International Canadian Election Results Start to Come Through: 'The 51st State' Edition

[rearnakedchoke]

is that what you and your friends are telling yourselves? Also, nice AV. Did you lose a bet or something?

Haha. Did he lose the bet to you?

Harper
Scheer
O’Toole
Polievre

Honestly, if they ran Otoole again, they had a better shot of winning. He was the only smart one who saw that going maple maga chud was a bad idea.

 

[Andy Capp]

Yeah PEI is really pathetic, embarrassing really. Can't even provide for themselves. The men that want to work have to flee elsewhere like migrants from India or something, the rest are on welfare. Imagine looking at that chart and thinking Alberta will continue forever with such a parasitic relationship.

Cry some more. They can't hear you at Mar a Lago.

 

[Deleted member 592570]

is that what you and your friends are telling yourselves? Also, nice AV. Did you lose a bet or something?

Nope.

Carney is the fucking GOAT. Lulling Trump into a false sense of security by acting like a eunuch in his presence. Lord Varys style.

Little does Trump know GOAT Carney is the secret puppetmaster.

 

[Deleted member 592570]

No I said it's tertiary to young guys with lots of disposable income. Always has been. Give a 20 year old all that money 2 weeks on in fort 1 week off in Edmonton they find all sorts of interesting ways to spend it.

Do these young rig pigs pay homeless drug addicts to commit violent crimes? I'm not sure what you're getting at here.

What I've learned from living in some sketchy areas is that 90% of violent crime is the same handful of guys either doing it to each other or to their girlfriends.

Even notorious areas like Forest Lawn in Calgary are no big deal provided you aren't hanging out with that particular group of people.

 

[TUFNewb]

Do these young rig pigs pay homeless drug addicts to commit violent crimes? I'm not sure what you're getting at here.

What I've learned from living in some sketchy areas is that 90% of violent crime is the same handful of guys either doing it to each other or to their girlfriends.

Even notorious areas like Forest Lawn in Calgary are no big deal provided you aren't hanging out with that particular group of people.

No of course not. There is other factors at play and I did not intend to imply it was the only driver of crime, as I indicated...

The oil patch industry brings young, highly paid, transient men to Edmonton, who then contribute to demand for illicit stuff, which organized crime exploits and is empowered by, leading to tertiary crimes like theft and violence. Boom and bust cycle plus addiction plus a limited skill set for some of these workers, means some end up homeless themselves, likely committing crimes to support habits. They might not be working directly in oil, they might work in one of the countless secondary industries in Edmonton. Sometimes guys in these industries are very rough around the edges. I would go as far to say it attracts them to the city, some are basically homeless already or are like ex-cons only able to find work sweeping up a shop. Walk though an industrial area at night in Edmonton (or anywhere really), it can be sketchy. So now you have police busy dealing with some of this extra shit other cities don't have as much of, and less able to focus on keeping streets safe from prolific offenders (the guys you can't just avoid by being a law abiding citizen). Police are stretched super thin, sometimes you will go to a police station to report a crime and it is closed due to staff shortages, it's crazy. Because of the good job market Edmonton has had a huge population boom and police and other services have not been able to keep up. Calgary is bad too. So you can see it's all related, but sort of unavoidable. Traditionally heavy industrial activity brings economic opportunity but also big time social challenges to the surrounding community

 

[TUFNewb]

Cry some more. They can't hear you at Mar a Lago.

Bro's province tax and spent their way to Greece levels of GDP, but here he is crying about Smith spending 10k to cut a deal worth billions for Alberta. Ironic.

 

[Andy Capp]

Bro's province tax and spent their way to Greece levels of GDP, but here he is crying about Smith spending 10k to cut a deal worth billions for Alberta. Ironic.

 

[Lycandroid]

It hasn't even been two weeks and Carney has proved that his entire campaign was a lie.

The fiscal conservative just approved another 33 billion in spending through an order in council. This is with parliament still suspended, so this was just shoved through with no scrutiny whatsoever.

How are any of you okay with this ?

This is in addition to the 129 billion already going to be spent over the next 4 years.

Freeland resigned over a 66 billion dollar budget, yet this 33 billion is nothing to worry about.

