Circling The Arguments (SCO thread v. 32)

[SBJJ]

lol. that is so wrong and dumb.

First off he was not found 'not guilty' as that means there was a trial.

Second if your statement is true that means anyone that cannot be charged at the time of investigation is never found guilty later. it is fact that charges not being brought now does not establish the person is cleared or innocent based on some people being charged and found guilty subsequently.

There was a grand jury here bubba

You really got to stop calling other posters stupid.

 

[waiguoren]

right but the context of Mueller's comment is still extraordinarily meaningful.

"If the special counsel's office had been certain that Trump did not commit crimes, Mueller said, it would have said so in the report."

the attempts to strip that context and reduce this to contextless phrase are deliberate and obvious.

Think about what you are writing. There is literally no presidential campaign, historical or current, in which a responsible prosecutor (or any person) could say "I am certain that the head of the campaign committed no crimes!" That would be reckless and irresponsible.

 

[SBJJ]

Lol at Forum Idiot Mike being reduced to....."He might be found guilty later"