Can't ask Rousey about fighting lol

giphy.gif

c781b103de6673a0a52375043bbd8be6.gif

hqdefault.jpg


:)
 
Tier1 Operator said:
Cliffs please.........
Click to expand...

the video was 30 seconds long. But it's about an interviewer being warned by Honda's people that there was to be no questions about fighting, and if they try she will walk out of the interview.

Guess we can only ask her about hoadhouse.
 
What if you would ask her about losing.

losing doesn't have to necessarily be linked to fighting.
 
BVG said:
the video was 30 seconds long. But it's about an interviewer being warned by Honda's people that there was to be no questions about fighting, and if they try she will walk out of the interview.

Guess we can only ask her about hoadhouse.
Click to expand...
thanks
 
Holly completely broke this chick. First at the weigh-ins, then in the fight, and after the fight. Has one fighter ever been so thoroughly dismantled by another?
 
lol of course she doesnt.
and if she was still the champ, fighting would be the only thing she would talk about.
 
Well it seems like they kind of sandbagged her making the restrictions public anyway. Maybe she suspected a slam piece?

Although I do think it is silly to make fighting questions off limit. Would be better of just not being interviewed.
 
csroster said:
Seems a little sleazy to frame the story around her not wanting to talk about fighting. It's like the guy went along with it just to exploit her with it.
Click to expand...
Reporters do NOT like being told what to ask and not ask.
 
EGarrett said:
Reporters do NOT like being told what to ask and not ask.
Click to expand...
Real reporters would never make pre-interview criteria public. I have never seen a place do that before. And the question if she blames Australia was goofy. It seems like the Australian version of TMZ.

But again, I think it was silly of her to even do the interview under those conditions.
 
skombolis said:
Real reporters would never make pre-interview criteria public. I have never seen a place do that before. And the question if she blames Australia was goofy. It seems like the Australian version of TMZ.

But again, I think it was silly of her to even do the interview under those conditions.
Click to expand...
It's very common for reporters and interviews to air people out for trying to do this. They HATE it.
 
EGarrett said:
It's very common for reporters and interviews to air people out for trying to do this. They HATE it.
Click to expand...
That's not common at all, are you kidding? People would stop doing interviews with places that did that. Someone has restrictions because they normally don't want to give more press to a particular thing and tell a reporter it is off limits.

If the reporter than went ahead and told everyone it would defeat the purpose and it creates a worse situation than them at least being able to respond. Once in a while that information might leak from a source after-the-fact but it's very uncommon for any reporting agency to do that. It's as unprofessional as it gets.
 
skombolis said:
That's not common at all, are you kidding? People would stop doing interviews with places that did that. Someone has restrictions because they normally don't want to give more press to a particular thing and tell a reporter it is off limits.

If the reporter than went ahead and told everyone it would defeat the purpose and it creates a worse situation than them at least being able to respond. Once in a while that information might leak from a source but it's very uncommon for any reporting agency to do that. It's as unprofessional as it gets.
Click to expand...
Most people don't do interviews with "off limits" topics, so they don't care if they see a place do this. It's generally considered very douchey or disrespectful to an interviewer. Pretty much every interview show I've watched a lot, Fox News, CNN, hell, Opie and Anthony and The View, air people out for trying to do this.
 
skombolis said:
That's not common at all, are you kidding? People would stop doing interviews with places that did that. Someone has restrictions because they normally don't want to give more press to a particular thing and tell a reporter it is off limits.

If the reporter than went ahead and told everyone it would defeat the purpose and it creates a worse situation than them at least being able to respond. Once in a while that information might leak from a source after-the-fact but it's very uncommon for any reporting agency to do that. It's as unprofessional as it gets.
Click to expand...

it's actually reporting a fact and it's having ethical standards instead of bending to personal interests.
 
"Mentally toughest fighter ever!" - Dana

Breaks in 2 minutes, can't show her face, refuses to talk about it, dates a married guy to cope after trashing DNBs
 
last question he asked should have been about fighting just to see her walk away on camera.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,071
Messages
55,465,332
Members
174,785
Latest member
JoyceOuthw

Share this page

Back
Top