Carney ran an entire campaign on standing up to Trump, elbows up. Instead he went ass up during the entire meeting.

Now it's coming out that Carney and Trump worked together on the anti Trump rhetoric to secure the election. Trump was pre warned that Carney would be running on an anti Trump campaign and in exchange for Trump not attacking Carney in retaliation Canada would come to the table after the election with a position favourable to Trump.

Mark Carney will be the catalyst to every fear Canadians have about being sold out to the US, becoming a reality.

 

[Deleted member 592570]

No of course not. There is other factors at play and I did not intend to imply it was the only driver of crime, as I indicated...

The oil patch industry brings young, highly paid, transient men to Edmonton, who then contribute to demand for illicit stuff, which organized crime exploits and is empowered by, leading to tertiary crimes like theft and violence. Boom and bust cycle plus addiction plus a limited skill set for some of these workers, means some end up homeless themselves, likely committing crimes to support habits. They might not be working directly in oil, they might work in one of the countless secondary industries in Edmonton. Sometimes guys in these industries are very rough around the edges. I would go as far to say it attracts them to the city, some are basically homeless already or are like ex-cons only able to find work sweeping up a shop. Walk though an industrial area at night in Edmonton (or anywhere really), it can be sketchy. So now you have police busy dealing with some of this extra shit other cities don't have as much of, and less able to focus on keeping streets safe from prolific offenders (the guys you can't just avoid by being a law abiding citizen). Police are stretched super thin, sometimes you will go to a police station to report a crime and it is closed due to staff shortages, it's crazy. Because of the good job market Edmonton has had a huge population boom and police and other services have not been able to keep up. Calgary is bad too. So you can see it's all related, but sort of unavoidable. Traditionally heavy industrial activity brings economic opportunity but also big time social challenges to the surrounding community

I mean that's just not even close to being the correct cause of the drug and crime problem in Edmonton. Homeless addicts and street people drive the drug trade, not rig workers coming into town to blow off steam every couple of weeks.

 

[Andy Capp]

It hasn't even been two weeks and Carney has proved that his entire campaign was a lie.

The fiscal conservative just approved another 33 billion in spending through an order in council. This is with parliament still suspended, so this was just shoved through with no scrutiny whatsoever.

How are any of you okay with this ?

This is in addition to the 129 billion already going to be spent over the next 4 years.

Freeland resigned over a 66 billion dollar budget, yet this 33 billion is nothing to worry about.

Carney ran an entire campaign on standing up to Trump, elbows up. Instead he went ass up during the entire meeting.

Now it's coming out that Carney and Trump worked together on the anti Trump rhetoric to secure the election. Trump was pre warned that Carney would be running on an anti Trump campaign and in exchange for Trump not attacking Carney in retaliation Canada would come to the table after the election with a position favourable to Trump.

Mark Carney will be the catalyst to every fear Canadians have about being sold out to the US, becoming a reality.

 

[AnGrYcRoW]

Seems to me Pierre lost because he didn't lie through his teeth and every opportunity like Carney did.

The Carney, strong leader who can save us from Trump narrative is already unraveling in the first week, it won't be long before Canadians realize he is Trudeau 2.0

Still coping I see , good luck with that.

 

[Lycandroid]

Still coping I see , good luck with that.

yet again all you retards have is high school banter

you should be the ones crying, you were treated like complete and utter fools by the Liberal campaign and you lapped it up like a dog, too stupid to even bother tasting what he was wolfing down.

Did any of you read up on the bank of Canada report on friday ? We are FUCKED.

 

[AnGrYcRoW]

yet again all you retards have is high school banter

you should be the ones crying, you were treated like complete and utter fools by the Liberal campaign and you lapped it up like a dog, too stupid to even bother tasting what he was wolfing down.

Did any of you read up on the bank of Canada report on friday ? We are FUCKED.

So the bank of Canada report would have been different if Polievre had won ?

 

[Lycandroid]

So the bank of Canada report would have been different if Polievre had won ?

No but he wouldn't be continuing the same policies that lead to such a damning report on our economic future.

