Crime Can You Beat Someone Up For Breaking Into Your House?

[Osculater]

Milwaukee firefighter, brother charged with beating accused burglar

The district attorney's office has now charged the man who was beaten with burglary – and he has a history of breaking into homes.

www.fox6now.com

Two men have been charged with beating up a burglar who broke into their home and stood over them while they slept. This seems like woke DA bullshit. The burglar, who has been charged with felony burglary, has a rap sheet a mile long with other burglary convictions.

That being said

They did chase him out of the house, beat him with a bat, and drag him back into the house to beat him further but, FAFO, right guys?

They should had planted a knife or gun on the suspect those dummies

 

[ThaiSexPills]

The right to self defence is a god given right, stripped of us by the government. I have the natural right to defend my home with any force I deem necessary and nobody has the right to take that from me.

When we allow criminals to have more rights than law abiding citizens and legislate people into being mandatory victims, we know our society is whacko. Nothing of value would ever be lost if we could put down home intruders. It’s a win for society and a win for public safety. I have no idea why it’s controversial.

I should be able to mag dump into a home intruder then invoice the family of the scumbag for my ammo costs. I can’t for the life of me understand why this is controversial. Want to live? Don’t break into my home and endanger my family. Period.

 

[Michaelangelo]

Pretty easy fix, pass a law stating the homeowner is allowed to chase the assailant and drag their candy ass back for a beatdown

 

[Scerpi]

Not sure about all the law there but they could get off in a lot of states well good ones anyway

They legally could chase him down to bring him back to hold him for the police. Citizens arrest. If he was fighting them to get away they could use force to hold him.

It really depends on what they told the cops and the story they are giving now.

However that's all a moot point in thhe shit state they are in.

In good states deadly force is allowed just for breaking in as long as you shoot them in the house or getting in the house.

Stop resisting
Stop resisting

 

[Scerpi]

Milwaukee firefighter, brother charged with beating accused burglar

The district attorney's office has now charged the man who was beaten with burglary – and he has a history of breaking into homes.

www.fox6now.com

Two men have been charged with beating up a burglar who broke into their home and stood over them while they slept. This seems like woke DA bullshit. The burglar, who has been charged with felony burglary, has a rap sheet a mile long with other burglary convictions.

That being said

They did chase him out of the house, beat him with a bat, and drag him back into the house to beat him further but, FAFO, right guys?

You should forfeit any rights you have the moment you break into someone's home to commit a crime

 

[Scerpi]

Eh, not sure what you're on about. You definitely do not have a right to chase down someone who is fleeing to drag them somewhere and beat then until you're satisfied.

Tragic… Nothing else works with these multiple repeat offenders

Catch, release, commit crimes
Catch, release, commit crimes
Catch, release, commit crimes
Catch, release, commit crimes

 

[A Very Serious Cat]

Eh, not sure what you're on about. You definitely do not have a right to chase down someone who is fleeing to drag them somewhere and beat then until you're satisfied.

Something can be technically illegal but morally justified

 

[SammyPops]

They were sleeping together?


In a righteous state they could have shot him dead in the home and been fine. However, even in those states I think you catch charges for chasing, beating, dragging, and further beating.

Homosexxuals can throw hands bro.

 

[Sara]

The guy was just released last month for a previous burglary sentence. Maybe he should have been locked up longer and wouldn't have gotten his ass beat. If the courts don't protect citizens and they can't protect themselves, what kind of shit society do we live in?

They knew this when they chased him down and dragged him back for another beating? Had he previously robbed them and that’s why he was in jail?

 

[RoastBeast]

Not surprising that liberals came to the home invader's defense.

 

[650lb Sumo]

Tragic… Nothing else works with these multiple repeat offenders

Catch, release, commit crimes
Catch, release, commit crimes
Catch, release, commit crimes
Catch, release, commit crimes

What do you think the punishment should be for burglary?

Off the top of my head, ten years. As in, actually ten years, not out in five. And you have to work hard in there. Not like destroying your health or anything but 40 hours of some kind of hard work. If you do it again: twenty years.

