Circling The Arguments (SCO thread v. 32)

[waiguoren]

I haven't been in here in a while. Have the "Barr is covering up Mueller's findings" conspiracy theorists moved the goalposts yet?

 

[MikeMcMann]

Jesus Christ, you’re comparing the AG,Rosenstien,and the OLC decision that there is not enough evidence to bring an ooj charge, to a Rachael Maddow opinion.


Please do us a favor and fuck off.

once again your stupidity and inability to comprehend reveals itself.

the point, that went over your head, is there is differences between someone's, ANYONE'S, opinion on the Mueller report and the actual agency that has a Constitutional obligation to be a check and balance and provide oversight to the POTUS.

You do not understand that. What you do not understand is whether it is Mitch McConnell or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or Steven Mnuchin or Bill Barr offering their their opinion on the Mueller Report or saying absolutely nothing it changes NOTHING on what Congress does next with that information. If they all offer an opinion it does nothing. If none of them offer an opinion it does nothing.

NOT ONE THING.

Congress will still continue with its oversight, and Congress will either push through forcing a potential Supreme Court challenge and that action by Congress and that ruling by Supreme Court will be the last word on this matter. Not what barr, McConnell or any one else thinks since they have no role in assessing the Mueller report and the actions taken with it.



(this is where you continue to show your stupidity and inability to understand the above)

 

[bobgeese]

once again your stupidity and inability to comprehend reveals itself.

the point, that went over your head, is there is differences between someone's, ANYONE'S, opinion on the Mueller report and the actual agency that has a Constitutional obligation to be a check and balance and provide oversight to the POTUS.

You do not understand that. What you do not understand is whether it is Mitch McConnell or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or Steven Mnuchin or Bill Barr offering their their opinion on the Mueller Report or saying absolutely nothing it changes NOTHING on what Congress does next with that information. If they all offer an opinion it does nothing. If none of them offer an opinion it does nothing.

NOT ONE THING.

Congress will still continue with its oversight, and Congress will either push through forcing a potential Supreme Court challenge and that action by Congress and that ruling by Supreme Court will be the last word on this matter. Not what barr, McConnell or any one else thinks since they have no role in assessing the Mueller report and the actions taken with it.



(this is where you continue to show your stupidity and inability to understand the above)

 

[Darkballs]

I haven't been in here in a while. Have the "Barr is covering up Mueller's findings" conspiracy theorists moved the goalposts yet?

You mean like starting with "They won't find anything," then after a record setting number of indictments and guilty pleas, move it to "Well trump won't personally see jail time?"

No. No one's done that. We would like to see the evidence that Barr is basing his decision on, while you applaud the lack of transparency.

 

[Strychnine]

Well, that's good. The Appropriate committees in the house are entitled to any taxpayer's taxes, and the head of the IRS is required to furnish them.

Real question - Do you think Trump's taxes from say, 2010 are still under audit like he claims? If not, why do you think he's hiding them?

Turns out that President Nixon released his taxes to the public while they were under audit.

"Turns out Richard Nixon publicly released his tax returns while they were under audit in 1973, at the height of the Watergate investigation. But Watergate wasn't the reason, according to tax historian Joe Thorndike. In the summer and fall of that year, "Nixon was engulfed by a controversy over his personal taxes."

https://money.cnn.com/2016/05/11/pf/taxes/nixon-trump-tax-returns/index.html

The "My taxes are under audit so I can't release them!" is a pathetic excuse.

 

[HereticBD]

once again your stupidity and inability to comprehend reveals itself.

Says this guy...

Mueller has ALREADY filed the collusion allegations.

You're a national disgrace, Mikey. Turn in your Maple Syrup.

 

[bobgeese]

You mean like starting with "They won't find anything," then after a record setting number of indictments and guilty pleas, move it to "Well trump won't personally see jail time?"

No. No one's done that. We would like to see the evidence that Barr is basing his decision on, while you applaud the lack of transparency.

