- Joined
- Oct 27, 2019
- Messages
- 12,688
- Reaction score
- 15,277
That I don't take myself too seriously on a karate forum? That's right.Your handle tells me so much about you.
That I don't take myself too seriously on a karate forum? That's right.Your handle tells me so much about you.
No, and a tiny bit of research shows that we checked.
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-covid-19-not-human-made-lab-genetic-analysis-nature
The tiniest bit of effort to be informed. Literally anything beyond pure facebook as your news sourc .
https://www.gokunming.com/en/blog/item/4457/forest-fires-ignite-across-yunnanYes, these "science" websites are either Chinese bought, too PC(imagine if the virus came from a white country like Russia or god forbid Hungary) to be objective or straight up stupid.
Their logic goes like this:
1-The Virus is not a bioweapon
2-Hence it wasn't created on the Wuhan Institute of Virology(WIV)
3-Checkmate racists trump supporters
![]()
Now, the circumstantial evidence is that the virus comes from Yunnan bats. Yet the initial outbreak happened in Wuhan, 1,000 miles from Yunnan. Coincidentally there is the WIV in Wuhan that was studying Yunnan bats. They had people hunting bats, possibly getting infected in Yunnan and bringing it to Wuhan.
Richard H. Ebright is an American scientists that seems to have helped to establish the Wuhan laboratory, probably as a consultant.
I can't be sure it's him on twitter but take a look:
https://twitter.com/R_H_Ebright
Also, from wikipedia:
Class solidarity or did the Chinese buy him? I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt and it seems his scientist animus is taking over because he is now suspecting(and that's what scientists do, investigate and question) the WIV may be at fault.
Right now, nation states have developed the ability to destroy all life on Earth. Eventually, probably this century, technology will develop to the point that every individual has the ability to destroy the world. This is one potential solution to the Fermi Paradox. Anyways, what can you do then to prevent that?the gap between man & machine is getting smaller. or, it's already been accomplished - man has merged with machine & the public just has no knowledge of it yet (RE: Elon Musk's Neuralink etc.).
there's going to be a time in the future where computer/digital viruses will be able to infect living organisms.
cyborg or not - viruses will become that sophisticated.
it scares me yet at the same time it saddens me that this probably won't happen in our lifetime.
Right now, nation states have developed the ability to destroy all life on Earth. Eventually, probably this century, technology will develop to the point that every individual has the ability to destroy the world. This is one potential solution to the Fermi Paradox. Anyways, what can you do then to prevent that?
Seriously though, what can be done?the stupidity of mankind is limitless - it knows no bounds.
we can't do anything, but learn from our mistakes, & there always will be mistakes.
Seriously though, what can be done? I personally see only one way to deal with it.
You don't see any solutions? I can think of a few.I am serious though. nothing will/can be done because something terrible will happen/always happens. technology today doesn't advance - it evolves. it's almost like an organism. nothing is going to stop it. for all the good that technology does, it does far more harm because humans aren't perfect.
This guy did some nice research into the subject.https://www.foxnews.com/politics/co...pete-us-sources.amp?__twitter_impression=true
We shall see. Do you believe the original story, that it came from the wet markets? Or do you think that's a coverup story?
Reading between the line of this reporting it sounds like our government is firmly convinced that the virus escaped from their lab but that they are currently in a diplomatic posture, trying to get China to fess up and engage with the world before outright accusing it of anything.
'Come clean': US presses China on coronavirus after lab reports
You don't see any solutions? I can think of a few.
Do you really think so? The study author is quoted saying when they started 'it was clear almost overnight this was not manmade'. As for the 'probable', 'likely' wording etc that's just typical scientific writing, due to the epistemological underpinnings of science. We never actually prove anything, so arguably it isn't correct to use the verb to be without a modifier (e.g. 'likely') when describing study findings.I appreciate these stories, but IMO they are not conclusive at all. I am seeing phrases like "might have" and "they wouldn't have done it like that" and "it looks like it could be" and "unlikely" and shit like that. The article you post is swarming with them. It's just not good enough to draw a definitive conclusion. We don't know what goes on in that fucking lab!
Agreed actually. This kind of thing was looming on the horizon for years now. If anything, pandemics are going to be more common and not less common and it's not shocking information at all that this was cooked up in a lab. Biological warfare research is a thing.No, this isn't a conspiracy theory. It's valid and plausible.
The most likely scenario is that they found it, tried studying it, and inadvertently a scientist was infected and the infection spread to others in the lab, then the population as a whole.Agreed actually. This kind of thing was looming on the horizon for years now. If anything, pandemics are going to be more common and not less common and it's not shocking information at all that this was cooked up in a lab. Biological warfare research is a thing.
It was bound to go wrong someday. All of these experiments will.The most likely scenario is that they found it, tried studying it, and inadvertently a scientist was infected and the infection spread to others in the lab, then the population as a whole.
the real question after that becomes, if they weren’t studying viruses in that lab, would humans be in contact with the virus now? I believe we wouldn’t be dealing with it at all, as one of the early Chinese whistleblowers thought humans wouldn’t normally make contact with this disease
This is a scenario that CT nuts, anti government types and anti War machiners have been mewing about for decades.It was bound to go wrong someday. All of these experiments will.
I don’t think they are saying it was man made in a lab but experimented with in a lab without proper sanitization procedures that spread to wet market a few bocks away.No, and a tiny bit of research shows that we checked.
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-covid-19-not-human-made-lab-genetic-analysis-nature
The tiniest bit of effort to be informed. Literally anything beyond pure facebook as your news sourc .