What about if someone does several burglaries before getting caught, and is going to get like 250 years at once? Just give them the full whack? Idk, I'm inclined to say yes.

 

[rearnakedchoke]

I have no sympathy for the burglar. Dragging the burglar back in the home is what got them charged. But I doubt a jury would find them guilty.

 

[Scerpi]

What do you think the punishment should be for burglary?

Off the top of my head, ten years. As in, actually ten years, not out in five. And you have to work hard in there. Not like destroying your health or anything but 40 hours of some kind of hard work. If you do it again: twenty years.

What about if someone does several burglaries before getting caught, and is going to get like 250 years at once? Just give them the full whack? Idk, I'm inclined to say yes.

Don't know... I didn't bother to look up this guy's record. But I'm guessing it's extremely lengthy seeing how he went straight back to a home invasion burglary almost right away from being released.

Who cares if these homeowners beat the shit out of this guy? He has zero regards for anyone else or their rights. Maybe try not invading people's home that aren't yours and you wont' get seriously injured to killed.

Give these brother's a slap on the wrist for providing a service to the community.

 

[Staph infection]

They should have just detained him for the police.

 

[650lb Sumo]

Don't know... I didn't bother to look up this guy's record. But I'm guessing it's extremely lengthy seeing how he went straight back to a home invasion burglary almost right away from being released.

Who cares if these homeowners beat the shit out of this guy? He has zero regards for anyone else or their rights. Maybe try not invading people's home that aren't yours and you wont' get seriously injured to killed.

Give these brother's a slap on the wrist for providing a service to the community.

Here are Mr Nutt's Wisconsin Circuit Court records (not including his ongoing case).

Dane County Case Number 2016CF000975 State of Wisconsin vs. Jalon A Nutt

The defendant Jalon A Nutt was found guilty of the following charge(s) in this case.

Substantial Battery-Intend Bodily Harm, a class I felony, Wisconsin Statutes 940.19(2).


Dane County Case Number 2016CF001101 State of Wisconsin vs. Jalon A Nutt

The defendant Jalon A Nutt was found guilty of the following charge(s) in this case. One or more other charges in this case were dismissed. The dismissed charges were not proven and have no legal effect. Jalon A Nutt is presumed innocent of the dismissed charges.

Jalon A Nutt was found guilty of Take and Drive Vehicle w/o Consent, a class H felony, Wisconsin Statutes 943.23(2).
Jalon A Nutt was found guilty of Bail Jumping-Felony, a class H felony, Wisconsin Statutes 946.49(1)(b).


Dane County Case Number 2016CF001859 State of Wisconsin vs. Jalon A Nutt

The defendant Jalon A Nutt was found guilty of the following charge(s) in this case.

Misappropriate ID Info - Obtain Money, a class H felony, Wisconsin Statutes 943.201(2)(a).


Milwaukee County Case Number 2021CF004906 State of Wisconsin vs. Jalon Amour Nutt

The defendant Jalon Amour Nutt was found guilty of the following charge(s) in this case.

Burglary (Home Invasion), a class E felony, Wisconsin Statutes 943.10(2)(e).


Milwaukee County Case Number 2022CF000889 State of Wisconsin vs. Jalon Amour Nutt

The defendant Jalon Amour Nutt was found guilty of the following charge(s) in this case.

Burglary Of A Building or Dwelling, a class F felony, Wisconsin Statutes 943.10(1m)(a).

 

[DoctorTaco]

Probably not allowed but you should be able to. I'm sure the fruity libs in here will tell you that you have to let them stab you and let them cum in yr wife before you're allowed to defend yourself.

I asked for details earlier in the thread and never got them, so I’ll ask again. The law as it stands now gives you the right to use as much force necessary to subdue the burglar, defend yourself, your property, your people, etc.