^^^ bargaining stage

 

[waiguoren]

We would like to see the evidence that Barr is basing his decision on, while you applaud the lack of transparency.

Could you please quote the post of mine in which I "applauded the lack of transparency"?

 

[Darkballs]

Could you please quote the post of mine in which I "applauded the lack of transparency"?

By championing Barr's three-week and counting delay in releasing a report (that will be unnecessarily redacted; we can make a bet on that which you can lose then duck out of) that Congress has not just the right, but an obligation to see, you've done just that.

Reading between the lines here.

 

[waiguoren]

By championing Barr's three-week and counting delay in releasing a report (that will be unnecessarily redacted; we can make a bet on that which you can lose then duck out of) that Congress has not just the right, but an obligation to see, you've done just that.

Reading between the lines here.

None of this actually happened though.

 

[Darkballs]

None of this actually happened though.

You realize this isn't a PM, and everyone can see the history of your posts, right?

 

[waiguoren]

You realize this isn't a PM, and everyone can see the history of your posts, right?

Right.

 

[Darkballs]

Right.

Question: Why do you have that quote from Jack V as your sig? Is it because you made a bet with him after talking shit for months, lost the bet, and then went and hid until the time was over?

 

[JamesRussler]

Jesus this thread really died.

 

[waiguoren]

Question: Why do you have that quote from Jack V as your sig?

I placed the statement in my signature because I find it amusing.

@Jack V Savage wrote the imperative in my signature. His target was not me, but @Cubo de Sangre. If I recall correctly, in the relevant preceding exchange, Jack V Savage falsely accused Cubo de Sangre of claiming that Elizabeth Warren had claimed to be a "full-blooded Native American". When Jack V Savage was unable to produce evidence of that claim, he resorted to the ugly exhortation in my signature.

 

[unimackpass]

@Jack V Savage wrote the imperative in my signature. His target was not me, but @Cubo de Sangre. If I recall correctly, in the relevant preceding exchange, Jack V Savage falsely accused Cubo de Sangre of claiming that Elizabeth Warren had claimed to be a "full-blooded Native American". When Jack V Savage was unable to produce evidence of that claim, he resorted to the ugly exhortation in my signature.

I placed the statement in my signature because I find it amusing.

When @Jack V Savage is exposed as not being the smartest man in the room he usually resorts to such tactics.

 

[Jack V Savage]

I placed the statement in my signature because I find it amusing.

@Jack V Savage wrote the imperative in my signature. His target was not me, but @Cubo de Sangre. If I recall correctly, in the relevant preceding exchange, Jack V Savage falsely accused Cubo de Sangre of claiming that Elizabeth Warren had claimed to be a "full-blooded Native American". When Jack V Savage was unable to produce evidence of that claim, he resorted to the ugly exhortation in my signature.

Why do you insist on degrading yourself by telling ridiculous lies like that? Seems to be a compulsion.

Also appears that DB is right. You're so humiliated about your loss (and your subsequent inability to take the loss with dignity) that you're lashing out at me, telling obvious lies, etc. It's legitimately sad.

 

[Bobby 3 Sticks]

Every post you type tRUmp because why? You look gotten to and very biased so how do you expect anyone to care about your words?

Strange

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_Tower_meeting

His namesake couldn't wait to meet with people he thought were members of the Kremlin to get dirt on Hillary. His namesake showed more love for Russia than the US. Maybe if his namesake wasn't a bigger piece of shit than him, I wouldn't auto-correct trump to tRUmp

You look like a very biased tRUmp supporter.

 

[bobgeese]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_Tower_meeting

His namesake couldn't wait to meet with people he thought were members of the Kremlin to get dirt on Hillary. His namesake showed more love for Russia than the US. Maybe if his namesake wasn't a bigger piece of shit than him, I wouldn't auto-correct trump to tRUmp

You look like a very biased tRUmp supporter.

You realize team Hillary literally paid for Russian propaganda?

 

[Strychnine]

You realize team Hillary literally paid for Russian propaganda?

Gonna have her locked up any minute now...