gonna change that.

I just want transparency. A concept utterly unimaginable to a trump supporter.
 
Don't know until I read it bob. How hard is this to get through that russian skull of yours?



You keep projecting this we won / they lost narrative which only partisans like you give a shit about. No one except for an idiot would consider indictments for virtually all the trump campaign staff and half the trump WH as a win anyway. But I get it, you've moved the goal post so far, as to now pretend that personal jail time for trump, is the only thing you care about or predicted. No one on the other side had such a simplistic view, and no amount a spiking the football via gifs you've used for the millionth time is gonna change that.

I just want transparency. A concept utterly unimaginable to a trump supporter.



This is politics.

The only thing that mattered was if they got Trump.

They didn’t. The right won. The left handed trump his biggest weapon in 2020.


Personally, I’m loving the salt coming from the left. This couldn’t go on long enough for me...
 
You're stating that people need to wait for the full release of the Mueller report before they form an opinion, meanwhile you have quite clearly already formed an opinion before the release of the Mueller report.

At least you tried...

You guys have been patting yourselves on the backs about a 4 page summary of a 300 plus page report produced by a Bush era hack put into place by our president based upon his previous views of executive power.

Talk about forming your opinion.
 
This is politics.

The only thing that mattered was if they got Trump.

They didn’t. The right won. The left handed trump his biggest weapon in 2020.


Personally, I’m loving the salt coming from the left. This couldn’t go on long enough for me...

What do you think of the myriad investigations into Trump and his businesses conducted by numerous states and prosecutors?

Aside from "Process crimes, it aint nothin, a fine and he walks"
 
You guys have been patting yourselves on the backs about a 4 page summary of a 300 plus page report produced by a Bush era hack put into place by our president based upon his previous views of executive power.

Talk about forming your opinion.


You can pat yourself on the back when you’ve been right since day one.

<seedat>
 
I just want transparency. A concept utterly unimaginable to a trump supporter.

And hypocrisy keeps on keeping on. It was the Republicans in 2012 that complained constantly the the Obummer administration was the least transparent and shit needed changing. It was one of Trump selling points, he tells it like it is or how it’s made up in his mind.

It’s simply unAmerican to not want to see the report. Remember, these motherfuckers are civil servants not Kings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top