Legally speaking, how much more than that should be allowed? And for the kidnapping portion of what the firefighters did- give me a timeline and distance for how long I can wait or how far someone can go before I drag them back in and keep assaulting them. 3 seconds? 30? Half hour? If I see the dude at Walgreens a month later can I bring him back to my house and whip on him more?

Now for force applied- same questions. If the burglar is 70 years old, 110lbs should you be allowed to beat him within an inch of his life? What is the burglars a woman? A child? Even a strapping, young, buff, sexy criminal dude in his 20s- should I be able to break his fingers? Cut off his hands? Shatter his back? Where would you draw the line past where it sits now?

The right to self defence is a god given right, stripped of us by the government. I have the natural right to defend my home with any force I deem necessary and nobody has the right to take that from me.

When we allow criminals to have more rights than law abiding citizens and legislate people into being mandatory victims, we know our society is whacko. Nothing of value would ever be lost if we could put down home intruders. It’s a win for society and a win for public safety. I have no idea why it’s controversial.

I should be able to mag dump into a home intruder then invoice the family of the scumbag for my ammo costs. I can’t for the life of me understand why this is controversial. Want to live? Don’t break into my home and endanger my family. Period.

Read the article and get a better idea why people are discussing this case.

You should forfeit any rights you have the moment you break into someone's home to commit a crime

Same questions I was asking spam- if you forfeit all your rights when you break into my home then legally I could keep you chained in the basement as my personal secks slave for years and years bc you broke into my home and thus lost your rights.

Something can be technically illegal but morally justified

Morally justify them chasing down a fleeing burlgar, dragging him back inside, and beating him further.

Not surprising that liberals came to the home invader's defense.

See above. Liberals are saying the excessive violence and kidnapping is a step too far. No one is defending the fire fighters rights to defend their home, family and selves.

Don't know... I didn't bother to look up this guy's record. But I'm guessing it's extremely lengthy seeing how he went straight back to a home invasion burglary almost right away from being released.

Who cares if these homeowners beat the shit out of this guy? He has zero regards for anyone else or their rights. Maybe try not invading people's home that aren't yours and you wont' get seriously injured to killed.

Give these brother's a slap on the wrist for providing a service to the community.

Same questions to you as to spam: where would you personally draw the line on the injuries you can give someone, the timeline of events before it becomes illegal for you, etc.

 

[A Very Serious Cat]

Morally justify them chasing down a fleeing burlgar, dragging him back inside, and beating him further.

He has been caught an released numerous times so obviously the courts aren't stopping his criminal ways so maybe a good ol beat down will get through his thick skull to act like a decent person. It's worth a try for the safety of the greater community

 

[DoctorTaco]

He has been caught a released numerous times so obviously the courts aren't stopping his criminal ways so maybe a good ol beat down will get through his thick skull to act like a decent person. It's worth a try for the safety of the greater community

Very well- draw the line for me: how brutal should we be allowed to get with someone like him? Can we give him an Indian burn? What if we lit him on fire? Break a finger? Break 10 fingers? Can we slap him in the face? Remove his ears and nose? Break his jaw? Shatter it? Paralyze him from the waist down? Neck down?

 

[A Very Serious Cat]

Very well- draw the line for me: how brutal should we be allowed to get with someone like him? Can we give him an Indian burn? What if we lit him on fire? Break a finger? Break 10 fingers? Can we slap him in the face? Remove his ears and nose? Break his jaw? Shatter it? Paralyze him from the waist down? Neck down?

I don't really care about your desire to get pedantic over it, whatever the wronged people feel is sufficient. I'd only say nothing to cause permanent disabilities so he doesn't become more of a drain on society.

Many people have no problem with home intruders being shot dead if caught in the home so this is actually fairly tame.

 

[DoctorTaco]

whatever the wronged people feel is sufficient. I'd only say nothing to cause permanent disabilities so he doesn't become more of a drain on society

What if we simply said burglars are no longer entitled to social security, Medicare/medicade? Then the home owners could shatter their skulls, saw their feet off at the knees, and throw acid in their face so long as they feel it is sufficient.