Circling The Arguments (SCO thread v. 32)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mcountry said:
oh jesus christ are we still on this?
Click to expand...

Some of us want to see the content of the memo and aren't content with incomplete summaries and a lack of disclosure.

We understand that this isn't important to you, so long as some talking head has given you a partisan summary.

The question is, why are you upset with others wanted transparency?
 
Darkballs said:
Some of us want to see the content of the memo and aren't content with incomplete summaries and a lack of disclosure.

We understand that this isn't important to you, so long as some talking head has given you a partisan summary.

The question is, why are you upset with others wanted transparency?
Click to expand...

By all means. Stress on this for another 6 years like whoopi.
 
Mcountry said:
By all means. Stress on this for another 6 years like whoopi.
Click to expand...

Do you honestly get through life with nothing but strawman arguments?

I'm just asking if there are any actual examples in this thread of Dems "completely losing their shit." Cuckgeese managed to find one post where someone said he would "wait and see" in regards to an opinion on Mueller, and one Vice article. Do you have anything to add or is that it?
 
Darkballs said:
Do you honestly get through life with nothing but strawman arguments?

I'm just asking if there are any actual examples in this thread of Dems "completely losing their shit." Cuckgeese managed to find one post where someone said he would "wait and see" in regards to an opinion on Mueller, and one Vice article. Do you have anything to add or is that it?
Click to expand...

At this point its a done issue. Remember the birth certificate shit? This is done like that is.

Only in america do we have people upset that their president didnt collude with russia...
 
Darkballs said:
Some of us want to see the content of the memo and aren't content with incomplete summaries and a lack of disclosure.

We understand that this isn't important to you, so long as some talking head has given you a partisan summary.

The question is, why are you upset with others wanted transparency?
Click to expand...

Darkballs said:
Do you honestly get through life with nothing but strawman arguments?

I'm just asking if there are any actual examples in this thread of Dems "completely losing their shit." Cuckgeese managed to find one post where someone said he would "wait and see" in regards to an opinion on Mueller, and one Vice article. Do you have anything to add or is that it?
Click to expand...


It seems you’ve moved right along to the bargaining stage...


<{Heymansnicker}>
 
bobgeese said:
It seems you’ve moved right along to the bargaining stage...


<{Heymansnicker}>
Click to expand...
Do you have this stuff on a copy/paste word doc?

I do this shit with customers for work all the time but I keep seeing this with you and just wondering...does it translate?
 
bobgeese said:
{<jimmies}
Click to expand...
lol...I raise you effort + the suspicion you don't know how to use the internet proper.

tumblr_mljexsjDWC1r6r6k3o1_1280.gif
 
andnowweknow said:
lol...I raise you effort + the suspicion you don't know how to use the internet proper.

tumblr_mljexsjDWC1r6r6k3o1_1280.gif
Click to expand...



It seems you don’t know how to use the English language properly...


Also, you’ve embarrassed yourself for 2 years straight. Don’t be surprised when you get shit on by the folks who’ve been right since day one.


<seedat>
 
bobgeese said:
It seems you don’t know how to use the English language properly...


Also, you’ve embarrassed yourself for 2 years straight. Don’t be surprised when you get shit on by the folks who’ve been right since day one.


<seedat>
Click to expand...
You are playing yourself Bob. I love you still.
 
You know when I'll be worried for Trump?

When @andnowweknow is right about anything regarding his Presidential term.

As of now...

<13>
 
Mcountry said:
At this point its a done issue.
Click to expand...

And that's the difference between trump supporters and the rest of us in this thread. The only thing you cared about was whether or not trump, personally, would be injured. So by only have a statement that he won't be charged, you're satisfied.

I want to see the contents of a two-year investigation that our tax dollars funded, although we've netted a profit from Manafort seizures alone. This investigation resulted in several dozen guilty pleas, indictments and prison terms for senior trump WH/campaign staff, and that explicitly states that it does not exonerate the president for charges of obstruction. How can you not be interested in the actual reports contents, if you care about this story, and not just trump?

So, no, I'm not moved by Barr (who wrote unsolicited memos about how a sitting president can never be indicted) concluding, without showing us the document he's basing this on, that the president can't be indicted here.

And that's the difference. I want transparency, and you don't. And you don't because the only thing you care about is trump personally. And that's weird.

Just answer the tl/dr version: What's wrong with waiting for the contents of the Mueller report to be made available, before forming an opinion?
 
Last edited:
Darkballs said:
And that's the difference between trump supporters and the rest of us in this thread. The only thing you cared about was whether or not trump, personally, would be injured. So by only have a statement that he won't be charged, you're satisfied.

I want to see the contents of a two-year investigation that our tax dollars funded, although we've netted a profit from Manafort seizures alone. This investigation resulted in several dozen guilty pleas, indictments and prison terms for senior trump WH/campaign staff, and that explicitly states that it does not exonerate the president for charges of obstruction. How can you not be interested in the actual reports contents, if you care about this story, and not just trump?

So, no, I'm not moved by Barr (who wrote unsolicited memos about how a sitting president can never be indicted) concluding, without showing us the document he's basing this on, that the president can't be indicted here.

And that's the difference. I want transparency, and you don't. And you don't because the only thing you care about is trump personally. And that's weird.

Just answer the tl/dr version: What's wrong with waiting for the contents of the Mueller report to be made available, before forming an opinion?
Click to expand...



TLDR answer, because the AG has the final say. Nobody is going to take the house seriously, they’ve been yelling impeachment since day 1. If they had not, perhaps they would get some traction, but they’ve created so much noise, it will be nearly impossible to get out a message that’s taken seriously. Especially considering the republicans can simply point to the AG, who consulted Rosenstien and the OLC to form their decision.

Btw, I have no problem with the report being released, as long as they follow the rules (such as the courts recent decision to not release grand jury info). Now, don’t get me wrong, I’d laugh my ass off if they just tucked it away and we got another year of liberals screeching about it, but alas, that’s a pipe dream...
 
Darkballs said:
And that's the difference between trump supporters and the rest of us in this thread. The only thing you cared about was whether or not trump, personally, would be injured. So by only have a statement that he won't be charged, you're satisfied.

I want to see the contents of a two-year investigation that our tax dollars funded, although we've netted a profit from Manafort seizures alone. This investigation resulted in several dozen guilty pleas, indictments and prison terms for senior trump WH/campaign staff, and that explicitly states that it does not exonerate the president for charges of obstruction. How can you not be interested in the actual reports contents, if you care about this story, and not just trump?

So, no, I'm not moved by Barr (who wrote unsolicited memos about how a sitting president can never be indicted) concluding, without showing us the document he's basing this on, that the president can't be indicted here.

And that's the difference. I want transparency, and you don't. And you don't because the only thing you care about is trump personally. And that's weird.

Just answer the tl/dr version: What's wrong with waiting for the contents of the Mueller report to be made available, before forming an opinion?
Click to expand...

Dude you got duped by cnn. It was a bullshit made up story that you hoped came true if you said it enough times.

Its over. Move on to the next trump outrage plez
 
Mcountry said:
At this point its a done issue. Remember the birth certificate shit? This is done like that is.

Only in america do we have people upset that their president didnt collude with russia...
Click to expand...
Uhhh....

The birth certificate you saw the actual certificate not someone's summary of the certificate that the summary writer had 0 involvement in.

Those two are nothing alike . This isn't even apples to oranges comparison you're making . It's apples to planets
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,941
Messages
58,329,490
Members
176,000
Latest member
Markooz86

Share this page

Back
Top