He wouldn't have need to intentionally make the tariff situation worse to win an election.

This report details just how much damage the over spending and the tariffs are going to have on us.

The conservatives wanted to cut spending and strengthen our resource sector to offset damage done by tariffs, two things the Liberals refuse to do.

People voted in the Liberals actually believing they would do 180 on everything they have done in the last ten years, they only needed to keep this facade running for a few weeks in order to fool you guys. We are already back to business as usual.

 

[AnGrYcRoW]

Haha. Did he lose the bet to you?

Harper
Scheer
O’Toole
Polievre

Honestly, if they ran Otoole again, they had a better shot of winning. He was the only smart one who saw that going maple maga chud was a bad idea.

Scheer and polievre are swamp creatures, neither of them have ever had a real job outside of politics FFS

 

[AnGrYcRoW]

No but he wouldn't be continuing the same policies that lead to such a damning report on our economic future.

He wouldn't have need to intentionally make the tariff situation worse to win an election.

This report details just how much damage the over spending and the tariffs are going to have on us.

The conservatives wanted to cut spending and strengthen our resource sector to offset damage done by tariffs, two things the Liberals refuse to do.

People voted in the Liberals actually believing they would do 180 on everything they have done in the last ten years, they only needed to keep this facade running for a few weeks in order to fool you guys. We are already back to business as usual.

Intentionally made the tariff situation worse ?

Please elaborate

While you are at it give me the name of the last conservative prime minister who balanced the budget and paid down the debt please.

 

[jimjamjammer]

'None so blind as those that choose not to see'
Stay ignorant

 

[Lycandroid]

Intentionally made the tariff situation worse ?

Please elaborate

While you are at it give me the name of the last conservative prime minister who balanced the budget and paid down the debt please.

There are only two countries on the face of the earth that did not receive reduced tariffs, Canada and China and that is because of retaliatory tariffs and refusal to come to the table.

Canada fucked itself with retaliatory tariffs that do fuck all to the American economy while having a bigger impact on our economy, even if in theory they were put forth to have maximum impact on the us and minimal impact on Canada. These tariffs hurt us much more than they did the US our trade with them his a massively larger percentage of our economy.

The first round of tariffs were introduced and would have been removed if we made commitments to strengthen our border, which we instead denied was even an issue. Look into Sam Coopers report on this for further clarification if you can I would highly suggest it.

We could have taken the same approach as Mexico, UK or Australia for example and saved ourselves much economic pain, but if we did that the Liberals would lose the standing up to to Trump narrative which without that they would have lost the election in a landslide defeat as they were projected to so do before this tariff situation occurred.

With regard to previous conservative governments, nearly all governments in Canada have had deficits, we had a streak of 27 of governments with deficits, the key differences are the scale and impact of these deficits. What is the money being spent on and is it spurring growth in the economy or hindering it ?

The Harper government had decent economic growth, while slower than the previous Liberal government it was still pretty good when you consider the financial crisis at the time and how most governments around the world did not experience the same levels of growth.

Over the last decade under the liberal deficits we have seen very little growth, the worst on record and when you have that for a decade that is very very bad, now you have a government who will double down on the same policies of reckless spending and stifling growth at every turn, except much more aggressively.

 

[Andy Capp]

'None so blind as those that choose not to see'
Stay ignorant

Who is talking to you, fuckstick?

 

[Andy Capp]

Intentionally made the tariff situation worse ?

Please elaborate

While you are at it give me the name of the last conservative prime minister who balanced the budget and paid down the debt please.

You have to go back to before the Reform Party, Canada's version of the Tea Party (which led to MAGA's ascension to total control of the Republican Party)*, caused PC's to change into the CPC to avoid splitting the vote and losing again in the following election. Before he was born, in other words.

It certainly would not have been Poilievre either had he been elected. He wanted to drastically reduce government revenue with a regressive 15% tax cut, which disproportionately benefits the rich, of course, and cut services to poor people. That would not come close to closing the deficit, I don't think.



*Canadian NDP and some Bloc Québécois voters saw the progression and said, "Not here, motherfuckers," and voted strategically instead of splitting the vote so little PP lost and that's why all these losers are crying.