- Joined
- Dec 3, 2012
- Messages
- 3,346
- Reaction score
- 1
[YT]RSLfTygI7AA[/YT]
If you ascribe to the out of Africa theory, then a non African person's lineage would be relatively short compared to an African's. It's believed that anatomically modern humans originated in East Africa's Rift Valley circa 200,000 years ago.doesn't everyone technically have lineage going back just as long :?
edit, never mind.If you ascribe to the out of Africa theory, then a non African person's lineage would be relatively short compared to an African's. It's believed that anatomically modern humans originated in East Africa's Rift Valley circa 200,000 years ago.
How big's his penis?
Just wondering, do you have something against Asians?
Well I don't believe that my ancestors were Somalians.
How big's his penis?
Why not? Do you have proof otherwise?
Just wondering, do you have something against Asians?
probably 5+
doesn't everyone technically have lineage going back just as long :?
Nope, but i highly doubt that the black guys just mutated into whites and asians.
Their mutation took place over tens of thousands of years as they adapted to the climate of Europe and Asia. Either way, we've all gotta come from the same species somewhere. How else are we still able to interbreed?
Why are Eskimos aren't white then? :wink: And Asia and Europe are not that different in climate in most places.
I think Africans might have interbred with Neanderthals in the west and with the "Hobbits"(Homo floresiensis) in the east. That is why we look different but still kind of the same.
So you think Asians, blacks, whites are all different human subspecies?
no and yes, their ancestors had sex with each other, so now we are one
For example, Homo floresiensis looks much more Asian (thai) than the African version of human.
no and yes, their ancestors had sex with each other, so now we are one
For example, Homo floresiensis looks much more Asian (thai) than the African version of human.